Search RFC: |                                     
Please support my efforts by ADVERTISING!
About | Sitemap | Homepage Archive
Serving a Pleasant Blend of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow™
Vintage Magazines
Electronics World
Popular Electronics
Radio & TV News
QST | Pop Science
Popular Mechanics
Radio-Craft
Radio-Electronics
Short Wave Craft
Electronics | OFA
Saturday Eve Post
Please Support My Advertisers!
RF Cafe Sponsors
Aegis Power | Centric RF | RFCT
Alliance Test | Empower RF
Isotec | Reactel | SF Circuits

Formulas & Data

Electronics | RF
Mathematics
Mechanics | Physics


Calvin & Phineas

kmblatt83@aol.com

Resources

Articles, Forums, Radar
Magazines, Museum
Radio Service Data
Software, Videos


Artificial Intelligence

Entertainment

Crosswords, Humor Cogitations, Podcast
Quotes, Quizzes

Parts & Services

1000s of Listings

        Software:

Please Donate
RF Cascade Workbook | RF Symbols for Office
RF Symbols for Visio | RF Stencils for Visio
Espresso Engineering Workbook
RF Electronic Stencils Symbols Visio Shapes Office

AD8309 - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

I.R
Post subject: AD8309
Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:05 am

Hi,

Our board has includes a limiter. The application is broadband:
30-500MHz. We use the AD8309 device. This device has an internal resistance of 1KOhm. Our source is 50Ohm. We therefore need to match between those 2 impedances. According to the datasheet the recommended way is to use a flux transformer. The impedance ratio is 16:1, the maximal bandwidth available for such impedances ratio is up to 130MHz (according to the numerous number of transformers we checked so far). To use a pad will dramatically reduce the SNR. Can anyone suggest an alternative way (besides cascading two 4:1 transformers)?

Thanks in advance
I.R


Top


Kirt Blattenberger
Post subject: Just some thoughts...
Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 11:43 pm
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Erie, PA
Unless I misunderstand your specs, the impedance ratio is actually 20:1, not 16:1. That means your transformer turns ratio should ideally be sqrt(20) = 4.47:1, or about 4.5:1. This can be implemented with a 9:2 transformer using integer turns.

Finding that transformer will be, as you stated, difficult. However, if you are going to need a large quantity, companies like Sprague Goodman and others can make a custom part for you. Alternately, if you only need a few, you could wind your own (keeping low IL across the band will be a chore).

http://www.spraguegoodman.com/890/890toc.html

Another approach might be a tradeoff of overall insertion loss where you implement part of the impedance transformation with a resistive pad and part with a transformer.

Yet another might be to use a high speed buffering opamp that can be set for a 50 ohm input and 1 kohm output and still maintain the dynamic range that you need.

Just some thoughts...


- Kirt B. :mrgreen:


Top
Profile

I.R
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:10 am

Thanks a lot Kirt,

The Application Engineer of Analog Devices suggested us a way to overcome this problem (actually it is mentioned in the data sheet) - To connect resistor of 52.3 ohm in series with 4.7nH inductor, this gives a flat match of 50 ohm up to a frequency of 1GHz.

I was thinking like you of using a fast op-amp (amazing how fast these devices are becoming)...but the solution appears to be much simpler.

Thanks again,

I.R



Posted  11/12/2012
RF Electronic Stencils Symbols Visio Shapes Office