Once frequency modulation (FM) began making inroads in the commercial radio broadcast world, it wasn't long until the pundits were writing eulogies for amplitude modulation (AM). There was/is no denying the superiority of FM in terms of both **n**atural (QR**N**; e.g., lightning, static, arcing contacts) and **m**anmade (QR**M**; e.g., another radio, Wi-Fi, cellular) interference, but there was already a large installed base of AM radio receivers (and broadcast transmitters) that satisfied their owners' expectations for listening to news, ball games, music, and the well-established repertoire of drama and comedy shows. FM radios were generally more expensive to manufacture, operate, and repair than AM - at least early on, especially since typically FM sets included AM as well. This particular article from a 1944 issue of *Radio News* magazine discusses class C amplifiers, which is a mode of operation where the circuit is conducting for less than 180° (half a cycle) when a sinewave is applied. When properly implemented, class C operation is more efficient than class A (360° conduction) or class B (180° conduction), or class AB (180° to <360° conduction). The principles are the same whether vacuum tubes or transistors are used. Modulating Class "C" Amplifiers By M. Dean Post, Senior Instructor, AAFTTC
Fig. 1 - Diagram showing method of plate modulating a class "C" r.f. amplifier. Important factors to be considered when employing amplitude modulation in class "C" plate modulated r.f. amplifiers. Enthusiasm for frequency modulation is sweeping the nation, but amplitude modulation has not yet outlived its usefulness. It is, in fact, still the most common method of inserting intelligence into a carrier wave. From some of the questions asked by radio men, it is apparent that the subject is none too thoroughly understood even at this late date, and so long as such modulation is used, it deserves as much understanding as possible. There are some excellent texts on this type of modulation, but it is intended here to present some succinct facts without digressing too much into the realms of abstract theory. There are several means of amplitude modulating a class "C" amplifier among them being plate modulation, grid modulation, cathode modulation, and combinations of all three. The first type will be used here for purposes of discussion, since all types accomplish essentially the same thing. Fig. 1 shows a typical schematic diagram, simplified for explanation. The r.f. class "C" amplifier is so designed that the r.f. driving voltage appearing across the grid resistor R is rectified by grid-cathode current flow and causes a large d.c. voltage to appear between grid and ground, negative at the grid end. The amplitude of this potential is such that the amplifier is biased from two to four times cutoff. The audio signal is amplified by the modulator tube V2, and this signal appears across the secondary of the modulation transformer T. Conditions now have been set up for modulation. The audio signal has been inserted in series with the d.c. high voltage supplying the plate of the r.f. amplifier, so that it will alternately add and subtract from the total voltage appearing on the plate of V1, as shown in Fig. 2. It is apparent that, if the audio signal is of sufficient amplitude, it can be made to raise the total plate voltage to twice its normal value, and lower it to zero. This condition will result in 100% modulation of the carrier wave. Thus, an important requirement has been revealed: the peak output voltage across the secondary of T (Fig. 1) must equal the d.c. voltage applied to V1 if 100% modulation is to be realized.
