The Antenna Research Laboratory
March 1950 Radio & Television News
1950, say the author of this story, "No longer are 'aerials' merely
required to transfer electromagnetic energy into space," in reference
to airborne platforms. Following great advancements in radio and radar
technology during World War II, great interest lied in what would
later become referred to as 'stealth' technology and in secure communications.
The transition of aircraft speeds into the realm of supersonic also
mandated that projections beyond the main airframe outline be either
eliminated or very much minimized. The long cable aerials that stretched
from the cockpit area to the tip of the vertical fin, and the round
direction finding antennas hanging from below could not be accommodated
at airspeeds above about 300 knots. The aerodynamic drag would
be excessive and the forces would tear the antennas apart. Douglas Aircraft
set up one of the first antenna measurement laboratories specifically
to address those issues both for airborne and shipboard platforms.
March 1950 Radio & Television News|
of Contents]These articles are scanned and OCRed from old editions of the Radio & Television News magazine. Here
is a list of the Radio & Television News articles
I have already posted. All copyrights (if any) are hereby acknowledged.
Thanks to Terry W. for providing this article.
See all available vintage
Radio News articles.
The Antenna Research Laboratory
By Joseph M. Boyer, Consulting Engineer
Douglas Aircraft's laboratory eliminates costly full-scale experiments
by using tiny replicas in solving complicated antenna design problems.
Fig. 1. Tiny crystal receiver shown in engineer's right hand,
is used to detect signals from model antenna. Plate on side
of model plane is removable to permit receivers to be installed
within the hollow fuselage of plane.
Never before in the history of radio has interest in the antenna
beam been at such a feverish pitch! No longer are "aerials" merely required
to transfer electromagnetic energy into space. Experts today, working
with surrealistic shapes of metal and plastic, are molding radiated
energy into the precisely shaped beams needed for the varied classes
of radar - for highly eavesdrop-proof communication links, or even changing
the beam's contour from instant-to-instant, automatically following
the boiling vagaries of the Heaviside layer.
The center of all
such investigation is the antenna research laboratory. Here antenna
engineers work with worlds in miniature. Out on the model antenna range
of one such laboratory it is not uncommon to see a complete scale replica
of a television station: the tiny buildings, the accurately-made antenna
towers, even the green rolling hills of the surrounding country. This
Lilliputian model slowly revolves on a turntable, a large horn-type
radiator some distance away "illuminating" it with microwave signals.
The miniature antennas of the model station detect such energy and feed
it back to high gain amplifiers in the laboratory. Thus, as the model
turns, automatic plotting instruments draw an accurate trace of the
radiation pattern of the station for later study. Such model tests save
costly cut-and-try procedures previously made on full scale installations.
Even more important, in view of our National Preparedness Program,
is the investigation of aircraft antennas. With aircraft now operating
both near and beyond the speed of sound, no object of any kind is permitted
to project from the sleek, polished metal skin to add parasitic drag.
This requirement is a death warrant for the numerous masts and wires
which once were draped lavishly over aircraft exteriors. In the high-pressure
search for distinctly new antenna types which may be faired flush into
the skin of a high speed airplane, several of the large airframe manufacturers
have aided the radio art immeasurably by taking the lead in such research.
In order to see, at first hand, the evolution of a new antenna, a visit
was made to the El Segundo, California antenna laboratory of the Douglas
Aircraft Company which pioneered in this field. Here, work begins with
the presentation of the Navy specifications to the aircraft antenna
Such specifications call for a v.h.f. communications
antenna. This unit is to be mounted flush within the skin of a high
speed carrier type fighter, yet provide full 360-degree coverage about
the horizon. When used for transmitting, the antenna must produce most
of its signal in a zone approximately twenty degrees above and below
the airplane. Efficiency must be equal to the older type protruding
antenna because airborne power requirements are stringent. Finally,
as if to complete the designer's frustration, such an antenna must be
capable of operating from 300 to 5901 megacycles while remaining
matched to the coaxial transmission line feeding it. Specifically, it
must not exceed a voltage standing wave ratio of 2 to 1.
resourceful engineer begins a strenuous period of reading the available
technical literature, making rough preliminary calculations, and weighing
and discarding a number of configurations which come to mind. In this
process the crude pencil sketches which litter his desk would be unrecognizable
to prewar engineers. There is not a sign of wires or porcelain insulators.
