Modern Radio Practice in Using Graphs and Charts
April 1932 Radio News Article
charts and nomographs to solve calculations is not as common in today's world of portable high-powered computers
as it was when computers used vacuum tubes or even mechanical gears. One exception might be the Smith chart, especially
in the lab or field. You can plug numbers into a programmable calculator or tablet app, but having the solution
presented in the form of a number gives you only that - a number. That's usually good enough, but if you are doing
troubleshooting or tweaking a design, being able to see how the value got to be what it is by seeing what's around
it can be very helpful. The Smith chart is a particularly good example when watching the complex impedance point
move around. The more experience you have, the less you need such devices, but newbies can really benefit from charts.
This article presents a chart (nomograph) that facilitates calculating two resistors or inductors in parallel, or
two capacitors in series according to the 1/XT = 1/X1 + 1/ X2.
of Contents]These articles are scanned and OCRed from old editions of the Radio & Television News magazine.
Here is a list of the Radio & Television News articles
I have already posted. As time permits, I will be glad to scan articles for you. All copyrights (if any) are hereby
Modern Radio Practice in Using Graphs and Charts
Part Four (see
Calculations in radio design work usually can be reduced to formulas represented as charts which
permit the solution of mathematical problems without mental effort. This series of articles presents a number of
useful charts and explains how others can be made
By John M. Borst
A chart for the calculation of
the total resistance of two branches or the total capacity of a series is so simple, convenient and easy to make
that the author has never been able to understand why it is not used more. In contrast to the chart which was described
last month there is nothing difficult about this one. Ordinary decimal scales are used and the calibrations as well
as the angles are easily found.
The formulas for the solution of our problems are
The similarity of these two equations makes the chart suitable for the solution of either one of them. All we
say in regard to one equation or its solution is equally applicable to the other one.
In the February, 1932,
issue of RADIO NEWS it was shown that this type of equation could be solved with the aid of an alignment chart consisting
of three scales converging at one point. If the two angles formed at this point are equal and of 60 degrees, then
the same size unit can be used throughout. It is not always convenient to make the angles of 60 degrees for a rather
wide sheet of paper becomes necessary.
Fortunately, the two angles can be "anything." If the angle is a,
then the modulus of the slanting scales should be
where Mx is the modulus of the center scale.
paper is used, the divisions are already present; it is only necessary to draw the three lines.
be seen that in the case of a large resistor, shunted by a small one, the ruler, laid across the chart for the reading
of the total, will make a very sharp angle with all three scales and consequently the accuracy is not so good. This
can be obviated by making another chart with unequal angles for this kind of solution. The relation still holds
when the angles are unequal. This is proven at the end of this article.
The two types of charts have been
united and you find them both in Figure 1. The scales marked A belong to the equal-angle chart and are intended
for the solution of the average problem. The scales marked B form the scale of the unequal-angle type. When the
two resistors in the problem are widely different, this is the chart to use.
If the range is not large enough
for a particular problem, all values on the three scales can be multiplied or divided by any number.
1. Let it be required to find what is the resistance equivalent to 100 ohms and 150 ohms in parallel. A transparent
ruler laid across the chart so that it connects 100 on one slanting scale and 150 on the other, crosses the center
line at 60. This is the resistance sought.
Problem 2. Suppose there were three resistors in parallel, for
instance, 150, 100 and 40 ohms. In this case, first determine the resistance of two branches in parallel, say 100
and 150; our problem No.1. Then the equivalent resistance, 60 ohms, is in parallel with 40 ohms and the chart is
used a second time. Draw a line from 60 on one slanting scale to 40 on the other and find, in the center, the intersection
at 24. This is the resistance of the three branches in parallel.
Problem 3. What is the capacity of 120
and 8 micro-microfarads in series? Since here the two condensers are so widely different, it is best to use chart
B. A line drawn from 120 on the right slanting scale to 8 on the extreme left scale crosses B2 at 7.6 micro-microfarads
approximately. This is the capacity of the combination-smaller than the smallest.
Figure 1. This chart and a ruler are all that you need for the solution of total resistance of resistor branches
and for the solution of total capacity for condensers in series
Chart Solves Resistance and Capacity Problems
It is of course necessary to read the
same units on all scales. They should be all micro-microfarads or all micro-farads for one particular problem.
Some equations, frequently used in optics, are of the same form as those here treated and therefore can
be solved with the aid of the same chart.
The well-known formula, giving the relation between focal length
of a lens and the distances of image and object, is
where f is the focal distance, i the image distance and o the object distance. Read f on the middle scales:
A2 or B2.
A second one is the formula for the focal length of a system of two or more lenses.
where F is the focal length of the system and f1 f2are
the focal lengths of the individual lenses making up the system. In this case F is to be read on the middle scale.
In Figure 2 are shown three scales converging at one point and with the angles p and q unequal. It is required
to find the relation between the segments OA, OX and OB when A, X and B are on a straight line.
is found in the same way as in previous examples, in the March and February issues of RADIO NEWS.
two rectangular triangles ACX and XDB. Since these triangles are similar, we can write
OB.OX sin q - OA.OB cos p sin q
= OA.OB sin p cos q - OA.OX
Solving for OX:
OX (OA sin p + OB sin q)
= OA.OB (cos q sin p
+ cos p sin q)
From trigonometry: cos q sin p + cos p sin q = sin (p+q). Substituting this in the equation (1) and writing
it in the desired form:
When the modulus on the three scales is also taken in consideration, OX, OA and OB must be replaced
by their respective values
The formula then becomes
Figure 3 shows the principle of constructing the symmetrical
chart. A constructional line drawn through division 50 on the center scale and perpendicular to it, intersects both
slanting scales at division 100. All other lines, parallel to it, pass through divisions on the slanting scales
which indicate twice that of the one in the center.
In the case of a non-symmetrical scale, the construction
is made as in Figure 4. The constructional lines form parallelograms and the numbers are the same at three angles.
These constructions are easy to understand, for in each case they are really sample calculations as we described
last month, under the subhead, "The Automatic Method."