1996 - 2016
BSEE - KB3UON
RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.
My Hobby Website:
July 1958 Radio-Electronics[Table of Contents]
These articles are scanned and OCRed from old editions of the Radio & Television News magazine. Here is a list of the Radio-Electronics articles I have already posted. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.
My first major high fidelity stereo system purchase came during my senior year of high school (1976 - ugh!) when I had saved enough money to buy a combination AM/FM receiver, 8-track tape deck, turn table, and two speakers with separate woofers, midranges, and tweeters. At the time I thought the setup might impress friends and relatives... until I learned quite quickly that 'serious' stereo sound connoisseurs decidedly did NOT have equipment with "Reader's Digest" logos on it. Oh well, the price
This proves you can find just about anything on eBay. After writing this article, I did a quick search for that Reader's Digest stereo system and found the receiver and 8-track tape unit. Speakers and turntable were not available.
The facts on the 45/45 system
By Norman H. Crowhurst
Fig. 1-The basis behind the wrong idea that each channel is cut into one wall of the groove in the 45/45 system: a - no modulation; b - modulation in channel 1 appears to cut only the right wall; c - modulation in channel 2 appears to cut only the left wall.
Fig. 2-A more careful analysis of how the cutter, groove and playback stylus move for different intensity and phase relations between channels at anyone frequency: a - in phase; b - out of phase; c - intensity difference; d - 90° phase difference; e - 30° phase difference; f - intensity and phase (30°) difference.
A recent conversation about the stereo discs ran something like this: "How on earth can a pickup stylus vibrate two ways at the same time and give different inputs for two preamplifiers?"
"That's easy," the answer came.
"Every groove has two walls and one recording is cut into each wall of the groove."
The puzzled expression on the questioner's face showed that this did not satisfy him - and for good reason. It is impossible for the stylus to follow different contours on both walls of the groove at the same time. This may have been a simple explanation but it was certainly not the correct one.
In literature issued by Westrex the difference between cutting the two channels appears somewhat as in Fig. 1. It shows a record cutter that has an angle between the cutting faces of precisely 90°. The two drive mechanisms, arranged at 45° to the vertical so the total angle between is 90°, drive this cutter in directions parallel to its faces.
Consequently the diagram may make it seem that the vibrations due to one drive are recorded in one wall of the groove while vibrations due to the other drive are recorded in the other wall.
Stylus and cutter motion
In practice, there is invariably some program in both channels and both vibrations occur at once. So it is more important to consider what happens to the point of the cutter than to the contour produced by its two angular cutting edges. This is because the pick-up stylus will (or should) ride in the bottom of the groove, cut by the point of the cutter, and it is the movement of this point in the groove that determines the program content of the two channels. To clarify this, let us consider what happens with different program combinations.
If both channels carry the same program at the same intensity and in phase, the movement of the cutter and the pickup stylus will be in the form of a lateral vibration (Fig. 2-a). ("In phase" as explained further down, refers to the system phase, not that of the cutter drive mechanisms.)
But if the inputs are precisely out of phase, the corresponding output from the loudspeakers on playback should also be out of phase, with one loudspeaker pushing when the other pulls. Then the motion of the cutter, groove and pickup stylus will be up and down in a vertical direction (as shown in Fig. 2-b).
If both channels have the same frequency in phase, but the intensity of one channel is stronger than the other, the motion will be predominantly lateral, with a slight angle but less than 45° (as shown in Fig. 2-e).
If both channels carry the same frequency, but the phase relationship is neither in nor out of phase, other movements can occur. At a phase relationship of precisely 90", the motion of the cutter and the stylus, will be in a circle (Fig. 2-d). Other phase relations with equal intensity will produce an elliptical movement, as shown in Fig, 2-e.
Finally, if there is a difference in both intensity and phase that does not correspond with either an in-phase or out-of-phase condition, the motion of the cutter and ultimately that of the stylus will be in a modified ellipse as shown in Fig. 2-f.
