& App Notes
As you might know if you have
been an RF Cafe visitor for a while, my life-long hobby has been model aviation.
Many notable people have similarly been aeromodelers from a young age, including
aircraft designer Burt Rutan, Space
Shuttle astronaut Robert
"Hoot" Gibson, radio personality
Paul Harvey, actor and WWII bomber pilot
Olympiad Bruce Jenner, catamaran and surfboard designer
Hobart "Hobie" Alter, to name a
Dr. David (Dave) Wineland has just been added to the list
since he won the Nobel Prize in Physics in December 2012 for his work on quantum
computing. The Academy of Model Aeronautics' (AMA) monthly magazine
printed an interview with Dr. Wineland in the January 2013 edition, where he discusses
his history with model airplanes and his work at the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado. Model
editor Jay Smith granted permission for me to reprint the article here on RF Cafe
since it will likely be of interest to engineers and scientists who visit the website.
This article appeared in the January 2013 edition of
a publication of the Academy of Model Aviation (AMA). Thanks to Editor Jay Smith
for permission to reprint it here.
Dave Wineland Awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics
David Wineland, Ph.D is as humble and soft spoken as they come. A 68-yearold
scientist with degrees from CalBerkeley and Harvard, his job title is Group Leader
in the Time/Frequency Division at the National Institute of Standards (NIST), the
so-called "atomic clock." He is a long-time AMA member and lover of model airplanes,
and he just was announced as co-winner of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics, to bee
awarded at a ceremony in Sweden on December 10, 2012.
Don DeLoach spoke briefly with Dr. Wineland about model airplanes, quantum computing,
and the mind-blowing attention he's received since being announced October 9, 2012,
as a Nobel Laureate.
DD: Do you remember your first model airplanes? How old were
DW: Oh, I'm not sure. It was certainly before I was 10 years
old, so the early 1950s I guess. I actually still have it, a scalelike solid display
model from a StromBecKer kit.
DD: What about your first experience with flying models
DW: California in the 1950s was an amazing place for kids who loved
model airplanes. In those days, I'd ride my bike down to the schoolyard where there
were always guys flying Control Line, so that was my first type of flying model.
But there were Free Flight airplanes around, too, and I was always most interested
in those. My family lived in Sacramento and there was a Free Flight field close
to Mather AFB, off of Eagles Nest Road. That was the home field of the Capital Condors
club. It was a 30-minute car ride so it took a bit of convincing to get my parents
to drive me up there, but wow! Those guys really knew how to fly FF and I was entranced
Here is Dave with his
in 2006 in Denver. This is his original 1980 Nats
winner in D Gas. The model is immaculate and is a consistent contest winner. Don
A very young Dave Wineland. The year is
1954 and the place is Sacramento, CA. Photo provided by Dave Wineland.
DD: What other inspiring model airplane memories stick out from
DW: A quick story: As a kid I of course didn't know anything
about flight trimming, but somehow got airplane in a thermal, and friends and I
tried to chase it on bikes. The wind was pretty calm but the model flew so high
it went out of sight. Miraculously, about an hour later, the mode landed a hundred
yards from where it was launched.
DD: When did you first join AMA?
DW: I got back into model in the early 1970s, after graduate
school. I was in Seattle then, as a postdoctoral researcher, and joined AMA about
DD: Talk about your mentors. Or did you learn in a vacuum?
DW: I pretty much learned on my own. In the neighborhood it
was just us kids - I couldn't get my dad hooked.
DD: Did you maintain contact with any of those old modeling
DW: Yes. One just sent me a note about the Nobel Prize last
DD: Why are you into aeromodeling?
DW: Well, this is hard to put into words. I guess it's just
the emotion I feel when watching them fly. It rekindles a lot of magical memories
DD: Why Free Flight?
DW: Free Flight is so pure and challenging. I like the contrasts
inherent in high-powered models - the speed of the climb followed by the slow-motion
DD: Talk about your club, the Magnificant Mountain Men.
DW: by the early '70s I really wanted to do Free Flight again.
I was hired at NIST, which was then called the national Bureau of Standards, and
moved to Boulder, Colorado, in 1975. I knew about the Magnificent Mountain Men FF
club and joined immediately after visiting the field. George Batiuk and Bill Gieskieng
[both FF Hall of Fame members] were there. Dean Carpenter was a good friend with
whom I hit it off right away.
