|
August 1964 Popular Electronics
Table of Contents
Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics. See articles
from
Popular Electronics,
published October 1954 - April 1985. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.
|

Out of curiosity, I asked AI when around the 1964 timeframe
Jupiter would have been in the position indicated map in the article - early in
the year it responded. I adjusted TheSkyX software until Jupiter appeared where
shown. That was late March - early April 1964. This image shows the two maps
juxtaposed for alignment. Cool, non?
This 1964 Popular Electronics magazine article captures radio astronomy's pioneering spirit when
Jupiter's radio emissions were still a novel discovery (first detected only nine
years earlier). Dr. Smith's work demonstrated remarkable accessibility - using
modified commercial receivers rather than specialized microwave arrays typically
associated with radio astronomy. The piece highlights key challenges of early
planetary radio research: navigating ionospheric interference, coordinating
multi-site observations for better resolution, and operating in crowded
shortwave bands. Researchers were still theorizing causes (cyclotron radiation
in Jupiter's magnetic field) and practical applications (space navigation, solar
flare prediction). The invitation for amateurs to participate underscores how
this field remained open to citizen scientists during its formative years,
relying on conventional equipment rather than massive institutional
infrastructure. Amateurs in both astronomy and amateur radio have contributed
significantly to the field of radio astronomy.
DX'ing Jupiter

Signals from outer space? It wasn't known until recently, but
the Giant Planet broadcasts signals any ham or SWL can monitor.
By Scott Gibson
One evening last summer, radio astronomer Dr. Alexander G. Smith of the
University of Florida tuned his Japanese pocket BC/SW receiver to 18 megacycles
and heard radio signals from the planet Jupiter. He was not surprised; Jupiter's
characteristic wide-band, surf-breaking-on-the-beach sound is easy to distinguish
from the narrow-band, fading-in sound of a distant phone station or the staccato
crash of earth - made static.
Dr. Smith has been studying Jupiter's radiations for nine years. He generally
uses Collins receivers and directional beam antennas, but on 21 that particular
night an unusually severe noise storm in the atmosphere - of the giant planet produced
signals strong enough to be readily detected even by a pocket radio with a short
whip antenna.
You can hear radio signals from Jupiter, too - with nothing more than an ordinary
amateur or SWL receiver and a good antenna!
It wasn't known until 1955 that Jupiter radiates low-frequency radio signals
of considerable intensity. Most radio astronomers search the microwaves with intricate
low-noise receivers and elaborate antenna arrays, but Dr. Smith's 23-man research
group is able to use conventional communications receivers and familiar-looking
beam antennas thanks, to the excellent signal strengths and low frequencies involved
- 5 megacycles and up. In fact, Jupiter's signal strength increases the lower you
go in frequency; above 15 mc, the energy falls off as the fifth power of the frequency!

These familiar-looking antennas - from left to right, a corner
reflector, two four-element yagis mounted at angles and a five-element yagi - point
skyward toward Jupiter.

Collins and Hammarlund gear above - enough to delight any DX'er
- is connected to antennas at left for monitoring Jupiter's emissions from 5 to 30
mc.; Hallicrafters unit monitors WWV. Other equipment shown: three paper recorders
and a tape machine, all used to record Jupiter's signals for study.