One sketch may show a small square portion of the metal skin isolated
from the surrounding surface and fed by a tapered funnel section of
coaxial line. Or perhaps a flat disc of polystyrene a foot or so in
diameter is shown, excited at its center by a sphere of silver designed
to function as a wide-band dipole.
Fig. 2. Diagram shows position of model aircraft
and rotation axis for each of the three principal radiation pattern
during pattern study.
Finally, the antenna designer
may feel he has what is needed. Before he makes a preliminary shop drawing
he must refine his design. This step involves extremely complex calculations.
For some such problems he must discard his slide rule, set up the equations
he wishes solved, and pass them on to electronic or mechanical computing
machines. Satisfied that his "brain child" has a good chance of success,
the engineer authorizes the experimental shop to fabricate a full size
antenna and pass it on to the antenna laboratory for measurements.
Fig. 3. Typical aircraft antenna radiation pattern. The pattern
shown was photo. graphed on the screen of antenna range cathode-ray
"pattern painter." Magnetic deflection coils move in synchronization
with rotation of model under study, tracing out an accurate
polar diagram of antenna signal variation around the plane model.
Fig. 4. Operating and recording position. Shown are the v.h.f.
and microwave transmitters, power supplies, and switching panel.
In front of operator is a pen recorder and the Douglas cathode-ray
"pattern painter." The "full moon" labeling device is seen as
the white window below the cathode-ray tube.
Fig. 5. A coaxial slotted line in use. The slotted coaxial line
is used to measure the voltage standing wave ratio of the prototype
antenna. The radiator under test is mounted on the outside metal
surface of the wall, directly behind the Hewlett Packard Voltage
Standing Wave Ratio meter shown in photo.
The antenna laboratory
technician, highly-trained and experienced in this specialized field,
first may mount the prototype antenna upon a large ground plane. This
usually is a metal wall forming one side or the roof of the laboratory
building. In some cases the antenna may actually be mounted into a full
scale wire cloth mock-up of the aircraft itself. A precision section
of slotted coaxial transmission line (Fig. 5) is connected in series
with the antenna and a laboratory v.h.f. oscillator. Beginning at one
end of the frequency range to be covered by the antenna, the technician
makes measurements of the voltage standing wave ratio in the transmission
line. If the antenna is a perfect match there will be no change in the
measured voltage from one end of the transmission line to the other.
Such "flat" lines, however, are rarely encountered. There usually is
a small v.s.w.r, but it must be under the called-for 2:1 ratio. If the
designer has done his job properly this condition will be met over the
entire frequency range desired. So far so good, but more hurdles remain
to be cleared.
Once more an order goes to the experimental model
shop: "Fabricate one 1/20th scale model of the antenna for range pattern
tests." The men who receive this assignment are not ordinary machinists
or metalsmiths. They are, for the most part, former instrument makers
used to working with tiny precision parts under a powerful lens. They
are fantastically ingenious in devising ways of soldering and welding
parts the size of a pin head into place within complex assemblies, of
bending and twisting metal into shape while it is glowing in the flame
of an alcohol lamp. An idea of the difficulty of their job can be obtained
when it is realized that ordinary RG 8/U coaxial cable reduced to 1/20th
scale is the size of store string. The inner conductor of such cable
is the diameter of a human hair, yet must be soldered to the minute
antenna without melting an extremely thin, easily-destroyed polyethylene
sheath which insulates the assembly. Upon completing his exacting task,
the model shop craftsman places the tiny antenna into the metal skin
of a previously prepared 1/20th scale model of the aircraft in which
it is intended to see service.
