Search:                        
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday,
Today, and Tomorrow™

Vintage Magazines

Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Electronics Illustrated

Formulas | Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics
Physics


Calvin & Phineas

Archive | Sitemap

kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Radar | AI
Cogitations
RF Museum
Videos | Pics |
Things | Logos
Radio Datashts
WJ Tech Notes
Day in History

Entertainment

Crosswords
Humor | Podcasts
Quotes | Quizzes
Tech Comics

Parts | Services

1000s of Listings


About RF Cafe

Software: RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office | RF Symbols & Stencils for Visio | Espresso Workbook
Conduct RF DC-70 GHz RF Cables - RF Cafe Website

Begging the Question: BTQ Abuse

Begging the Question - RF Cafe WebsiteWe all have pet peeves, which begs the question, "What is yours?" One of my pet peeves is the nearly universal misuse of the phrase "begs the question." As presented in the first sentence, the usage is utterly incorrect. To "beg the question" does not mean a question is begging to be asked. Rather, it describes the occasion of a self-proving statement, a logical fallacy or circular reasoning. Grammarians refer to the transgression as "BTQ Abuse." Supposedly, the original derivation is from the Latin term "petitio principii," meaning to petition the principle, or to challenge the assertion of a statement. For example, if I say, "ABC Corporation's receivers are superior to XYZ Corporation's inferior receivers," I have begged the question, "Why are ABC Corporation's receivers superior to XYZ Corporation's receivers?," or, conversely, "Why are XYZ Corporation's receivers inferior to ABC Corporation's receivers?" What brings this issue to mind is that I just read an article in Discover magazine where an accomplished astrophysicist erroneously used the term. Eventually, constant misuse of a word or phrase causes it to be given a place in modern lexicons akin to how panhandlers are eventually permitted to populate highway off-ramps and intersections because it's easier to allow them than to eradicate them. Are you a BTQ Abuser?

For the record, another pet peeve of mine is the fallacious statement, "I could care less." That is another logical fallacy because what is really meant is, "I couldn't care less." If you "could care less," then that means you still care at least a little about the subject when what you really mean is you care as little you possibly can about the subject already - it is not possible for you to care less than you already do. A Ph.D.-degreed scientist I listen to regularly on the radio makes the mistake frequently during arguements.

I will be glad to post your grammatical pet peeves here if you send them to me - even if (especially if) they are mistakes I commit (other than an admitted continual rash of typos).

Posted  January 14, 2014

Amplifier Solutions Corporation (ASC) - RF Cafe Website
Please Support My Advertisers!
Transcat | Axiom Test Equipment - RF Cafe Website
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Empower RF | Reactel | SF Circuits

Alliance Test | Isotec
Transcat | Axiom Rental Equipment - RF Cafe Website

Johanson Dielectrics Thin Film Substrates - RF Cafe Website

Johanson Technology Antennas - RF Cafe Website
Windfreak Technologies Frequency Synthesizers - RF Cafe Website

Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs

Anritsu MA25211A P25 Radio Auto Test & Alignment System - RF Cafe Website

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my ridiculously low-priced products, all of which I created.

RF Cascade Workbook for Excel

RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio

RF & Electronics Symbols for Office

RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio

RF Workbench

T-Shirts, Mugs, Cups, Ball Caps, Mouse Pads

These Are Available for Free

Espresso Engineering Workbook™

Smith Chart™ for Excel