Fig. 2 - Audio signal, which is inserted in the plate of the r.f. amplifier tube. The result of such efforts is to vary the carrier output in the manner of Fig. 3. For ease of drawing, this figure is a graph of the envelope of modulation, and does not include the individual cycles of r.f. energy that make up the body of the envelope. This curve is that of either current or voltage - not power - and is the one shown on the face of a cathode-ray oscilloscope when r.f. energy is applied to the vertical plates. The percentage modulation can be obtained from the expression where the voltages are as shown in Fig. 3. (It should be noted that the envelope above and below the zero axis is symmetrical and sinusoidal, since a sine wave was used initially as the audio signal. Thus, for detection purposes it is only necessary to remove the lower half of the envelope to obtain the original signal.) The envelope of Fig. 3, however, does not tell the entire story. There remains, among other things, the problem of determining how much power is required to accomplish 100% modulation, and what happens to the radiated power. The above envelope follows the curve E = E_{0} (1 + m·sin ωt) ........................ (1) where m is the modulation factor (1 for 100%). This expression simply states that the carrier E_{0} is being modulated by a sine wave. Now, If it is remembered that power is proportional to the square of voltage, it can be stated that E^{2} = E_{0}^{2} (1 + m·sin ωt)^{2} = E_{0}^{2} (1 + 2m·sin ωt + m^{2}·sin^{2}ωt). (2) If equation (2) is plotted over one cycle, the envelope of modulated power will be obtained as in Fig. 4. This curve seldom is seen in plotted form, since the voltage envelope is more readily adaptable to percentage-modulation measurements. However, Fig. 4 gives a clearer picture of the power relations than otherwise can be obtained, and serves to illustrate actual operating conditions. For convenience in calculating, values have been assigned-a carrier power of 300 watts being taken for a basis. The curve of Fig. 4 is striking in its dissimilarity to the voltage envelope of Fig. 3. Note the wide space of practically no power between cycles. This vacancy is caused by two things: 1. The negative voltage peaks of modulation have reduced the r.f. peak power greatly. 2. The time that each cycle of r.f. power flows has been narrowed, since the pulses of r.f. energy are very narrow at their tips.
Fig. 3 - Voltage envelope of the r.f. carrier when 100 percent modulated. The cumulation of these two items results in the extreme necking out of the envelope. The strangeness of the remainder of the curve is accounted for by referring back to equation (2), which tells us that there are three components present: the steady carrier, the modulating signal, and a double-frequency component which is represented by the sin^{2}ωt portion. Apparently the process of modulation has added something new to the carrier-sidebands. These sidebands are composed of sum and difference frequencies (carrier plus audio, carrier minus audio) and convey all the intelligence of the modulation. Thus, the carrier is truly named, since it contributes nothing towards the information contained in the wave. The carrier could be removed without loss to the intelligence conveyed, and in some types of transmission this is done. It is interesting, at this point, to determine how the total power has been altered by modulation. Fig. 4 shows that the peak power is four times the unmodulated power-and this we would have known previously, since the plate voltage was doubled and this means in itself four times the power. If the total area (power) under the curve is compared with the total area enclosed by a full cycle of unmodulated carrier, it will be apparent immediately that the total energy has increased by half. Thus the total modulated power is 1.5 times the unmodulated power. Now, if the total modulated energy is 1/2 greater than the unmodulated power, the additional energy must have been supplied by the modulator. Again an important item comes into view-for 100% modulation, the audio system must be capable of supplying a power which is half the r.f. power. Furthermore, all the modulator supplies is sidebands. The expression for the entire waveform of the modulated r.f. voltage is (3) This slightly formidable-appearing expression is really quite simple. It consists of the carrier power (sin ω_{c}t), the lower sideband which has a maxi-mum amplitude of m/2 and is composed of the carrier frequency We minus the signal frequency ω_{s} and an upper sideband with the same maximum amplitude but whose position in frequency is the sum of ω_{c} and ω_{s}. The equation says that the amplitude of the sidebands is 1/2 that. If the carrier when m = 1. Since power is proportional to the square of the amplitude, the sideband power is 1/4 plus 1/4, or a total of 1/2 that of the over-all power. It has been shown already that the total power increase at 100% modulation is 1/2; therefore the two sidebands must contribute the extra 1/2. Thus the ratio This proves that the sideband power is 33 1/3%; therefore, the carrier must contribute the remaining 66 2/3% of the energy. From equation (2), it is apparent that the maximum power of the side-bands is proportional to m^{2}. It is thus important to keep the modulation as high as possible, since the total energy in these sidebands will decrease rapidly as the percentage modulation is reduced. For example, if the modulation were reduced from 100% to 80%, the intelligence-bearing sideband power would be reduced to 64% of its former value. This clearly shows that a high-power carrier poorly modulated would be no louder at the receiver than a weak carrier fully modulated. Fig. 4 is somewhat puzzling at first glance in that the carrier has been engulfed entirely in the total energy under the envelope, and is no longer distinguishable. As a matter of fact, it is impossible to state from such a curve that the carrier is actively engaged in producing 66 2/3% of the total energy. This conclusion must be drawn from knowledge of the sideband situation: if the sidebands supplied by the modulator are accounting for 33 1/3% of the total energy, the carrier must therefore be supplying the remainder.
