April 1932 Radio News
[Table
of Contents]
These articles are scanned and OCRed from old editions of the Radio & Television News magazine. Here is a list of the Radio & Television
News articles I have already posted. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.

Using charts and nomographs
to solve calculations is not as common in today's world of portable highpowered computers as it was when computers
used vacuum tubes or even mechanical gears. One exception might be the Smith chart, especially in the lab or field.
You can plug numbers into a programmable calculator or tablet app, but having the solution presented in the form
of a number gives you only that  a number. That's usually good enough, but if you are doing troubleshooting or
tweaking a design, being able to see how the value got to be what it is by seeing what's around it can be very
helpful. The Smith chart is a particularly good example when watching the complex impedance point move around.
The more experience you have, the less you need such devices, but newbies can really benefit from charts. This
article presents a chart (nomograph) that facilitates calculating two resistors or inductors in parallel, or two
capacitors in series according to the 1/X_{T} = 1/X_{1} + 1/ X_{2}.
Modern Radio Practice in Using Graphs and Charts
Part Four
(see
Part 9)
Calculations in radio design work usually can be reduced to formulas represented as charts which permit the solution
of mathematical problems without mental effort. This series of articles presents a number of useful charts and
explains how others can be made
By John M. Borst
A chart for the calculation of the total resistance
of two branches or the total capacity of a series is so simple, convenient and easy to make that the author has
never been able to understand why it is not used more. In contrast to the chart which was described last month
there is nothing difficult about this one. Ordinary decimal scales are used and the calibrations as well as the
angles are easily found.
The formulas for the solution of our problems are
The similarity of these two equations makes the chart suitable for the solution of either one of them. All
we say in regard to one equation or its solution is equally applicable to the other one.
In the February,
1932, issue of RADIO NEWS it was shown that this type of equation could be solved with the aid of an alignment
chart consisting of three scales converging at one point. If the two angles formed at this point are equal and
of 60 degrees, then the same size unit can be used throughout. It is not always convenient to make the angles
of 60 degrees for a rather wide sheet of paper becomes necessary.
Fortunately, the two angles can be "anything."
If the angle is a, then the modulus of the slanting scales should be
where M
_{x} is the modulus of the center scale.
When crosssection
paper is used, the divisions are already present; it is only necessary to draw the three lines.
It will
be seen that in the case of a large resistor, shunted by a small one, the ruler, laid across the chart for the
reading of the total, will make a very sharp angle with all three scales and consequently the accuracy is not
so good. This can be obviated by making another chart with unequal angles for this kind of solution. The relation
still holds when the angles are unequal. This is proven at the end of this article.
The two types of charts
have been united and you find them both in Figure 1. The scales marked A belong to the equalangle chart and are
intended for the solution of the average problem. The scales marked B form the scale of the unequalangle type.
When the two resistors in the problem are widely different, this is the chart to use.
If the range is
not large enough for a particular problem, all values on the three scales can be multiplied or divided by any
number.
Problem 1. Let it be required to find what is the resistance equivalent to 100 ohms and 150 ohms
in parallel. A transparent ruler laid across the chart so that it connects 100 on one slanting scale and 150 on
the other, crosses the center line at 60. This is the resistance sought.
Problem 2. Suppose there were
three resistors in parallel, for instance, 150, 100 and 40 ohms. In this case, first determine the resistance
of two branches in parallel, say 100 and 150; our problem No.1. Then the equivalent resistance, 60 ohms, is in
parallel with 40 ohms and the chart is used a second time. Draw a line from 60 on one slanting scale to 40 on
the other and find, in the center, the intersection at 24. This is the resistance of the three branches in parallel.
Problem 3. What is the capacity of 120 and 8 micromicrofarads in series? Since here the two condensers
are so widely different, it is best to use chart B. A line drawn from 120 on the right slanting scale to 8 on
the extreme left scale crosses B2 at 7.6 micromicrofarads approximately. This is the capacity of the combinationsmaller
than the smallest.
Chart Solves Resistance and Capacity Problems
Figure 1. This chart and a ruler are all that you need for the solution of total resistance of resistor
branches and for the solution of total capacity for condensers in series
It is of course necessary to
read the same units on all scales. They should be all micromicrofarads or all microfarads for one particular
problem.
Some equations, frequently used in optics, are of the same form as those here treated and therefore
can be solved with the aid of the same chart.
The wellknown formula, giving the relation between focal
length of a lens and the distances of image and object, is
where f is the focal distance, i the image distance and o the object distance. Read f on the middle scales:
A2 or B2.
A second one is the formula for the focal length of a system of two or more lenses.
where F is the focal length of the system and f
_{1} f
_{2}are
the focal lengths of the individual lenses making up the system. In this case F is to be read on the middle scale.
In Figure 2 are shown three scales converging at one point and with the angles p and q unequal. It is required
to find the relation between the segments OA, OX and OB when A, X and B are on a straight line.
The solution
is found in the same way as in previous examples, in the March and February issues of RADIO NEWS.
Draw
the two rectangular triangles ACX and XDB. Since these triangles are similar, we can write
Removing fractions:
OB.OX sin q  OA.OB cos p sin q
= OA.OB sin p cos q  OA.OX
sin p
Solving for OX:
OX (OA sin p + OB sin q)
= OA.OB (cos q sin
p + cos p sin q)
or
From trigonometry: cos q sin p + cos p sin q = sin (p+q). Substituting this in the equation (1) and writing
it in the desired form:
When the modulus on the three scales is also taken in consideration, OX, OA and OB must be replaced
by their respective values
xM
_{x}, aM
_{a}
and bM
_{b} The formula then becomes
Geometrical Construction
Figure 3 shows the principle of constructing the symmetrical chart. A constructional line drawn through division
50 on the center scale and perpendicular to it, intersects both slanting scales at division 100. All other lines,
parallel to it, pass through divisions on the slanting scales which indicate twice that of the one in the center.
In the case of a nonsymmetrical scale, the construction is made as in Figure 4. The constructional lines
form parallelograms and the numbers are the same at three angles.
These constructions are easy to understand,
for in each case they are really sample calculations as we described last month, under the subhead, "The Automatic
Method."
Nomographs Available on RF Cafe:

Decibel Nomograph

Voltage and Power Level Nomograph
 Voltage, Current, Resistance,
and Power Nomograph
 Resistor
Selection Nomogram
 Resistance
and Capacitance
 Capacitance
Nomograph
 Earth Curvature Nomograph
 Coil Design Nomograph

Coil Inductance Nomograph
 Antenna Gain Nomograph

Resistance and
Reactance Nomograph
Posted October 4, 2013