Directional Couplers

Directional power couplers are key components in RF and microwave systems, designed to sample a small portion of signal power traveling in one direction while minimizing interference with the main signal path. They're widely used for monitoring, measurement, and feedback in various electronic systems. This treatise explores their historical development, types, construction methods, design principles, fabrication techniques, and critical performance metrics, providing equations to support practical implementation. It is not meant to be a comprehensive design tutorial.

History

The directional coupler emerged in the 1940s amid advancements in radar technology. Early engineers needed ways to monitor signal power without invasive methods, leading to innovations like slotted lines and waveguide-based sampling. In 1944, H.A. Bethe introduced the "Bethe hole" coupler, using small apertures in waveguide walls to extract directional signals. By the 1950s, lumped-element designs appeared for lower frequencies, while distributed-element couplers took hold in microwave applications. The 1960s brought planar technologies like stripline and microstrip, driven by circuit miniaturization. Today, couplers span a vast frequency range, serving diverse engineering needs.

Types, Construction, and Fabrication

Couplers vary by frequency range, power handling, and physical structure. Below are the primary types, their construction, and practical fabrication details.

1. Lumped-Element Couplers

Use: Low-frequency circuits requiring compact size.

Construction: Made with discrete components - capacitors, inductors, transformers - to replicate wave behavior. Often uses a transformer or capacitive bridge.

Example: A small circuit board splitting power for signal monitoring.

Fabrication:

• Materials: Use a toroidal ferrite core (e.g., permeability 800–2000) for the transformer, enamel-coated magnet wire (e.g., 28 AWG), and ceramic or mica capacitors (e.g., 10–100 pF).
• Assembly: Wind the transformer with a turns ratio (e.g., 3:1 for 10 dB coupling) on the core - primary on the main line, secondary to the coupled port. Solder to a perforated board or small PCB. Add a tuning capacitor in parallel with the secondary, calculated as C_c = 1 / (2π f Z₀), to adjust phase.
• Tips: Keep leads short (< cm) to minimize parasitics. Test with a signal generator and oscilloscope, tweaking turns or capacitance for desired coupling (e.g., 10% power). Shield with a metal enclosure if noise is an issue.
• Challenges: Bandwidth is narrow (10–20% of center frequency); high frequencies increase stray inductance, degrading performance.

2. Distributed-Element Couplers

a. Coupled-Line Coupler

Use: Microwave frequencies in planar designs.

Construction: Two parallel quarter-wave lines transferring power through electromagnetic coupling.

Example: A printed circuit board design for signal sampling in a compact system.

Fabrication:

• Materials: Use a double-sided PCB substrate (e.g., FR4 with ε_r = 4.5, 1.6 mm thick) or low-loss material (e.g., Rogers 4350, ε_r = 3.66) for higher frequencies. Copper cladding is typically 1 oz/ft².
• Assembly: Etch two parallel microstrip lines, length L = λ/4 = c / (4 f √ε_r), spaced for coupling (e.g., 0.2–0.5 mm for 10 dB). Widths set Z₀ = 50 Ω (e.g., ~3 mm on FR4); spacing sets Z_0e and Z_0o. Use a PCB mill or photoresist process. Solder SMA connectors to input, output, and coupled ports.
• Tips: Simulate with software (e.g., ADS, KiCAD) to optimize spacing and length. Test with a network analyzer for coupling and isolation. Ground vias along edges reduce unwanted modes.
• Challenges: Fabrication tolerances (±0.1 mm) affect coupling; dielectric variations shift frequency response.

b. Branch-Line Coupler

Use: Microwave frequencies requiring equal power split.

Construction: Four quarter-wave lines (two at Z₀, two at Z₀/√2) forming a 90° hybrid.

Fabrication:

• Materials: Same as coupled-line - FR4 or low-loss substrate, copper cladding.
• Assembly: Etch a square with four λ/4 arms: two at Z₀ (e.g., 3 mm wide for 50 Ω), two at Z₀/√2 (e.g., 4.2 mm for 35.4 Ω). Connect via corners, soldering connectors at each port (input, output, coupled, isolated).
• Tips: Ensure precise 90° bends and equal lengths - use a ruler or CAD tool. Test with a VNA for 3 dB split and 90° phase shift. Add tuning stubs if impedance drifts.
• Challenges: Larger footprint than coupled-line; narrowband (10–20% bandwidth).

3. Waveguide Couplers (Multi-Hole)

Use: High-power, high-frequency applications.

Construction: Metal waveguides with holes spaced λ_g/4 to sample fields.

Example: A metallic structure used in high-frequency signal testing.

Fabrication:

• Materials: Aluminum or brass waveguide (e.g., WR-90 for 8–12 GHz, 22.9 mm × 10.2 mm). Secondary waveguide or coax for coupled port.
• Assembly: Drill N holes (e.g., 3–5, 2–5 mm diameter) along the broad wall, spaced λ_g/4 = λ / [4 √(1 - (λ / λ_c)²)] apart. Attach a secondary waveguide or coax adapter over holes. Braze or screw joints for rigidity.
• Tips: Calculate λ_g from frequency and waveguide size (λ_c = 2a). Use a milling machine for precision (±0.05 mm). Test with a power meter; adjust hole size for coupling (e.g., 20 dB).
• Challenges: Alignment critical - misaligned holes kill directivity. High cost; bulky (e.g., 30 cm long).