Radiation Pattern Measurements
Briefly, the basic idea behind the use of the model antenna
pattern range is this: an aircraft operates far from the earth. The
only environment which affects the antenna on the airplane is the configuration
of the craft itself. Any attempts to measure radiation patterns on a
full size aircraft resting on the earth would be futile. Patterns taken
by means of flight tests are not only prohibitively expensive, difficult
to measure and interpret, but usually end in doubtful results. However,
by reducing the aircraft to 1/20th or 1/40th of the full scale dimensions
it is possible to mount it from 40 to 60 wavelengths from the ground.
This can be done because the operating frequencies must also be multiplied
by 20 or 40 to keep in step with the model dimension change. That such
theory is correct, when suitable precautions are taken, has been demonstrated
The scaled-down model aircraft, complete with
its test antenna, is mounted upon a special dielectric tower, the base
of which rests on a motor-driven turntable. Within the hollow belly
of the little plane is a simple receiver usually consisting of an impedance
matching transformer and a silicon crystal detector or hot wire bolometer.
With the tower placed as many as 100 wavelengths from the laboratory
building, technicians energize a tunable Klystron transmitter which
excites a large horn type antenna projecting toward the model through
the wall of the laboratory. The transmitter's signal is amplitude modulated
by a square wave with a repetition rate of 1000 cycles. A square wave
is needed to avoid frequency modulation of the Klystron. Operating frequency
is carefully adjusted to be 20 or 40 times the full scale point in the
spectrum where the antenna is intended to function.
to Fig. 2 will make clear the patterns to be described. The antenna
specialist refers to such patterns as "cuts." The first "cut" is made
by slowly rotating the model so that every portion of the plane's horizontal
axis is exposed to the radio beam from the laboratory transmitting horn
antenna. The model on the tower is then turned 90 degrees and again
rotated by means of the turntable, exposing its nose, belly, topside
surface, and tail, to the beam. Finally, a "cut" is made presenting
the wingtips, belly, and topside surface of the model. This triad of
cuts - the horizontal, longitudinal vertical, and transverse vertical,
are fundamental in any pattern investigation and quickly tell if the
radiation pattern of a new antenna is going to meet specifications.
At least the three patterns just described must be made at frequent
intervals over the simulated radio spectrum in which the antenna is
going to operate. An antenna may frequently have the desired radiation
pattern at one end of its frequency range and fail miserably at the
Leaving the antenna designer for the moment
with his problem let us enter the laboratory building proper and investigate
the equipment used to study the radiation characteristics of antennas.
Several racks of audio amplifiers are the first instruments seen. These
are quite special items. There are preamplifiers capable of boosting
the few millivolts or so of signal received from the model to about
10 or 20 volts. This piece of equipment is linear in response and features
a tuned feedback network which permits the amplifier to operate with
full gain only at 1000 cycles. All other signals of random frequency
and noise are sharply attenuated. The output of the linear preamplifier
drives a logarithmic amplifier which is also sharply tuned to 1000 cycles.
Logarithmic response is desired so as to properly record variations
in the model signal which may extend over 50 decibels or more. To graphically
present the radiation pattern several different types of recorders are
The most common is a so-called polar recorder in which a pen is driven
by signal variations from the model through the use of a servo-mechanism.
In appearance this unit may resemble an automatic phonograph record
changer. A circular piece of polar graph paper is placed upon its turntable
and centered by means of a pinpoint of light at the center. The paper
edges are clamped down by means of small Alnico magnets. Rotation of
the recorder turntable is synchronized by means of selsyns to turn in
step with the model out on the pattern range. When the model is rotated
the servo-driven pen moves back and forth on a radius, tracing out the
Fig. 6. General view of antenna model pattern range. A scale
model of the Douglas "Skyraider" is shown mounted on the motor
driven dielectric tower. The large electromagnetic horn antenna
to the right is being turned to change electric polarization
of signal to model. Smaller horn to the left of the picture
covers the three centimeter frequency range.
