November 1960 Electronics World
of Contents] People old and young enjoy waxing nostalgic about
and learning some of the history of early electronics. Electronics World
was published from May 1959 through December 1971. As time permits, I will
be glad to scan articles for you. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.
Electronics World articles.
When really good researchers set out to write books on history, they do not simply cull information
from the publications of fellow contemporary authors; instead, they look for sources that were
published during or around the time of the subject being covered. Doing so helps minimize the
possibility that inaccuracies have crept into the knowledge pool and that information other authors
might have either deemed insignificant or have missed can be recovered. With a bit of luck, sources
are discovered that have never been used before. That is part of my motivation for going to the
trouble of buying these vintage magazines and posting articles like this one which reports on
early maser developments. It delves fairly deeply into the solid state physics of rare earth minerals
that some of the first masers and lasers relied upon to function, including energy band diagrams
If the "sugar scoop" antenna looks familiar, it might be due to its rising to fame as the result
of Dr.s Arno
Robert Wilson having serendipitously discovered the background cosmic radiation of the universe's
creation while using it after Project Echo shut down. The discovery led to a
Nobel Prize in Physics in 1978.
See all the available
articles. Also see
Maser: The Jewel That Conquers Space and the
Project Echo advertisement
in April 1960 Popular Electronics.
The Maser: Receiver for Signals from Space
Martin I. Grace & Joseph G. Smith
Airborne Instruments Laboratory, Div. of Cutler-Hammer Inc.
Radar pulses bounced back from distant planets, communications with space vehicles, receivers
to listen for radio signals from outer space, satellite-reflected telephone and TV microwave signals
- these are all possible because of the remarkable maser, which uses atomic forces within a super-cooled
ruby to amplify.
Some two-hundred times better than a good, conventional radar receiver, the maser receiver
affords scientists in the fields of space communications, radar, and radio astronomy the possibility
of amazing improvements. This is because the maser receiver is an almost theoretically perfect
receiver insofar as sensitivity and low noise are concerned. Radar range can be increased, or
for the same range, the transmitter power can be cut by a factor of 10. Satellite and deep space
communication will be extended. Coast-to-coast and continent-to-continent microwave communication
links without repeater stations (i.e., via satellite reflector) should be realized. Radio astronomers
will be able to "see" much deeper into space, helping to answer some of the basic questions about
the universe, and perhaps, discover another civilization. This is not as preposterous as it sounds.
Project "Ozma" has been initiated to listen continuously for intelligent transmissions of radio
signals from outer space. The project will use a maser for the ultimate in listening range.
An excellent example demonstrating the ability of a maser to amplify very weak signals was the
Venus radar bounce disclosed last year. In this experiment conducted at the Millstone Radar Site
of the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a radar signal was beamed at the planet Venus. A small portion
was reflected back toward earth where it was detected by a maser receiver. The scientists involved
in the bounce admit the project would have been unsuccessful without the maser. Calculations showed
that the transmitter power necessary for the bounce, using a conventional receiver, would have
been so high that the air directly in front of the antenna would have been ionized.
Fig. 1. Electron-spin energy at various values of magnetic field strength.
Dr. R. H. Kingston prepares the maser for the Venus observations at M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory's
Millstone Hill Radar Observatory.
Fig. 2. Energy-level diagram for ruby showing magnetic field and pump frequency needed to
operate at 1800 mc.
Fig. 3. Energy-level spin population.
Lincoln Laboratory's Radar Observatory at Westford, Massachusetts. Venus was "seen" with the
maser-equipped dish at the right. Frequency used was about 300-500 mc.; pulse power was 265
kw.; dish size was 84 feet. Maser is at feed point of dish antenna.
Fig. 4. Tunable maser cavity structure used in Airborne Instruments Laboratories gear.
Fig. 5. System diagram of maser operation.
Close-up of Harvard maser mounted at antenna feed. Protective covers have been removed to
show electromagnet at bottom and dewar structure that is utilized. The receiving waveguide
horn is located at left.
Harvard University's 60-foot parabolic dish with maser installed at feed point.
