1996 - 2016
BSEE - KB3UON
RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.
My Hobby Website:
April 1958 Radio-Electronics[Table of Contents]
These articles are scanned and OCRed from old editions of the Radio & Television News magazine. Here is a list of the Radio-Electronics articles I have already posted. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.
"Ground is ground the world around," is an oft repeated saying when talking about making electrical connections to Earth ground. In a general sense that is true, especially when referring to electromagnetic radio signals and antenna systems that are in some manner dependent on the common connection. However, when you are working within the confines of a localized electronic circuit such as on a printed circuit board or inside a chassis, there is no guarantee that without proper precautions ground is not at the same potential everywhere. Poor (high impedance) soldered, crimped, and bolted connections are among the prime offenders that cause voltage differentials to arise between points intended to be equipotential. RF frequency signals are particularly sensitive to even a minor divergence from the designed impedance because standing waves and reflected signals can and will generate signal distortions. This brief article runs through some of the more common causes of grounding problems. Anyone working with older electronic equipment might find it especially useful.
Grounding isn't always easy. Even an inch of wire can cause trouble
By A. R. Clawson
Technical workers, experimenters, hobbyists and even some engineers consider an electronic chassis a common ground. This common-ground idea often proves false. Case histories, including causes and solutions, of a few uncommon ground troubles are presented here.
Fig. 1 - Hum modulation, due to an inch of wire.
Fig. 2 - Equivalent circuit showing filter capacitor return to lug and then along common impedance of converter stage.
Fig. 3 - Common and nearby grounding of horizontal oscillator bypass and IF bypass capacitors results in jitter.
Fig. 4 - Mutual interaction of ground currents from nearby ground points.
Fig. 5 - Capacitive coupling between a hot chassis and a hot conductor; a - actual circuit; b - equivalent circuit.
Fig. 7 - Poorly soldered lug introduces a high common impedance between the common joint of two capacitors returning to ground.
Fig. 8 - The joint in Figure 7 after resoldering.
Even the smallest part of a metal chassis presents some opposition to the flow of current. This is its impedance and for DC is equal to the ohmic resistance. There is no need to get involved in the calculation of impedance, but we must look into some of its effects.
To AC the impedance is a combination of AC resistance and net reactance - primarily inductive reactance. AC resistance is not the same as DC resistance, but always greater. The skin and other effects add to the DC resistance. This may increase the resistance factor by as much as 12 times at television frequencies.
The other component of impedance, the reactance, may reach rather high values with increasing frequency for inductive circuits. A 1-inch piece of ordinary hookup wire can have 4 ohms of inductive reactance at 30 mc! Yet its ohmic (ohmmeter) resistance is too small to measure with an ordinary meter.
An example of this type of trouble turned up in an ordinary broadcast receiver. The set had a bad case of hum modulation, indicated by no hum when the set was tuned off station.
Troubleshooting was rapid since the hum increased as the higher-frequency stations were tuned. The variation ruled out the if stages, leaving only the converter. The trouble was found to be an incorrectly grounded lead from an electrolytic capacitor.
Fig. 1 shows a wire running from a ground lance (punched-up lug) to a socket lug of the converter stage. Note the cathode resistor of the tube and the ground return of the electrolytic capacitor returning to the socket lug. Both cathode current and capacitor current flows through the wire from socket lug to lance.
Capacitor current has two components of interest: reactance flow equals the ripple voltage divided by the capacitor's reactance; AC leakage current, equal to ripple voltage divided by the electrolytics leakage resistance. There is also a DC component of no concern here.
The wire offers some impedance at 120 cycles - we need not worry about calculating it. But we do have to note that there is a voltage drop:
E = I x Z (or E = IZ)
where I is the combined alternating current and Z the small but definitely present impedance at 120 cycles.
Fig. 2 shows the circuit. The wire and, to a lesser extent, the lance form the common impedance, with some small contribution from the socket lug, making Zcommon. Its equivalent circuit is shown as an insert. The leakage resistance and capacitive reactance are shown as resistances. The voltage developed, Ecommon is applied to the cathode of the tube in series with a cathode resistor. The ripple voltage modulated the cathode of the converter in this instance.
The value of Zcommon increased with increasing frequency, permitting more of the developed hum voltage to be effective. This follows from the formula:
XL = 2πfL
Inductance L remained constant while frequency f increased 3 times from 500 to 1,500 kc, with a similar increases in X1 - the reactance-and the impedance of Zcommon at these frequencies.
Moving the ground-return wire of the electrolytic to the lance, where it had been prior to electrolytic replacement in another shop, cured the hum. Just an inch of common ground wire caused all the trouble!
