Search:                        
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
Serving a Pleasing Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™

Vintage Magazines

Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Electronics Illustrated

Formulas | Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics
Physics


Calvin & Phineas

Archive | Sitemap
kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Radar | AI
Cogitations
RF Museum
Videos | Pics |
Things | Logos
Radio Datashts
WJ Tech Notes
Day in History

Entertainment

Crosswords
Humor | Podcasts
Quotes | Quizzes
Tech Comics

Parts | Services

1000s of Listings


About RF Cafe

Software: RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office | RF Symbols & Stencils for Visio | Espresso Workbook
Espresso Engineering Workbook

Stacked Array for Television
October 1948 Radio & Television News

October 1948 Radio & TV News
October 1948 Radio & Television News Cover - RF Cafe Website[Table of Contents]

Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics. See articles from Radio & Television News, published 1919-1959. All copyrights hereby acknowledged.

TV antennas in the early days of broadcast television were typically fairly simple designs that worked well for city dwellers and anyone living within a few tens of miles of the tower, but rural dwellers struggled for a good signal. Even urban and suburban TV owners had problems with multipath reception that created ghost images on the display. The farm folks needed the high gain of a more complex antenna for pulling small signals out of the noise, while urbanites needed high directivity to be able to reject signals that were bouncing off buildings and bridges before combining in the receiver to produce multiple versions of the picture. Unlike today where relatively small, compact antennas with a low noise preamplifier at the antenna (see my Able Signal antenna write-up) does a pretty nice job of guaranteeing a good signal, large structures with many large elements were needed. Recall photos of building rooftops in a large city that were chock full of TV antennas. This article describes a means of stacking multiple identical antennas vertically for achieving additional gain with careful phasing of the transmission lines between them.

Stacked Array for Television

Stacked Array, October 1948 Radio & Television News - RF Cafe WebsiteBy Edward M. Noll

Temple University

Horizontal antenna elements stacked vertically concentrate sensitivity at low vertical angles to correspond with the low angle of arrival of the television signals. At high frequency all high angle radiation is useless because it penetrates the ionosphere. Radiation at low vertical angles with respect to the horizon contributes the useful line-of-sight signal and extended line-of-sight signal. If the receiving antenna is designed with peak sensitivity at low angles we not only benefit from stronger signals but have a much improved signal-to-noise ratio because the antenna cancels noises arriving from above or beneath.

Stacked antennas are usually connected in phase, Fig. 1, to produce an additive signal at the transmission line. Noise components arriving above or beneath strike one element first and then, a half-wave later, a second, resulting in cancellation. The desired signal strikes broadside exciting both elements in-phase and by proper transmission line connection becomes additive. Two methods are shown. In the first drawing, feeders are transposed between elements putting both signals in-phase at the point the transmission line is attached. This system depends on half-wave spacing to give polarity shift. A second method is to feed at the center-point which will keep the transmission line point of connection the same distance from each element. This latter method is not as frequency-critical as the former.

Parasitic elements and various types of driven elements can be used. Fig. 1 shows stacked folded dipoles with reflectors. Whenever two in-phase elements are paralleled antenna resistance is halved.

For the stacked antenna shown 300-ohm line would run between elements and it would be opened at the center for attachment of the 150-ohm line for ideal match. Again it is important to stress that if the receiver has only a 300-ohm input match the receiver and let any mismatch which must occur be at the antenna.

 

 

Posted August 21, 2023
(updated from original post on 5/5/2017)

Copper Mountain Technologies Vector Network Analyzers - RF Cafe Website
Please Support My Advertisers!
Transcat | Axiom Test Equipment - RF Cafe Website
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Empower RF | Reactel | SF Circuits

Alliance Test | Isotec
KR Electronics (RF Filters) - RF Cafe Website

Johanson Technology Antennas - RF Cafe Website

Windfreak Technologies Frequency Synthesizers - RF Cafe Website
Tennode RF Connectors and Cables - RF Cafe Website

RF Electronic Stencils Symbols Visio Shapes Office

Exodus Advanced Communications Best in Class RF Amplifier SSPAs

Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my ridiculously low-priced products, all of which I created.

RF Cascade Workbook for Excel

RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio

RF & Electronics Symbols for Office

RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio

RF Workbench

These Are Available for Free

Espresso Engineering Workbook™

Smith Chart™ for Excel