The ESL stereo pickup separates the movement right at the stylus. This is the prototype model.
The Electro-Voice pickup uses two crystal elements
The Electro-Voice cartridge, right, is shown in the insert on the cover with the lower part of the housing (shown as white in this photo) removed and the copper clip normally attached to it floating in air. The two ceramic elements are clearly seen at the base of the red coupling element, running between it and the grayish mounting block at their opposite ends.
The motions depicted by Fig. 2, of course, represent only what can happen at one frequency at a time. As practical program material contains a variety of frequencies, at various intensities and phase relationships, the cutter, and hence ultimately the stylus, perform an endless variety of patterns, weaving in and out and up and down.
This explains the nature of the groove and what it represents. Now we come to the question of how this information is extracted from the groove by the pickup. But before we proceed, let's clear up the question of phase, because different writings and discussions on the subject use different terms of reference and apparent contradictions arise.
Some refer the phase relationship, between the motion in different directions, to the cutter or pickup mechanism while others refer it to the overall action of the system. The definitions we have used so far, both in the previous article ("Single-Groove Stereo Discs," Radio Electronics, January, 1958) and in this one, are related to system phase. This is based on the desirability of the lateral direction of cutter and stylus motion corresponding with the in-phase combination of program in the two channels.
But, related to the simple cutter design shown in Fig. 3, an in-phase movement of the two cutter mechanisms will drive the cutter vertically because the outward thrust of both elements results in a downward movement while the inward pull results in an upward movement.
To reverse the phase relationship to come out with the in-phase input to the two microphones producing a lateral cut, all that is necessary is to reverse the connections to one of the cutter coils. Similarly, if we take careful account of the phasing at the pickup, we can reverse one of the connections between the pickup and the amplifier or at the speaker, so lateral motion of the stylus results in in-phase motion of the loudspeaker diaphragms.
So, if we talk about cutter or pickup phasing, in-phase action produces a vertical cut and out-of-phase a lateral one. But referred to the system - the microphone input or loudspeaker output, it is just the other way around. To avoid confusion, references to phase in this article are related to the system rather than to the cutter or pickup mechanism.
Now to the pickup
Basically a pickup for stereophonic discs can use the same kinds of transducer elements, for converting the mechanical motion of the stylus into electrical output, as nonstereo pickups. The more common forms are magnetic, moving coil, crystal and ceramic. The way these elements operate follows precisely the same principle as their single-channel forebears. Now we come to the real question, how do we separate the two forms of vibration?
There are two extremes in the way this can be done. One method separates the two movements at the stylus point and couples them by separate mechanisms to individual transducer elements. This is the method used in reverse in the Westrex cutter head. The stylus is carried on a fairly stiff rod, in line with the direction of the groove. The two cutter motors are directly coupled to the stylus point at 45° in two directions, as shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3 - Basic action of Westrex cutter couples movement in two directions right at the stylus.
The same method of coupling, applied to a moving-coil pickup, is exemplified in the ESL stereophonic pickup, shown in the photos. It uses two d'Arsonval type moving-coil mechanisms, similar to their well-known single-channel design, both coupled to the same stylus. The stylus is the common point at which the drive separates the two moving-coil transducers.
At the other extreme the stylus motion can be conveyed by a common arm to a pivot or some kind of combination transducer where the two outputs are obtained electrically by separation in the transducer action itself. An example that excellently illustrates this method is the Fairchild stereophonic pickup.
The photos are a magnified view of the central element of the professional model of this pickup. As shown, the bobbins are empty and the actual coils have not been wound. The transparent plastic bobbins can clearly be seen at 45° to the square frame. The thin wires passing through the centers of the side suspend the coil assembly and provide a restoring force to center the coil in its neutral position.
The stylus arm, shown coming down at approximately a 45° angle, can move in almost any direction and produce a corresponding combination movement in the coil. The magnetic field that produces the electrical output when the coils move is produced by pole pieces in front and behind the square. The magnetic poles are not shown in the photo because they would obscure the mechanism.