H. E. D. Scovil of Bell Laboratories points out to R. W. DeGrasse an input coax of the two-channel
traveling-wave maser designed for satellite communication. This maser is being used with a
Fig. 6. Comb-type slow-wave structure designed for traveling-wave maser of type employed in
Bell Telephone Laboratories and Airborne Instruments Labs. equipment.
Prof. C. H. Townes of Columbia University coined the word "maser" by taking the first letters
of its more technical description, "microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation."
Prof. Townes proposed a maser in 1953 and experimentally verified it three years later with a
maser which was essentially an ultra-stable-microwave type oscillator. Based on these results,
Prof. N. Bloembergen of Harvard University proposed in 1956 a maser capable of continuous-wave
amplification and, within three months the theory was embodied in an operating unit.
How It Works
The maser is a rather exotic piece of equipment, combining a rare gem (usually ruby) and extremely
low temperatures to produce amplification. Unlike most other devices in electronics, the maser
makes use of bound electrons to accomplish amplification. There is no flow of electrons as in
a tube or transistor. It is a property of these bound electrons that they spin on their axes very
much the same way as the earth spins on its axis. We all know that a moving charge is a current
and, associated with every current is a magnetic field. The spinning electron is charge in motion
and this causes the electron to have a magnetic field. Normally the spin is randomly oriented
but when this "electron spin" is placed in a d.c. magnetic field, the electron's magnetic field
normally aligns itself parallel to the d.c. field. The action is similar to that of a compass
The electron spin with its field aligned with the d.c. field possesses a discrete amount of
energy. Now, the electron spin can take up another position, namely, against the field. Energy
must be expended in "flipping" the spin over. Thus, an electron spin aligned against the d.c.
field has more energy than one aligned with it. In a substance containing many of these spins,
the condition pictured in Fig. 1 will exist. Some spins will be aligned with and some against
the d.c. field. It can be seen that two definite energy levels exist and that the difference in
energy is directly proportional to the applied d.c. magnetic field.
The above condition is for a substance possessing one net electron spin per atom. If the substance
possesses two net electron spins per atom, it will have three energy levels - one for both spins
aligned with the d.c. field, one for both spins aligned against, and one for one spin aligned
with and one spin aligned against the d.c. field. In the case of three net electron spins, there
are four energy levels and so on. Chromium-doped ruby, which is the primary maser material today,
has three net electron spins per atom. Ruby is a single crystal of aluminum oxide with a small
percentage (.05%) of chromium. This small percentage of chromium is what gives ruby its characteristic
red color. It is also the chromium which provides the three net electron spins necessary for maser
Quantum physics states that the difference in energy (Δ E) between two levels can be
equated to frequency (f) by the simple formula: Δ E = hf, where h is Planck's constant.
Now we can change the graph of energy levels and write frequency in place of energy. Fig, 2 shows
the energy levels for ruby plotted in this manner.
There are approximately 7 x 1010 electron spins in a cubic centimeter of ruby and,
of these, a certain percentage of spins are in each of the four energy levels. The number of spins
in each level a function of the temperature of the crystal. At room temperature the four levels
are almost equally populated but at liquid helium temperature, 4.2° above absolute zero. the
populations of the four levels are substantially unbalanced. (Absolute zero is also known as zero
degree Kelvin, or K, and represents a temperature of 273 degrees below zero C or 460 degrees below
zero F.) The solid bars in Fig. 3 represent a typical energy population distribution for ruby.
From the diagram it can be seen that the lower energy levels are more heavily populated than the
The operation of a 3-level maser can be explained from an energy level diagram. The term "3-level
maser" means that only three energy levels are used in attaining maser operation even though there
may be a greater number of energy levels in the material. If we inject into the crystal a strong
r.f. signal from a local oscillator, equal in frequency to the difference between energy levels
1 and 3, an interesting phenomenon takes place. Some of the electron spins in the lower level
absorb energy from the r.f. field and jump to level three. If the local-oscillator r.f. signal,
usually called the "pump signal," is strong enough, the "pump" transition (level 1 to level 3)
can be saturated, i.e., the number of spins in level 3 can be made equal to that in level 1. The
total number of spins in the two levels has not changed, but now they are equally populated. Levels
2 and 4 are unaffected since their natural frequencies have not been involved. This "pumped" condition
is shown in Fig. 3 by the dashed bars. It can be seen that level 2 now possesses more electron
spins than level 1. This is contrary to the normal equilibrium condition.
