RF Cascade Workbook

Copyright

1996 -
2016

Webmaster:

Kirt
Blattenberger,

BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

AirplanesAndRockets.com

to Find What You Need.

There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

September 1966 QST Article

## September 1966 QSTThese articles are scanned and OCRed from old editions of the ARRL's QST magazine. Here is a list of the QST articles I have already posted. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged. |

Calculation for Matching Antenna System to Transmitter

An article by W8CGD in an earlier issue of QST

The Handbook formulas for the design of L networks are limited to cases of transforming pure resistances. Unfortunately, a feed-point impedance which contains no reactive component is about as rare as a dodo. Accordingly, I derived formulas for transforming any load impedance to a pure resistance of any desired value.

The L network has two possible configurations. When the resistive component of the load is greater than the desired generator resistance (R

The formulas for the two networks of Fig. 1 are different, so we will look at them one at a time, and work out an example for each. In all of these formulas, the subscript I refers to the input resistance of the network, O to the output impedance of the network, and S and P to the series and parallel network reactances, respectively. Hence, if we are trying to match a transmitter to an antenna, R

We will start with the case where the resistive part of our load (R

Here is how we proceed to design the required L network:

R

R

jX

1)

2) jX

= j6.5 + j(17)(1.393)

= j30.2

3) The plus sign tells us that the required reactance is inductive.

The inductance required to yield a reactance of 30.2 ohms at 3950 kc. is then:

4)

5) The minus sign tells us that this reactance is capacitive. The capacitance required to provide a reactance of 35.9 ohms at 3950 kc. is:

The circuit is then as shown in Fig. 3A.

Now, on to the junk box. It produced a 1000-and a 200-pf. mica capacitor, and a piece of 5/8-inch 16-pitch coil stock. The Handbook graph says 10 1/2 turns of this will come pretty close to 1.23 µh., and the capacitance is pretty close to what we need. Adding one coffee can, coax and connectors, and a couple of hours in the cellar, produced the object shown in the sketch of Fig. 4 and the photo. With this network patched into the antenna lead, the previously-reluctant transmitter now loads without difficulty from 3900 to 4000 kc,

Before leaving this topic, it should be mentioned that there is also another pair of reactance values which would do the same job if the inductive and capacitive elements are transposed. The values required may be computed in the same manner as given in the example, but using these formulas:

jX

jX

where A has the same meaning indicated earlier.

Using the data of the foregoing example, these formulas yield results as follows:

jX

jX

The circuit is as shown in Fig. 3B.

A network using these values would have performed equally well, but the required components are larger, and the internal d.c. ground on the coax center conductor found in most transmitters would be blocked from the antenna by the series capacitor. It may be worthwhile to figure the values both ways, and choose the arrangement you like best.

The other network configuration (Fig. 1A) must be used when the resistive part of our load (R

R

R

jX

ƒ = 14.1 megacycles

1) Z

= 4900 + 400 = 5300

2)

3)

4)

(It will be noticed that j was shifted from the denominator to the numerator with a change of sign. This is accomplished by multiplying both numerator and denominator by - j.)

5)

As in our previous case, there is another pair of values which will also do the same job, obtainable by the following formulas:

Again using our same data, these formulas yield results as follows:

jX

jX

C

L

A network using these values would do the same impedance-matching job as the preceding one.

As a concluding comment applicable to both network configurations, I would point out that in some cases both the series and parallel elements will be of the same kind (L or C), so if you come out with this result it doesn't necessarily signal an error in arithmetic.

The photograph shows the coffee-can job described earlier, together with a prototype 20-meter job which, not being canned, is more photogenic. It has since been canned to reduce undesired local radiation. This one, you will notice, required two inductors. The companion set of formulas yielded an LC combination, but Miniductor is a lot easier to trim to size than a molded mica brick.

These networks have been wholly successful in enabling me to feed my NCX-5 transceiver into a trap dipole, with plenty of room to spare on the transmitter adjustment, where previously it had been impossible to achieve the manufacturer's recommended conditions of loading.

I should like to acknowledge the many helpful suggestions of Doyle Strandlund, W8CGD, during the preparation of this article.

Now with a few hours of effort, you can really transform the needles, noodles, and wet string to 50 + j0. Who will be the first to build an d. noodle drier?

1 Strandlund, "Amateur Measurement, of R + jX," QST, June, 1965.

Posted 6/3/2013