Dr. Alexander G. Smith of the University of Florida's Radio Astronomy
Department adjusts 16-mm movie camera used to film Jupiter signals displayed on
scope screen of a panoramic receiver.
Although Jupiter's signals are heard in the very heart of the short-wave broadcasting
bands - Dr. Smith's group is currently observing 5, 10, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 27,
and 53 mc. - interference from earth-side stations is not as serious as you "might
expect from 15 mc. up, observations are made at selected hours of the night, usually
between midnight and dawn, when the sun-made ionosphere has thinned and no longer
deflects Jupiter's incoming signals. For the same reason, man-made signals are passed
on out into space rather than being reflected back down into the radio astronomer's
antennas. On the lower frequencies, however, the ionosphere never gets sufficiently
thin to pass out man-made signals, so the radio astronomers listen in the 10 kc.-wide-guard
bands on each side of W W V's carrier's. By international agreement these guard
bands carry no radio traffic-most of the time, anyway.
Even though QRM can be evaded on the lower frequencies, ionospheric deflection
of the incoming signals from Jupiter sets a limit on the lowest frequencies that
can be observed; below a critical frequency, the planet's signals are reflected
back into space. This critical frequency depends on both the density of the Ionosphere
and the angle between horizon, receiver, and Jupiter. If Jupiter is close to the
horizon, even 18-mc. signals may not get through; but if the planet is straight
overhead, much lower frequency signals are passed down to .'the receiving site.
Sunspots introduce another variable. The sunspots come and go in 11-year cycles.
During the sunspot maximum the ionosphere is much denser aid the lower frequencies
are blocked much more than they are at sunspot minimum. Since the next sunspot minimum
will occur is late 1964 or Early 1965, conditions are now good - and getting better
every day - for studying the lower frequency radiation from Jupiter.
Receiving the Giant Planet
The radio astronomers use ordinary Collins 75S receivers with the a.v.c. cut
off. For scientific reasons, three receiving areas are in action at the same time.
The main site is on the University of Florida campus and works directly with a second
site 35 miles away. In effect, these two antenna sites contribute to a common received
signal. Actually, the signals are photographed with high-speed cameras simultaneously
at both sites, and later the two images are combined from the negatives.
The two sets of antennas behave like segments of a radio telescope 35 miles in
diameter. In terms of resolving power, the results are as good as if you had a complete
radio. telescope of this diameter, although the amount of energy receives is much
less. The loss of signal is no problem, however, because the signals are very strong
stronger than any other extraterrestrial signals.
As both optical and radio telescopes are increased in diameter, it becomes possible
to get finer resolution of details, and Dr. Smith and one of his colleagues, Dr.
T. D. Carr, hope to be able to distinguish Jupiter's four separate radio sources
which have been predicted by statistical data.
The third station in the chain is located in Chile. In 1959, with the aid of
a grant from the National Science Foundation, a field station was built in Santiago
at the University of Chile to permit simultaneous observation of Jupiter from both
hemispheres. Because interference is not likely to occur in both hemispheres at
the same time, wasted observation time is minimized as much as possible, and if
there is a question as to whether a given signal is from Jupiter or just similar
sounding interference, the answer can usually be found by comparing records.
It is also possible that there are certain modifications in Jupiter's radiations
which might be caused by the earth's ionosphere and magnetic field; since the earth's
magnetic field is opposite in the two hemispheres, these effects can be sorted out
and it becomes possible to tell which are due to the radiation of the planet and
which are due to the earth's ionosphere and magnetic field. Because of more favorable
atmospheric conditions and less man-made interference. signals as low as 5 mc. can
be observed in Chile.
What Causes Radiation?
Since the earth's ionosphere is so reluctant to admit incoming low-frequency
signals, Dr. Smith has asked NASA to orbit a low-frequency receiver. This receiver,
circling high above the ionosphere, could record Jupiter signals that never reach
the earth's surface. An orbiting receiver might also tell us if radio-frequency
radiations are generated in the earth's own Van Allen radiation belts. Because the
earth's magnetic field is relatively weak, it is believed that any such radiations
would again be of too low a frequency to be passed through the ionosphere. The stronger
the magnetic field around a planet, the higher the frequency of planetary radiations.
On this basis, Jupiter's magnetic field is calculated to be ten times as strong
as the earth's. Study of the polarization of the received signals tends to confirm
this deduction.
Jupiter's radiations are far stronger than those of any other source except occasional
outbursts from the sun. Although Saturn is roughly the same size as Jupiter, it
is not yet certain that Saturn radiates at all in the short-wave bands; in any event,
the signals must be far weaker and less frequent. This lack of signals is possibly
due to Saturn's famous rings. They lie in the central plane of the probable magnetic
field and would tend to prevent the pole-to-pole circulation of particles, as must
occur in a radiation belt.
What causes this radio radiation and what significance does it have for us? Although
the exact cause is unknown, it is believed that the radio signals are the result
of "cyclotron radiation" emitted by solar particles trapped in Jupiter's powerful
magnetic field and spiraling back and forth just like the particles in the Van Allen
radiation belts around earth. These particles are spit out by the sun, part of the
outward flowing solar plasma. If this is true, then there must be powerful and dangerous
radiation belts around Jupiter just as there are around the earth, and space explorers
will have to be wary when in the vicinity of the planet.
The Jupiter signals may serve as guidance beacons some day. So far it has been
difficult to hit even the moon with a ballistic missile, demonstrating a great need
for guidance. Interplanetary explorers could use Jupiter's radio signals as a huge
radio beacon. Although the planet is not always "on the air," the transmissions
are frequent enough to be very useful as a means of correcting course during a long
flight.
Solar flares are one of the gravest dangers to space travelers. These are great
outbursts of radiation from the sun - unpredictable and extremely dangerous. If
some way could be found to predict the occurrence of these deadly radiation storms,
space travel would be much safer, just as ocean travel is much safer now that meteorologists
are able to predict the birth and movement of storms. There is evidence of a correlation
between solar flares and radio noise from Jupiter, and there is also a correlation
between the number of sunspots and radiation from Jupiter. Thus, there seems to
be some connection between solar phenomena and Jupiter's radio signals, so perhaps
the latter may be used as a means of predicting solar flares, just as approaching
terrestrial storms may be heralded by changes in atmospheric pressure.
Future research will include a study of the polarization of the Jupiter signals
which should give more information on the planet's magnetic field and the particles
it contains, plus an investigation of the curious spitting and popping signals occasionally
heard. These signals sound like the loud popping you hear when someone dials a telephone
in the next room and you have your receiver r.f. gain turned up high, and may be
due to the effect of our own ionosphere. A space satellite to be launched in the
near future will carry a transmitter radiating a 20-mc. c.w. signal. This known
steady signal will be compared with the Jupiter signal to see if the satellite signal
is broken up in the same way as the planet's signals occasionally are, thus giving
a clue to the effect of our own ionosphere on Jupiter's signal.
Interplanetary SWL'ing. If you would like to do a little interplanetary DX'-ing,
all you need is a reasonably good communications receiver and a good antenna. An
existing 14- or 21-mc. beam would be ideal, although a dipole will do, and even
a long-wire will bring in this DX when the signals are strong. You can readily identify
the Jupiter signals as described at the beginning of this article, and if you happen
to have a panoramic adapter, their 2- to 3-mc. wide envelope is easily distinguished
from the "spikes" of earthly radio signals.
Remember to consult your newspaper or almanac to learn approximately where in
the sky Jupiter is at the time. The higher overhead it is, the lower will be the
frequency of the signals coming through. The planet does not radiate continuously,
but only when one of its several noise sources is turned toward the earth, so a
little patience may be required.
The lower the frequency monitored, the more likely you are to hear Jupiter, for
both signal strength and rate of occurrence of outbursts are greater on the lower
frequencies.
Good DX!
|