False Sync Pulses
Feedback of sweep or sync into the video or pix if or front end can result in an unwanted and false sync pulse. Sweep oscillators, even though afc-protected, may try to lock on the added pulse with resultant symptoms of jump, jitter, and sometimes even vertical roll.
Typical of this class (see Fig. 3) is the case of horizontal oscillator feedback, or injection. A tubular ceramic (C1), a horizontal oscillator bypass carrying sweep currents to ground and disc capacitor (C2) were grounded to the same ground lance (lug). The lug acted as the common impedance. Feedback of horizontal oscillator pulses into the picture if resulted in jitter whenever the horizontal frequency drifted ever so slightly. The design error was corrected in later production runs.
Fig. 6 - a) In-line layout minimizes chassis current interaction; b) bent layout, with possible regenerative or degenerative feedback.
Not all feedback was due to the common impedance of C1 and C2's common ground lance. Some feedback was caused by the current of C1 intermingling with the chassis current of C3, a disc if bypass capacitor. The common impedance was the sheet-metal chassis proper! The solution was to move C3's ground to the same point as C1.
Fig. 4 shows what happens. Tube V1 has a bypass C1 and tube V2 has as its bypass C2. The tubes may have different functions like the sweep oscillator and if just mentioned. The bypass capacitors normally return their current through the chassis to the cathode of the tube. Heaviest current flow is between the ground point of the capacitor and the cathode or its bypass capacitor. Not all the current goes in a straight line however, but forms a sweeping motion in accordance with the low but existing chassis impedance. The lines in Fig. 4 enclose approximately equal areas of current flow and equal chassis impedance.
Note that the lines of flow (flux) of capacitor C1 intermingle with those of C2. The result is a voltage, similar to that developed in the hum modulation case. This time it is in the chassis instead of a wire. The voltage is small and can be disregarded in many instances. Sometimes, this voltage may inject another voltage, a false sync pulse, for example. Degenerative or regenerative feedback may also occur.
Worthy of note is the control of chassis currents and common impedances by chassis openings. If a row of slots or holes is punched between the sockets of V1 and V2 (Fig. 4), the common impedance is interrupted to a large extent. Where rerouting the capacitor is not feasible, this might be a satisfactory solution.
Cases occur of capacitive reactance between a wire or other conductor and a hot chassis. The chassis may be carrying a large current at a high frequency and, if a conductor is too close, a very low feedback path may exist due to the capacitance formed. The reactance will be low at high frequencies according to the capacitive reactance formula:
Fig. 5 is a sketch of such a wire close to a chassis. Feedback of deflection yoke currents into tuner (front-end) shields has occurred by this method. The remedy is redressing the yoke leads. Commercial equipment does not lend itself to layout changes but such information is helpful to those that make their own. Careful layout can avoid trouble.
As an example, Fig. 6-a shows a straight-line amplifier - the tube sockets in line. Given the same components, the in-line amplifier can yield greater gain than the bent amplifier of Fig. 6-b. The reason is that the bending crowds the current flux (flow) into the corner, and input and output currents of the tube at the bend mix in the common chassis impedance. The result may be instability.
Tube sockets are mounted in holes in the chassis. A ground point may be selected on the opposite side of the tube. For example, in Fig. 4, the common impedance between C1 and C2 can be greatly lessened by using new ground points at X. The socket holes interfere with current flow toward the other tube for each capacitor. This is more effective than the slot method.
Another way to keep ground currents in line is to increase the conductivity of the chassis or ground in the desired direction, thereby diverting current from undesired paths. A strip of braid may do the job very nicely. In Fig. 1. paralleling the inch of wire with braid would probably reduce the common impedance to where the hum modulation would not be objectionable. However, moving the capacitor lead was the easy way.
A sheet of metal, riveted, soldered, or bolted to the chassis, can serve to divert currents by lowering the impedance.
Fig. 7 shows the circuit formed by a poorly soldered connection between a ground lug and two capacitors making; a return at that point. Fig. 8 shows the actual parts after resoldering.
The impedance Zcommon should have been nearly zero ohms in this case, but actually was about 0.5 megohm. The large electrolytic and an agc filter capacitor in Fig. 8 were grounded at the lance. Due to the common impedance, the power supply ripple fed into the age line practically without hindrance-the only opposition was the reactances of the capacitors themselves.
Common practice uses the chassis as one return leg for the heaters of all tubes. These can intermingle with signal currents to produce unwanted effects. Heaters should be connected directly to their own ground rather than to another socket lug because the common impedance may become a trouble spot that will be difficult to localize. Assume the wire in Fig. 1 is the common return of a heater and a cathode - the effect might resemble cathode-to-heater leakage and no amount of tube substitution will remedy such a situation.
Posted May 25, 2014