Obviously, if the stylus moves at a 45° angle one way, one coil will be rotating about its own axis and otherwise not moving and will produce no output while the other coil will be rotating like a d'Arsonval coil between the two pole pieces and produce an electrical output (Fig. 4-a ). Motion in the opposite 45° direction will make the first coil produce an output, while the second one rotates about its own axis and does not produce any output (Fig. 4-b).
This construction produces better than 20-db separation between the two motions, over a frequency range extending from the low end up to the region about 10,000 cycles. Above this, separation is not so good, although the response of the pickup is maintained.
These may be regarded as two extremes in method. Practical pickups may well bridge the gap and produce results by methods that would be difficult to list under either one of these extreme headings, perhaps coming close to achieving it by both of them.
Fig. 4 (a, above, and b, below) - The Fairchild cartridge, a moving-coil type, uses the same stylus arm to transmit the combined vibrations to a double-coil assembly mounted in the same magnetic field.
The new Electro-Voice design is one such method. This pickup is shown in the photos and its basic operation illustrated by Fig. 5. Like the Westrex cutter, the stylus is supported by a horizontal rod in line with the direction of the groove. However, a much more flexible rod is used because a stereo pickup requires a high compliance, or flexibility, while the cutter requires quite a reasonable stiffness.
Underneath the clip toward the right of the photograph is a removable mounting for the stylus and rod, so it can readily be changed without replacing the pickup. The stylus arm drives the crystals through a triangular piece of compliant or elastic material. Motion at one 45° angle drives one crystal, while not moving the other one and vice versa.
As a crystal is basically a stiffness or compliant device (the drive force is used to bend it rather than move it) and these elements in this cartridge are rigidly mounted at their other end, the compliant drive from the stylus arm to the crystal represents a mechanical potentiometer, both elements of which are a compliance or stiffness. This means that if the compliance of the coupling element is five times that of the crystal then the motion at the tip of the crystal will only be one-fifth of the stylus' motion in that particular direction.
As crystals produce a high output from a microgroove recording, this method still delivers enough output for any high-fidelity preamplifier and it has the advantage, over the more usual method of coupling through a mechanical lever system, that mechanical lever resonances are completely avoided. The dominant mechanical impedance presented to the stylus point is the compliance of the stylus arm itself and its elastic coupling member.
If there is any mechanical resonance in the crystal element within the audio range, it will modify the frequency response but will not produce the damaging effect upon the record usually associated with crystals. Also the use of this "potentiometer" arrangement restricts the magnitude of movement required in the crystal and lets it operate in a range where it is essentially linear. Driving the crystal harder (as the normal lever system does) would run it into nonlinear extremes.
With this pickup, separation of channels really takes place in the triangular piece of compliant material. But as this is one piece of material and not two separate links, it seems to "split the difference" between the extremes we started out with. An advantage of this design is the relative purity of the separating method, achieving a high order of discrimination against cross-modulation.
Other variations in the method of splitting the output can be seen by looking at possible ways of doing it in a magnetic construction (see Fig. 6). Here, the slug of magnetic material that produces the variation in magnetic reluctance is attached directly to the stylus arm and varies the reluctance of both magnetic circuits, one for each channel. Motion at one 45° angle will change the gaps in that direction but not in the other direction, and there will be an output from only one coil. Motion in the other 45° angle will produce an output from the other coil. The complicated motion of the stylus following a stereophonic groove produces an output from both coils in the desired stereophonic relationship.
What's the delay?
From this discussion it is evident that there are a variety of ways to make pickup for stereo discs. Also it is evident that there are no serious problems in cutting the discs. A feedback cutter, such as the Westrex, will do a good job of separating the two channels and avoiding cross-talk, provided the two drives are mounted precisely a 90° to each other. So what are we waiting for? Why have not standards been laid down and records already in production, with pickups to play them?
