|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$15 Federal License Fee for Telephone Users?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$15 Federal License Fee for Telephone Users?
Suppose the Federal Government passed a law making every telephone customer pay $15 a year for a license to use his telephone. Far-fetched? Not at all. Telephone subscribers across the Nation already pay this average sum each year for the privilege of making local and long distance calls. Of course, telephone users do not receive licenses for their money. The fee is paid in excise taxes - ten percent of the amounts paid for all local and long distance service. Business houses, manufacturers and other large telephone users pay thousands of dollars in excise taxes annually. Last year, in Pennsylvania and Delaware, this tax amounted to a staggering $33,518,886! Our Companies collect the money and pass it along to the Federal Government. None of it ever comes back as direct benefit to our Companies or our customers. The excise tax on telephone service was inaugurated as a temporary, emergency measure. During World War II it served two purposes: to raise revenue and to discourage the use of service which could not be expanded to meet civilian demand. The war emergency has passed. The civilian demand has long since ceased to interfere with military needs. The temporary excise tax remains. The tax is unfair, discriminatory and unrealistic. It penalizes one segment of the public; it singles out the telephone from other household utilities - gas, water and electricity - which have no such tax; and it is imposed much in the same way as the tax on luxuries - liquor, jewelry, furs and night clubs. The tax is an unwarranted burden on our subscribers, and regardless of whether it costs a customer thousands of dollars, $15 or even one dollar, we believe it is unfair and we oppose it. And now comes a new and more harmful proposal. The Joint Federal-State Action Committee proposes that part of this tax burdening the telephone user - 40 percent of the amount levied on local telephone service - be handed over to the states. The states, thus subsidized by the telephone user, would be required to devote these funds to the erection of sewage disposal plants and for vocational training. The balance of the excise taxes on telephone service would still remain in the Federal Tax structure. This proposal would in effect make this unfair, discriminatory tax a permanent part of the states' tax laws. In such circumstances the possibility of repealing any part of the "telephone excise tax" would seem remote. Our customers justly resent this unfair tax on their telephone service and should have the facts to carry their case effectively to the State and national lawmakers. And each of us owes it to our customers, neighbors and friends to give them these facts that are so vital to their pocketbooks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||