[Go to TOC]

**SUPPORT JAMMING**

The following table contains a summary of equations developed in this section:

Support
jamming adds a few geometric complexities. A SOJ platform usually uses high gain, directional antennas. Therefore,
the jamming antenna must not only be pointed at the victim radar, but there must be alignment of radar, targets,
and SOJ platform for the jamming to be effective. Two cases will be described, main lobe-jamming and side-lobe
jamming.

Support jamming is usually applied against search and acquisition radars which continuously scan
horizontally through a volume of space. The scan could cover a sector or a full 360°. The horizontal antenna
pattern of the radar will exhibit a main lobe and side lobes as illustrated in Figure 1. The target is detected
when the main lobe sweeps across it. For main lobe jamming, the SOJ platform and the target(s) must be aligned
with the radar's main lobe as it sweeps the target(s).

For side lobe jamming, the SOJ platform may be
aligned with one or more of the radar's side lobes when the main lobe sweeps the target. The gain of a radar's
side lobes are many tens of dB less (usually more than 30 dB less) than the gain of the main lobe, so calculations
of side lobe jamming must use the gain of the side lobe for the radar receive antenna gain, not the gain of the
main lobe. Also, because many modern radars employ some form of side lobe blanking or side lobe cancellation, some
knowledge of the victim radar is required for the employment of side lobe jamming.

All
radar receivers are frequency selective. That is, they are filters that allow only a narrow range of frequencies
into the receiver circuitry. DECM, by definition, creates forgeries of the real signal and, ideally, are as well
matched to the radar receiver as the real signal. On the other hand, noise jamming probably will not match the
radar receiver bandwidth characteristics. Noise jamming is either spot jamming or barrage jamming. As illustrated
in Figure 2, spot jamming is simply narrowing the bandwidth of the noise jammer so that as much of the jammer
power as possible is in the radar receiver bandwidth. Barrage jamming is using a wide noise bandwidth to cover
several radars with one jammer or to compensate for any uncertainty in the radar frequency. In both cases some of
the noise power is "wasted" because it is not in the radar receiver filter.

In the past, noise
jammers were often described as having so many "watts per MHz". This is nothing more than the power of the noise
jammer divided by the noise bandwidth. That is, a 500 watt noise jammer transmitting a noise bandwidth of 200 MHz
has 2.5 watts/MHz. Older noise jammers often had noise bandwidths that were difficult, or impossible, to adjust
accurately. These noise jammers usually used manual tuning to set the center frequency of the noise to the radar
frequency. Modern noise jammers can set on the radar frequency quite accurately and the noise bandwidth is
selectable, so the noise bandwidth is more a matter of choice than it used to be, and it is possible that all of
the noise is placed in the victim radar's receiver.

If, in the example above, the 500 watt noise jammer were used against a radar that had a 3 MHz receiver
bandwidth, the noise jammer power applicable to that radar would be:

3 MHz x 2.5
watts/MHz = 7.5 watts → 38.75 dBm
[1]

The calculation must be done as shown in equation [1] - multiply the watts/MHz by the radar bandwidth
first and then convert to dBm. You can't convert to dBm/MHz and then multiply. (See derivation of dB in Section
2-4)

An alternate method for dB calculations is to use the bandwidth reduction factor (BF). The BF is:

[2]

where: BW

_{J} is the bandwidth of the noise jammer, and BWR is the bandwidth of the radar
receiver.

The power of the jammer in the jamming equation (P

_{J}) can be obtained by either method. If equation
[1] is used then P

_{J} is simply 38.75 dBm. If equation [2] is used then the jamming equation is written
using (P

_{J} - BF). All the following discussion uses the second method. Which ever method is used, it is
required that BW

_{J} ≥ BWR. If BW

_{J} < BW

_{R}, then all the available power is in the
radar receiver and equation [1] does not apply and the BF = 0.

MAIN LOBE STAND-OFF / STAND-IN JAMMING

The equivalent circuit shown in Figure 3 applies to main
lobe jamming by a stand-off support aircraft or a stand-in RPV. Since the jammer is not on the target aircraft,
only two of the three ranges and two of the three space loss factors (

α's) are the
same. Figure 3 differs from the J/S monostatic equivalent circuit shown in Figure 4 in Section 4-7 in that the
space loss from the jammer to the radar receiver is different.

Figure 3. Main Lobe Stand-Off / Stand-In ECM Equivalent Circuit

The equations are the same for both SOJ and SIJ. From the one way range equation in Section 4-3, and with
inclusion of BF losses:

[3]

From the two way range equation in Section 4.4:

[4]

so
[5]

Note: Keep R and F in the same units. Converting to dB and using 10 log 4

π
= 10.99 dB:

10 log J/S = 10 log P_{j} - 10 log [BW_{j}/BW_{R}]
+ 10 log G

_{ja} - 10 log P_{t} - 10 log
G

_{t} - 10 log σ... [6]

+ 10.99 dB + 40 log R

_{Tx}
- 20 log R

_{Jx}
If the simplified radar equation is used, the free space loss from the SOJ/SIJ to the radar receiver is

α_{Jx}, then equation [7] is the same as monostatic equation [6] in Section
4-7 except

α_{Jx} replaces

α, and the bandwidth
reduction factor [BF] losses are included:

10 log J = 10 log P_{j} - BF +
10 log G_{ja} + 10 log G_{r} - α_{Jx} (factors in dB)
[7]

Since the free space loss from the radar to the target and return is the same both ways,

α_{Tx} =

α_{Rx} =

α_{1}, equation [8] is the same as monostatic equation [7] in Section 4-7.