Fig. 5 - The Electro-Voice stereophonic pickup uses crystals and transfers the vibrations through an elastic piece that separates them.
Fig. 6 - Another possibility is shown in this diagram of a composite two-coil magnetic assembly.
Fig. 7 - How an unduly steep stylus-arm angle might cause the vertical component of stylus motion to frequency-modulate the recorded program.
Here we have a "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" type of problem. The pickup manufacturers are looking for test records to determine how good their pickups are, while the record manufacturers need some way to measure precisely what they have cut on a recording. The pickup manufacturers are looking for a perfect or at least adequate test disc or series of test discs, while the recording manufacturers are looking for a perfect pickup or one adequately within range, to determine precisely what they have on their recording.
Then there has been the decision about the appropriate groove contour - should the angle be exactly 90° as suggested by Westrex, or would other angles, such as the system proposed by CBS, also be suitable. Also the correct contour for both cutter and stylus has not been selected. Will the contour now standard in the industry for monogroove be used or some other contour? Then we need some way to test for interchannel intermodulation, cross-modulation and other effects that were completely unknown with mono-grooves, The official approval of the Westrex system (which is interpreted to include the CBS technique) may hasten action in standardizing these other points.
Perhaps we should point out here that there is a difference at the cutter end between the drive being at precisely 90°, or two separate 45° angles, and the angle of the cutter wedge being the same. If the stylus really runs along the bottom of the groove, it is not important to have the angle of the groove a precise 45° or 90°. Any angle, so long as it is suitably standardized, will serve the purpose. The important thing is that the stylus must be able to ride the bottom of the groove correctly.
In the design and testing of pickups there are some problems to settle. For example, the Fairchild professional pickup has a stylus-arm angle of about 45° sloping forward (quite apart from the 45° angles of the coils themselves). If the stylus only moves laterally, its motion will be similar to that of any lateral recording. But if the stylus follows a vertical component, even though this may be a partial component due to both the 45° elements, the up-and-down movement of the stylus will also produce a component (approximately equal to it) back and forth along the direction of the groove (see Fig. 7).
This will amount to a Doppler effect along the groove or will result in effective frequency modulation by the vertical component, As the vertical component is not confined to one of the program channels in 45/45, the combined vertical or out-of-phase component of both channels will produce frequency modulation.
We could go on to theorize about this but the real question is, does it really produce distortion? And if it does, is its effect audible as a deterioration of program quality? This is one of many things that still have to be proved. However, it is interesting to note that a new Fairchild pickup has a stylus arm that comes much nearer to being horizontal.
Another thing, this discussion is based on the motion of the stylus remaining simple at all times - we assume it pivots about the cross-bar junction in the center of the coil. But if the vibrations runs into resonant conditions of the cross-wires or stylus arm at any frequency instead of the stylus assembly vibrating as a whole, the investigation becomes even more complex and it is possible that some form of intermodulation or other distortion not yet considered may take place.
Each kind of pickup, and each design approach, will have its own problems. In general, the simplest mechanism is most likely to avoid troubles. But the only real way to determine the effect of these different possible forms of distortion is to measure them - to get test discs with different frequencies recorded on the respective channels, determine possible cross-modulation from one channel to the other, or intermodulation of the audio on one particular channel by other tones on either channel, etc., using discs yet to be made.
Finally, having discovered what degree of intermodulation or cross-modulation exists with any particular pickup or record combination, we still have to determine whether this is important in terms of the end result - listening to the stereophonic program. It must be conceded that all of the pickups recently demonstrated have produced quite listenable stereophonic presentation, even though a rigid theoretical investigation might suggest that some terrible distortion occurs.
From the work done so far and the technological improvement achieved to date, it is evident that stereo discs have a great future. There will be a little shakedown period - getting the bugs out and determining what kinds of distortion really matter or whether they are really present at all - and then it seems we shall have a golden opportunity for getting stereophonic program at a cost no greater than regular LP's.
Posted August 3, 2014