Design Principles and Equations

Couplers divide power between a main line (input to output) and a coupled line (sampled signal), with directionality as their hallmark. Below are design approaches and equations.

1. Lumped-Element Coupler

Design: Uses a transformer or capacitive network to split power.

Coupling Factor (C): C = 10 log₁₀ (P_c / P_in), where P_c is coupled power, P_in is input power.

Equations: For a transformer with turns ratio N:

• P_c = P_in (1 / N²)
• P_out = P_in (1 - 1 / N²)
• C_c = 1 / (2π f Z₀), Z₀ = impedance (e.g., 50 Ω).

2. Distributed-Element Coupler (Coupled-Line)

Design: Two parallel quarter-wave lines.

Coupling Factor: C = 20 log₁₀ | (Z_0e - Z_0o) / (Z_0e + Z_0o) |, Z_0e and Z_0o from line geometry.

Impedance: Z₀ = √(Z_0e Z_0o). For C = 10 dB, Z_0e ≈ 65.6 Ω, Z_0o ≈ 38.1 Ω.

Length: L = λ/4 = c / (4 f √ε_r), c = 3×10⁸ m/s.

3. Branch-Line Coupler

Design: Four quarter-wave lines forming a 90° hybrid.

Power Split: P_coupled = P_in/2, P_out = P_in/2, C = 3 dB.

Equations: Z_branch = Z₀ / √2 ≈ 35.4 Ω for Z₀ = 50 Ω.

4. Waveguide Coupler (Multi-Hole)

Design: Holes spaced λ_g/4 along a waveguide wall.

Coupling Factor: C = 20 log₁₀ | Σ_n=1^N a_n e^{-j n π / 2} |, a_n = hole amplitude.

Guide Wavelength: λ_g = λ / √(1 - (λ / λ_c)²), λ_c = 2a.

Wavelength and Phase Relationships

Wavelength: Couplers use quarter-wave (λ/4) sections for interference. λ = c / f; in a medium, λ = c / (f √ε_r).

Phase: Coupled port lags output by 90° (π/2) in a 90° hybrid. Waveguide phase adjusts via hole spacing.

Performance Parameters and Equations

1. Isolation (I)

   I = 10 log₁₀ (P_in / P_iso). Typical: 20–40 dB.

2. Insertion Loss (IL)

   IL = 10 log₁₀ (P_in / P_out) = -10 log₁₀ (1 - 10^-C/10). For C = 10 dB, IL ≈ 0.46 dB.

3. Return Loss (RL)

   RL = 20 log₁₀ | (Z_in - Z₀) / (Z_in + Z₀) |. Target: >20 dB.

4. Directivity (D)

   D = 10 log₁₀ (P_c / P_iso) = I - C. Typical: 15–30 dB.

Practical Considerations

• Lumped: Simple, narrow bandwidth (10–20%).
• Distributed: Broadband (20–50%), larger at low frequencies.
• Waveguide: High power, narrowband (10–20%), bulky.
• Losses: Add ~0.1–0.5 dB to IL from materials and mismatches.
• Applications: Signal monitoring, power measurement, system feedback.

This content was generated by primarily the ChatGPT (OpenAI), and/or Gemini (Google), and/or Arya (GabAI), and/or Grok (x.AI), and/or DeepSeek artificial intelligence (AI) engine. Some review was performed to help detect and correct any inaccuracies; however, you are encouraged to verify the information yourself if it will be used for critical applications. In some cases, multiple solicitations to the AI engine(s) was(were) used to assimilate final content. Images and external hyperlinks have also been added occasionally. Courts have ruled that AI-generated content is not subject to copyright restrictions, but since I modify them, everything here is protected by RF Cafe copyright. Many of the images are likewise generated and modified. Your use of this data implies an agreement to hold totally harmless Kirt Blattenberger, RF Cafe, and any and all of its assigns. Thank you. Here are the major categories.

Electronics & High Tech Companies | Electronics & Tech Publications | Electronics & Tech Pioneers | Electronics & Tech Principles | Tech Standards Groups & Industry Associations | Societal Influences on Technology

AI Technical Trustability Update

While working on an update to my RF Cafe Espresso Engineering Workbook project to add a couple calculators about FM sidebands (available soon). The good news is that AI provided excellent VBA code to generate a set of Bessel function plots. The bad news is when I asked for a table showing at which modulation indices sidebands 0 (carrier) through 5 vanish, none of the agents got it right. Some were really bad. The AI agents typically explain their reason and method correctly, then go on to produces bad results. Even after pointing out errors, subsequent results are still wrong. I do a lot of AI work and see this often, even with subscribing to professional versions. I ultimately generated the table myself. There is going to be a lot of inaccurate information out there based on unverified AI queries, so beware.