Search RFC: |                                     
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
About | Sitemap | Homepage Archive
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™
Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Please Support My Advertisers!
RF Cafe Sponsors
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Alliance Test | Empower RF
Isotec | Reactel | SF Circuits

Formulas & Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics


Calvin & Phineas

kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Articles, Forums, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos


Artificial Intelligence

Entertainment

Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes

Parts & Services

1000s of Listings

        Software:

Please Donate
RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office
RF Symbols for Visio | RF Stencils for Visio
Espresso Engineering Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook - RF Cafe

CPW Calculation - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

ljoseph
Post subject: CPW Calculation Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:16 pm

Captain


Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:54 am
Posts: 13
Location: Dallas
Hello
With the following parameters, I am getting different answers with different tools.
H = 0.3mm
Er = 4.25
W = 0.56mm
T= 32.5um
gap = 0.35mm
Freq 1842 Mhz

With this Agilent Appcad gives 50.2 ohms. AWR Tx line gives 47 ohms.
Following online calculator gives 78 ohms.
http://www1.sphere.ne.jp/i-lab/ilab/tool/cpw_e.htm

Don't understand the reason for this difference.


Top

Jeanalmira
Post subject: Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:01 am

General


Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Singapore
Hi ljoseph,

the difference is the ground plane.
I believe that for your first calculation (AppCad and AWR) you included the groundplane (CPW ground)
While the online calculator is without ground plane.

you can double check the setting thru AppCad and also AWR (CPW and CPW ground).

Hope it helps.

Regards,
Jean


Top

imodelit_moderator
Post subject: Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:40 am

Captain


Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:01 am
Posts: 22
Dear ljoseph,

I'm with Jeanalmira in his opinion. As for the lower impedance values you used -most probably- Grounded-Coplanar. While the larger values is for the conventional coplanar waveguide -without lower ground plane-.

Kindly check this online applet, it is for conventional coplanar waveguide.
http://imodelit.com/ViewDetails.aspx?AID=190 Thanks.

Best Regards,
imodelit Moderator







Posted  11/12/2012
RF Cascade Workbook - RF Cafe