10 log S = 10 log P_{t} + 10 log G_{t} + 10 log G_{r} + G_{σ}
- 2α_{1} (factors in dB)
[8]

and 10 log J/S = 10 log P

_{j} - BF + 10 log G

_{ja} -

α_{Jx} - 10 log P

_{t} - 10 log G

_{t} - G

_{σ}
+ 2

α_{1} (factors in dB) [9]

Notice that unlike equation [8] in
Section 4-7, there are two different

α's in [9] because the signal paths are
different.

SIDE LOBE STAND-OFF / STAND-IN JAMMING

The equivalent circuit shown in Figure 4. It
differs from Figure 3, (main lobe SOJ/SIJ) in that the radar

receiver antenna gain is different for the radar
signal return and the jamming.

Figure 4. Side Lobe Stand-Off / Stand-In ECM Equivalent Circuit

To calculate side lobe jamming, the gain of the radar antenna's side lobes must be known or estimated. The
gain of each side lobe will be different than the gain of the other side lobes. If the antenna is symmetrical, the
first side lobe is the one on either side of the main lobe, the second side lobe is the next one on either side of
the first side lobe, and so on. The side lobe gain is G

_{SLn} , where the 'n' subscript denotes side lobe
number: 1, 2, ..., n.

The signal is the same as main lobe equations [4] and [8], except G

_{r}
= G

_{r(ML)}

[10]

If simplified radar equations are used:

10 log S = 10 log P_{t} + 10 log G_{t} + 10 log G_{r(ML)} +
G_{σ} - 2_{α}1 (factors in dB)

The jamming equation is the same as main lobe equations [3] and [7] except

G_{r} = G_{r(SL)}:
[11]

10 log J = 10 log P_{j} - BF + 10 log G_{ja} + 10 log G_{r(SL)}
- α_{Jx} (factors in dB) [12]

so
[13]

Note: keep R and F in same units. Converting to dB and using 10 log 4B = 10.99 dB:

10 log
J/S = 10 log P

_{j} - BF + 10 log G

_{ja} + 10 log G

_{r(SL)} - 10 log P

_{t} - 10 log
G

_{t} - 10 log G

_{r(ML)} ... [14]

- 10 log σ + 10.99 dB +
40 log R

_{Tx} - 20 log R

_{Jx}
(factors in dB)

If simplified radar equations are used:

10 log J/S = 10 log P

_{j} - BF + 10 log
G

_{ja} + 10 log G

_{r(SL)} -

α_{Jx}
- 10 log P

_{t} - 10 log G

_{t} ... [15]

- 10 log G

_{r(ML)} - G

_{σ} + 2

_{α}1
(in dB)

**Table of Contents
for Electronics Warfare and Radar Engineering Handbook**

Introduction |
Abbreviations | Decibel | Duty
Cycle | Doppler Shift | Radar Horizon / Line
of Sight | Propagation Time / Resolution | Modulation
| Transforms / Wavelets | Antenna Introduction
/ Basics | Polarization | Radiation Patterns |
Frequency / Phase Effects of Antennas |
Antenna Near Field | Radiation Hazards |
Power Density | One-Way Radar Equation / RF Propagation
| Two-Way Radar Equation (Monostatic) |
Alternate Two-Way Radar Equation |
Two-Way Radar Equation (Bistatic) |
Jamming to Signal (J/S) Ratio - Constant Power [Saturated] Jamming
| Support Jamming | Radar Cross Section (RCS) |
Emission Control (EMCON) | RF Atmospheric
Absorption / Ducting | Receiver Sensitivity / Noise |
Receiver Types and Characteristics |
General Radar Display Types |
IFF - Identification - Friend or Foe | Receiver
Tests | Signal Sorting Methods and Direction Finding |
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) / Reflection Coefficient / Return
Loss / Mismatch Loss | Microwave Coaxial Connectors |
Power Dividers/Combiner and Directional Couplers |
Attenuators / Filters / DC Blocks |
Terminations / Dummy Loads | Circulators
and Diplexers | Mixers and Frequency Discriminators |
Detectors | Microwave Measurements |
Microwave Waveguides and Coaxial Cable |
Electro-Optics | Laser Safety |
Mach Number and Airspeed vs. Altitude Mach Number |
EMP/ Aircraft Dimensions | Data Busses | RS-232 Interface
| RS-422 Balanced Voltage Interface | RS-485 Interface |
IEEE-488 Interface Bus (HP-IB/GP-IB) | MIL-STD-1553 &
1773 Data Bus |

*This HTML version may be printed but not reproduced on websites.*