Fig. 7. Scale model aircraft and antenna shown in process of
construction. Craftsman in foreground solders a connection in
minute cavity type slot antenna. The 1/20th scale aircraft model
shown is of wood.
Also used is a cathode-ray pattern painter illustrated
in Fig. 4. This instrument has several important advantages over the
pen type recorders. One of the most valuable is lack of mechanical inertia.
There are occasions when a radiation pattern being recorded varies from
a deep null to maximum signal intensity within a fraction of a degree
of rotation. Even for the slow speeds at which the model turns (3/4
to 1 r.p.m.) this condition requires the pen to whip over the graph
paper at an exceptionally fast rate. The consequent lack of response
and "overshooting" of the pen distort such patterns.
is absent in the cathode-ray "pattern painter." Here the magnetic deflection
coils actually rotate about the neck of the cathode-ray tube in synchronism
with the model. Thus, as the signal intensity changes the electron beam
can follow the speediest variation with no time lag, no error. When
used for radiation pattern plotting the screen (long persistence) of
the tube is photographed on 35 mm. film for a permanent record (Fig.
3), Another fine feature of the particular model developed at the Douglas
laboratory is an edge-lighted Lucite disc seen in the illustration mounted
below the cathode-ray tube. This disc is called the "full moon" because
of its characteristic of glowing with evenly distributed white light.
All pertinent data such as frequency, aircraft type, and description
of the "cut," is typed on transparent gummed paper and this is then
fixed over the face of the "full moon." Easily photographed on the same
film as the pattern, such a screen label feature permits the laboratory
to obtain a very complete, foolproof record of work in progress.
must have transmitters available to cover enormous ranges of frequencies.
To see the reason why, let us assume that the full scale frequencies
of three antennas to be tested span the region 80 to 1600 megacycles.
Not only must oscillators be on hand for these exact frequencies but,
in addition, if the model range measurements are to be made at 1/20th
scale, r.f. generators are required for the simulated range 1600 to
32,000 megacycles. Spanning such an expanse of radio territory calls
for an imposing collection of coaxial cavity, and "butterfly" type oscillators,
many, many Klystron tuners as well as elaborate high-voltage regulated
power supplies and frequency measuring equipment of great accuracy.
It is no wonder that antenna engineers always ask for bar-gains in frequency
coverage when shopping for transmitters; otherwise such equipment would
overflow the laboratory.
To cover the multitude of problems
which trouble an antenna specialist's slumber would be beyond the scope
of this article. Some of the especially serious ones, however, may be
of interest. The first and worst of these is spurious reflected signals.
Exactly the same problem is faced by television service technicians
in the form of "ghosts." The aircraft model itself is, of course, placed
carefully "in the clear." Any posts, buildings, fences, or personnel
in its vicinity would reflect signals into the model as if they were
secondary transmitters. Such reflections, depending upon their instantaneous
phase, either add or subtract in certain directions from the true magnitude
pattern of the model.
The real villain of this story, however, is the ground or platform upon
which the antenna laboratory rests. "Splash" from this source is almost
impossible to eliminate completely. Great care is exercised in designing
the large sectorial horn antennas which "illuminate" the models so that
just enough beam width with uniform phase front is produced to cover
the model with r.f. energy. Even though this precaution lowers the magnitude
of floor "splash" it does not completely remove it. Sometimes low metal
fences properly called detraction edges are placed on the model range
to deflect the "splash" signal into a harmless area. Placing these fences
for each frequency used (and sometimes as many as 200 "cuts" are made
on a single model) is more of an art than a science.
Fig. 8. Close-up of 1 cm. transmitter and horn antenna. A complete
30,000 mc. Klystron transmitter, cavity wavemeter, and high
gain horn radiator makes only a light handful of microwave equipment.
Fig. 9. Slot antenna and cable. The size of a pair of 1/20th
scale slot antennas and miniature coaxial cable may be judged
by comparison with hand holding them.
