September 1966 QST
Table
of Contents
Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics. See articles
from
QST, published December 1915 - present (visit ARRL
for info). All copyrights hereby acknowledged.
|
History keeps repeating itself. While
reading this c1966 "Radiomanship" article by Mr. Paul Amis you might think
it is a contemporary piece lamenting the lack of technical understanding - or even
interest in the technical aspects - of amateur radio equipment. Just as with the
perpetual frustration by seasoned hobbyist veterans of all fields, concern for younger
participants with their short attention spans and busyness with many other forms
of time-consuming distractions causes the aforementioned old-timers to loose precious
sleep. ...and yet our hobbies live on, albeit maybe under different manifestations
and rules. Interestingly, this might be the first time I have read in one of these
vintage QST magazines about computers capable of talking - or about computers
at all for that matter. Having only a relatively small number of vintage QST
issues, there may very well have been a predecessor.
"Radiomanship"
By Paul C. Amis, * W7RGL
There are those who say that the present-day radio amateur is little more than
an "appliance operator" who is unable or unwilling to understand the toys he plays
with. They point out, for instance, that the emergency communication aspect of our
activities has been withered by the blast of mobile CB units and imported Walkie-Talkies.
They equate the educational aspect of a modern ham station with that of a color-TV
set; each can provide some measure of mental upgrading, perhaps, but unless you
are a sponsor or manufacturer, there is little lasting benefit. At the drop of a
jaw, these malcontents will conclude that since, to their knowledge, modern hams
have been technically euchred out of the invention field, their utilitarian import
is approaching zero, that they occupy commercially desirable spectrum space, and,
therefore, are not worth saving.
While these observations may have some truth buried in them, the point remains
that the basic skill of amateur radio to establish and maintain communication continues
to be forgotten. That one primary art form tends to be glossed over as a pseudo-science,
or never observed in the first place. This accomplishment, call it Radiomanship,
is cultivated, to some degree, in every active amateur. It is the skill, or necessary
ability if you will, which separates the radio amateur from the citizen band and
the commercial operator. It has little or nothing to do with one's ability to copy
high-speed code or to acquire technical acumen; its growth is discrete from the
amount of expensive equipment purchased for the shack, or text books studied for
the mind. It is a communication awareness which is acquired by applied osmosis and
requires continual contact with jam-packed ham bands and a flighty ionosphere. The
handling of traffic from a high-power station, on a clear channel, or the sporadic
use of a transceiver over a five-block path on Channel 11, does not tend to cultivate
it. It blooms only under infernal interference, is fostered by sickly signals, and
feeds on heavy doses of adverse band conditions and static. Yet most of us who have
acquired a modicum of Radiomanship never fully realize it, much less understand
it. What makes a ham select one specific band, at one specific time, to make a certain
specific long-haul contact? Experience? Partly. Propagation theory? Partly. Skill?
Not necessarily. A sixth sense derived from long hours of observation plus an inborn
hunch? Undoubtedly. Have you ever noticed how often hamdom's top DXers can he found
on a normally" dead" band, at a normally "wrong" time of day, but at the "right"
time to work some rare DX who just happens to be there? Have you ever watched an
experienced phone operator dig through three or four layers of QRM during Field
Day to work stations whose signal substance borders on the ghostly? Have you ever
noticed that the strong Sweepstakes Contest leaders always work the answering station
who won't stay around if ignored? How does he know that a particular station should
be worked first? Have you ever watched a v.h.f. man work DX during a meteor shower
or sporadic E? He knows exactly where to point his beam; exactly when and how long
to call; and under the toughest of marginal contacts, knows exactly who called him,
and what was said. Have you ever noticed the touch that Radiomanship inspires? The
calloused hand which cannot be trusted to dry a delicate tea cup will tune a receiver
like a caress with the deft and sureness of a surgeon's scalpel.
This acquired ability to woo the fickle mistress of radio communication is probably
refined to its purest state by the radio amateur. He learns how to read un-readable
signals, to communicate on dead frequencies, to be a radio man under interference
circumstances bordering on the impossible. There are no books to learn this art
form; there are no courses of instruction which espouse it. It must be acquired
in the solitary clutter of a ham shack, with the heart ranging as it will beyond
the glowing window of the receiver dial.
In a world where technological advancements tend to outpace the individual, where
just running some device, whose design is totally beyond our ken, takes study and
application, the art of Radiomanship becomes a rarer thing. When a commercial or
military circuit cannot pass traffic over a given distance at all times, we provide
a more powerful transmitter. The operator does merely as he must - he uses the equipment
provided, or he reports that "communication is impossible due to propagational disturbances."
A radio amateur, while he may have no powerful transmitter or state-of-the-art equipment,
has, and is learning, the ethereal sixth sense of the true communicator. He makes
do with his equipment at hand, but he bolsters his ironmongery with the feeling
that such-and-such is the band to use, and that so-and-so is the time to try, and
that the other station, be he at the other end of the state, the country, or the
globe, will be waiting for him at that precise kilocyclic intersection.
In this day and age, a tape recorder or a computer can talk; but it still takes
skill to communicate.
Posted January 16, 2023 (updated from original
post on 3/24/2016)
|