Fig. 4 - Power envelope of the r.f. carrier when 100 percent modulated. The dotted line marked 450 watts in Fig. 4 represents the power to which the carrier would have to be raised if the continuous unmodulated power were to equal the 300-watt carrier fully modulated, and is the average value of energy over one cycle of modulation. It thus is evident that the class "C" amplifier, under modulation, is subjected to heavier loads. If the r.f. tube is to be modulated 100 %, it must be operated at lower plate voltages than at telegraph or unmodulated conditions since the plate dissipation is increased. The tube must be capable of handling twice the peak modulating voltage - otherwise, tube saturation will be reached and exceeded, causing over-heating and overmodulation. This brings up other items - those of downward modulation and overmodulation. When the class "C" amplifier is 100% modulated, the average d.c. current, as indicated by the meter M in Fig. 1, will not change its reading, or will just barely flicker upwards. This can be seen from Fig. 2; when the peak modulating signal is just equal to the d.c. voltage applied to the r.f. amplifier plate, the average increase (over one cycle) of voltage is zero. Therefore the average d.c. current flow produced will be independent of modulation. If the modulating signal is too large, it will drive heavily in the positive direction, and be cut off at the negative portion, thereby increasing the over-all d.c. voltage and causing more d.c. current to flow. This results in cutting off the modulated power for excessive periods between cycles, which causes distortion and the production of spurious sidebands. Many operators have operated their transmitters with considerable increase in d.c. plate current on modulation, thinking they were just "hitting it harder." They were - but with negative results. When a lamp load was coupled to the output coil, they were surprised to see the power decrease on modulation. As has just been mentioned, too heavy modulating signals will cut off the power between cycles, the amount depending on the extent of overmodulation. Thus the average power is reduced, even though the d.c. plate current has increased; and downward modulation results. In this case, downward modulation is the result of overmodulation. It is interesting to note from Fig. 4 that the audio modulator must supply peak power of four times its normal power - which would possibly lead one to conclude, offhand, that the audio system must be larger than previously thought. Further investigation will clear up the matter. The points X and X' are the half-power points of the curve - the points at which power has 0.707 of its maximum value. (This is a standard investigation point.) The time of power flow between these two points is 90°, or 1/4, of a complete cycle. Thus, the audio system must supply its normal power for one cycle, or 4 times that power for 1/4, cycle - identical conditions. However, this power is required only for sine wave conditions. The power requirements for speech are generally less, because of the narrow wave forms inherent in speech. The peak requirements remain the same, but the average audio power is reduced to some 30% of the carrier instead of 50%. A method of approximating the percentage modulation is to observe the current rise in the antenna or feeder circuit, on modulation. If the total power at 100% modulation is 1.5 times the unmodulated carrier power, then P = I^{2}R and 1.5 = I^{2} (since R remains constant it can be considered as 1) Therefore I = 1.225, or the current has increased 22.5% for 100% sinewave modulation. Linearity is important in modulation, and is dependent on the grid bias and load impedance. A high load impedance. as computed by Z = E/I, where E is the d.c. plate voltage on the r.f. tube and I is the d.c. plate current, gives more linearity but lower output, and vice versa. Care must be taken in the selection of r.f. tubes, and in the grid bias. If reasonable power output with low minimum plate voltage is required, a tube with a low amplification factor is necessary. The driving power required for good linearity increases rapidly as 100% modulation is approached, hence the driving source of r.f. power exciting the r.f. amplifier must have good regulation. Posted November 26, 2019 |