Fig. 10. View of computer showing vacuum tube bays. Mathematician
inspects plug board which inserts problem into the 1285 vacuum
tube electronic computer used to solve complex antenna equations.
Such machines are now routine tools in the search for new antenna
designs and antenna improvements.
Fig. 11. View of "feed" end of large horn type antenna. Coaxial
cable shown supplies v.h.f. energy to probe "feed" for the large
horn type "illuminating" antenna. Microwatts are precious, and
technician carefully adjusts the matching stub for the maximum
troublemaker is the small coaxial cable which conveys the detected signal
from the model down the tower to the laboratory. This is, of course,
a metallic conductor of many wavelengths projecting from the model.
Pattern distortion will be introduced by this cable, and only highly
experienced personnel can minimize this difficulty by judicious placement
of the cable when setting the model up for a "cut." To overcome this
hazard some researchers have actually placed midget transmitters inside
the model aircraft. Battery power or an air-driven generator energized
by a high pressure hose are used, but the attendant cooling problems
and frequency drift due to lack of power supply regulation makes this
technique a last resort measure.
The problem of distance in
wavelengths at the operating frequency between the model under test
and the "illuminating" horn antenna poses, at times, a nightmarish enigma
for the antenna worker. In order that an accurate radiation pattern
be secured, the model aircraft must sometimes be placed as many as 100
wavelengths from the laboratory antenna, otherwise true "free space"
conditions are not realized. Even at the microwave frequencies 100 wavelengths
may be a sizable distance physically. Unfortunately, the power output
of laboratory type Klystron tubes is only about 200 milliwatts for the
region up to about 8000 mc. and 40 to 50 mw. for frequencies above this.
Sensitivity of the simple receivers used in the models is quite low
and, upon numerous occasions, the model simply cannot be placed at the
required distance and still secure sufficient signal to record a pattern.
The model tower must then be moved into the so-called "near zone" region
and many hours spent in calculations and educated guesses in order to
replot the pattern to some degree of accuracy. The uninitiated invariably
suggest going to higher powered transmitters such as radar pulsed units.
When such suggestor, however, ponders over the problem of building or
purchasing the number of high power, room-size radars needed to cover
the frequencies called for, he soon realizes that a fairly large warehouse
would be needed to mount them for use.
Rejoining the antenna
engineer it is found that his new antenna has successfully completed
its preliminary radiation pattern tests. While mildly jubilant he must
still subject his creation to an investigation to determine its response
to cross-polarized signals. Also he must investigate what effect additional
structures, such as wing mounted rockets or bombs, have on its pattern.
The worried frown will remain on his brow for some time to come as he
follows the antenna through the intricate maze of production decisions,
cost analysis, and lastly the flight test which places the final stamp
of approval on his work.
While emphasis has been placed on the
aircraft antenna because of its present importance, it should be made
clear that the laboratories of such institutions as Ohio State University
are carrying on programs of investigation into many other aspects of
the antenna problem. For example, in the study of land-based radio stations
scientists must content themselves not only with dimensional perfection
with regard to towers and buildings, but must also actually design the
soil of these scale models to have proper conductivity at the higher
model frequencies in order that it simulate the soil found in the region
under study. The "guess and by-gosh" methods of the past in making costly
antenna installations are slowly giving way to exact knowledge.
Last but by no means least, Naval research centers are engaged in
measuring the radiation patterns of antennas mounted within the complex
maze produced by a ship's masts, cables, and other marine structure.
As might be expected, Naval antenna designers must take the sea into
account when making their scaled-down ships for range tests. To an electromagnetic
wave a ship resting upon the sea appears to have an exact mirror image
directly beneath it. This can be duplicated on "the Naval antenna model
range by cutting a ship model off at its water line and resting it upon
a large sheet of metal. In lieu of this, two ship models are constructed,
sawed off at the water line, and one fastened upside down to the waterline
of the other. The technique of making the actual radiation pattern measurements
is identical to that described for aircraft.
1 Military frequencies are classified. Those given
are only representative.