DD: What is your favorite model and why?
DW: I like the looks of the Satellite the best. I never had the
greatest success with it. It is harder to build and fly than some of the simpler
designs, but it is this challenge that interests me.
||1944, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
||Nationanl Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, University
|University of California, Berkeley;
Harvard University; University of Washington
--------- Awards ---------
||Davisson-Germer Prize in Atomic or Surface Physics
||William F. Meggers Award of the Optical Society of America
||Einstein Prize for Laser Science of the Society of Optical and Quantum Electronics
||Rabi Award from the IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
||Arthur L. Schawlow Prize in Laser Science
||Frederic Ives Medal, Optical Society of America
||National Medal of Science in the engineering sciences
|Bonfils-Stanton Foundation Award
||Herbert Walther Award, Optical Society of America
||Benjamin Franklin Medal in Physics (shared with Juan Ignacio Cirac and Peter
||Nobel Prize in Physics (shared with Serge Haroche)
DD: What is your most significant accomplishment in aeromodeling?
DW: Gosh, I don't know. I won FF Gas events at the AMA Nationals
in 1980 and 1981, but it wouldn't have mattered if I had not won. What I enjoyed
was being at the Nats with everyone else and sharing the same interest. That was
DD: To what/whom do you attribute your career success?
DW: Well this is hard to single out. My dad was a civil engineer.
Dad's work ethic certainly rubbed off on me. But it really hard to say. There were
lots of good people in my corner over the years, so I was lucky. I had good support
from my boss and my boss's bos.
DD: Did you always know you were going to be a physicist? At
what age did you know this?
DW: I took physics class as a senior in high school. I thought,
"Wow, this is cool!" and wanted to stick with it. I also enjoyed literature but
thought I should pursue a career with more earning potential.
DD: What message do you have for today's youth who want to pursue
a career path similar to yours?
DW: Model builders have a lot of the qualities that we need
in experimental physics. One contrast we see with grad students is many are great
with devices like computers, but most have not worked with their hands before. Model
builders are naturals at this. A model-building background is perfect. When you
build a wing on an airplane you have to build it to a certain strength or it will
break. This is hard to teach except from practical experience.
DD: Talk about your research bit. How far in the future is a
quantum computer (QC), and what will it mean for mankind?
DW: Don't invest in any quantum computing companies yet (laughs).
On a serious note, we can make very small QCs now, but they are so small they are
not really useful yet. But the technology is definitely coming along. Ina
decade or so I feel optimistic that there will be a WC that will actually do something
useful, or at least tell us something important.
DD: What are the differences between quantum computing and classical
DW: In our lab at NIST we confine individual
atomic ions, like a marble in a fish bowl. At the small scale, the marble (ion)
rolls in a bowl. We have now learned how to put that ion in a "superposition" state.,
that is, it can be on both the right side and the left side of the bowl at the same
time, which of course makes no sense in the ordinary day experience. Now, with classical
computers (CC), like your laptop for example, the basic info is stored in a binary
code, combinations of ones and zeroes. With quantum computers we can use small quantum
states to represent the memory as ones and zeroes at the same time. With
that kind of memory efficiency in QC we can store more information in three hundred
quantum bits than we can with a classical computer made from all the matter in the
universe. This is known as exponential scaling; it does not exist in the CC world.
Now, we still need classical computers to run our tiny QC. But in the long term,
a larger scale QC would be able to solve certain large problems that would be impossible
in a CC.
DD: How many other groups are working in your branch of quantum
DW: We are working on charge atoms. There are now about 35 groups
around the world doing research similar to the work of our group. An there are five
to 10 other physica lplatforms devote to this problem of qunatum computing. We at
NIST are on one cog of a pretty big wheel.
DD: You're 68. What does the future hold for you? Retirement?
DW: Not sure but it won't be because I've lost my interest in
science. I now deal with more administrative stuff than I'd like. And I wish I had
more time for modeling!
DD: Any parting thoughts?
DW: Well, the Nobel Prize gets a huge amount of attention, which
is amazing to me. Unfortunately, it focuses on a couple individuals. This is not
representative of how science works because advances only come from the efforts
of many people working on a common problem. The award could esaily have gone to
some of my other colleagues.
- Don DeLoach
Note: I apologize for any errors that may have crept in as I typed in the text
form the magazine hard copy.