RF Cafe Homepage
Werbel Microwave (power dividers, couplers)

Crane Aerospace Electronics Microwave Solutions

Axiom Test Equipment - RF Cafe

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low-priced products, all of which I created.

RF Cascade Workbook for Excel

RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio

RF & Electronics Symbols for Office

RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio

RF Workbench

T-Shirts, Mugs, Cups, Ball Caps, Mouse Pads

These Are Available for Free

Espresso Engineering Workbook™

Smith Chart™ for Excel

Innovative Power Products (IPP) RF Combiners / Dividers

The Penny: Is It Worth the Cost of Minting?

The Penny: Is It Worth the Cost of Minting? - RF CafeThe debate over whether to stop minting new pennies is rooted in economic efficiency, public convenience, and the broader impact on commerce. President Trump's directive to the Treasury Department to halt penny production is driven by the fact that each penny costs nearly three cents to produce, leading to a financial loss for the U.S. government. However, this decision raises concerns about potential shortages, changes in pricing strategies, and consumer sentiment regarding the smallest unit of U.S. currency.

One major argument in favor of stopping penny production is the high cost relative to its value. The government loses money by minting pennies, and these losses accumulate to millions of dollars annually. Many countries, including Canada, have already eliminated their smallest coin, shifting to rounding systems for cash transactions without significant disruption. Additionally, the growing prevalence of digital payments reduces the need for small-denomination coins, meaning that fewer people actively use pennies in daily transactions. Cashless purchases would remain unaffected, and businesses could adjust by rounding transactions up or down to the nearest nickel, as seen in other countries that have phased out low-value coins. The Treasury Department could also resume minting pennies if an actual shortage developed, preventing long-term economic disruption.

Public opinion on eliminating the penny has been a subject of research in various studies over the years. A 2014 YouGov poll found that 51% of Americans favored keeping the penny, while 34% supported eliminating it, with the remaining percentage undecided. Another study conducted by Americans for Common Cents, an organization that advocates for keeping the penny, found that a majority of Americans still view the penny as a necessary part of daily transactions. However, independent studies have shown that when presented with the economic inefficiencies associated with the penny, support for its elimination tends to increase. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has also examined the financial implications of discontinuing penny production, estimating potential savings for the Treasury but acknowledging that consumer sentiment plays a role in the decision-making process. 

A significant consideration in eliminating pennies is how rounding transactions to the nearest nickel would be implemented, particularly in the case of sales tax calculations. Since sales tax rates vary by state and locality, a uniform rounding rule would need to be established to ensure that taxes applied to purchases do not introduce an unfair burden on consumers. Some states, such as those with no sales tax (e.g., Oregon, New Hampshire, Montana), would experience no impact, while others might need to adjust tax calculations to round to the nearest five-cent increment. This issue has been successfully addressed in other countries, such as Canada, where cash transactions are rounded but credit or debit transactions are still calculated to the cent. If rounding rules are not carefully implemented, concerns about businesses consistently rounding up rather than down could lead to consumer skepticism about the fairness of the system.

On the other hand, critics argue that eliminating penny production could lead to unintended consequences. One concern is that individuals and businesses might hoard pennies, fearing they will become scarce, which could create a shortage of pennies for those who still rely on them for making exact change. Even though fewer people use cash today, those who do - especially lower-income individuals who rely on cash transactions - might be disproportionately affected by rounding policies. If most businesses choose to round prices up rather than down, consumers could experience a slight but cumulative increase in costs. Additionally, the justification for eliminating the penny could raise questions about other fractional monetary values, such as the continued use of the tenth-of-a-cent in gasoline pricing. While gasoline prices are typically calculated at a fraction of a cent for marketing and accounting reasons, the absence of pennies might call into question whether such precision is still necessary or if rounding practices should be reformed in that industry as well.

The broader economic impact of eliminating penny production would likely be minimal in the long run, as businesses and consumers adjust to rounding practices. However, the psychological attachment to pennies, their role in cash-based transactions, and the symbolic importance of preserving all denominations of U.S. currency make this a topic of continued debate. Below is a comparative analysis of the pros and cons of stopping penny production:

Comparison of Arguments For and Against Stopping Penny Production

Pros (Supporting Stopping Penny Minting)  Cons (Opposing Stopping Penny Minting)  
The government loses money on each penny minted (costs nearly three cents to produce).               Hoarding could cause a shortage of pennies, disrupting cash transactions.
Digital and card-based payments dominate, reducing the need for small denominations. Consumers who rely on cash transactions might be disproportionately affected.
Many countries, such as Canada, have successfully eliminated low-value coins without issue. Rounding purchases to the nearest nickel could result in a slight increase in consumer costs if businesses consistently round up.
Cash transactions can be rounded to the nearest nickel, minimizing disruption. Pennies still play a role in psychological pricing strategies (e.g., $4.99 instead of $5.00).
The Treasury could resume penny production if a shortage develops. Concerns about inflation and price manipulation may arise if the penny is eliminated.
Eliminating the penny simplifies transactions and reduces the need for handling large quantities of low-value coins. Gasoline pricing still uses tenths of a cent, raising questions about whether fractional pricing should be reformed.
Public opinion is shifting, with increasing awareness of the inefficiency of pennies. Studies show that many Americans still prefer keeping the penny as a part of the currency system.
Sales tax rounding rules could be adjusted to minimize impact. States with varying sales tax rates may face logistical challenges in implementing rounding policies fairly.

All things considered, while economic logic favors discontinuing penny production, the societal and psychological implications suggest that the transition should be carefully managed to avoid unintended consequences. The experience of other countries indicates that consumers and businesses can adapt to rounding practices, but any change to the currency system requires careful consideration of both immediate and long-term effects. Public sentiment remains mixed, but studies indicate that with proper education and implementation, opposition may decrease over time.


AI Competition: ChatGPT-Gemini-Grok 3, GabAI - RF CafeThis content was generated by primarily the ChatGPT (OpenAI), and/or Gemini (Google), and/or Arya (GabAI), and/or Grok 3 (x.AI) artificial intelligence (AI) engine. Some review was performed to help detect and correct any inaccuracies; however, you are encouraged to verify the information yourself if it will be used for critical applications. In some cases, multiple solicitations to the AI engine(s) was(were) used to assimilate final content. Images and external hyperlinks have also been added occasionally. Courts have ruled that AI-generated content is not subject to copyright restrictions, but since I modify them, everything here is protected by RF Cafe copyright. Many of the images are likewise generated and modified. Your use of this data implies an agreement to hold totally harmless Kirt Blattenberger, RF Cafe, and any and all of its assigns. Thank you. Here are the major categories.

Electronics & High Tech Companies | Electronics & Tech Publications | Electronics & Tech Pioneers | Electronics & Tech Principles | Tech Standards Groups & Industry Associations | Societal Influences on Technology

Innovative Power Products (IPP) RF Combiners / Dividers
RF Cascade Workbook 2018 by RF Cafe

Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs

Cafe Press