If a signal which is equal in frequency to the difference between energy levels 1 and 2 is
now fed into the crystal, spins in level 2 will be stimulated to emit energy to the signal rather
than absorb energy from it. In the process they will flip over and fall back down to level 1.
This giving up of energy to the signal frequency is amplification. By varying the d.c. magnetic
field, the operating point in Fig. 2 is varied, thereby changing the spacing of the levels and
"maser action" can be obtained at other frequencies. This is the basic scheme of maser operation.
Sophisticated techniques have been developed using more than three levels, double-pumping arrangements,
and harmonic and sub-harmonic schemes; but it all boils down to the same fact. To accomplish amplification,
a greater population must exist in a higher energy level than in a lower one.
The low-noise characteristic of a maser is more difficult to explain but it is extremely important.
In conventional receivers the main source of background noise is from random emission from hot
cathodes, shot noise in tubes, and random thermal noise in resistors. Since, with the maser, amplification
occurs without the use of hot cathodes and tubes, it is logical to expect that noise from such
sources does not exist. Also, the components that could produce noise are at an extremely low
temperature, a few degrees above the point where all thermal motion ceases to exist. This is only
part of the low-noise story because, for quantum-mechanical reasons, noise is even lower than
the helium-bath temperature would predict.
Types of Masers
There are two basic types of maser configuration, the cavity maser and the traveling-wave maser,
The first maser amplifiers constructed were cavity masers. In this type, resonant circuits
are used to inject the r.f. signals into the ruby crystal. The early cavity masers consisted of
a single microwave waveguide cavity resonant at two frequencies; the pump and the signal. The
maser material was placed inside the microwave cavity. This first type of cavity maser had the
disadvantage of operating at a single fixed frequency. Later, cavity masers of a tunable nature
were designed. A tunable maser structure is shown in Fig. 4. It consists of a waveguide resonant
cavity which is resonant at the pump frequency, and a quarter-wave coaxial resonator, resonant
at the signal frequency. The coaxial resonator is constructed inside the waveguide resonator.
The maser material is placed inside the resonant cavity. The r.f. signals are coupled into the
cavity by adjustable loops.
The cavity maser is a one-port amplifier; that is, the input and output have the same common
terminals. In order for this type of amplifier to operate, a non-reciprocal device called a "circulator"
is necessary. The circulator acts as a traffic cop (see Fig. 5). A signal that enters port 1 is
directed to port 2, a signal that enters port 2 is directed to port 3; and so on around the loop.
The cavity maser has many inherent problems: (1) it must be manually tuned; (2) the noise figure
is degraded by "lossy" input components; (3) the unit's stability is not too good; and (4) saturation
effects occur at relatively low power levels. At the onset of saturation the maser loses gain
and becomes transparent, acting very much like a piece of transmission line. The receiver's second
stage is usually capable of picking up the saturating signal and completing the reception. Once
the maser saturates, it takes a considerable amount of time after the saturating signal is withdrawn
to return to normal operation. If, during this time, a low-level signal enters the system, it
is lost. This is the only drawback of the maser. Presently, this "recovery" time is on the order
of 50 milliseconds but crystal-line materials are being developed which will reduce this figure
The traveling-wave maser corrected most of the drawbacks of the cavity type. It employs a transmission
type of coupling between the r.f. signal energy and the crystal rather than the resonant technique
used in the cavity maser. There are many advantages in this type of unit. The overall system noise
figure is reduced by the elimination of the circulator, it is much more stable, it can be electronically
tuned, its bandwidth is greater, and its saturation characteristic is improved.
In this method of operation (Fig. 6), the signal enters at one end of the structure, travels
along a transmission line past a slab of ruby, picking up gain as it goes. The amplified signal
leaves at the other end. In a cavity maser the fields are built up by a resonant technique to
enhance the interaction of the signal with the crystal. In the TWM, the signal reacts very weakly
with the crystal and the gain per inch of structure is small. For a signal traveling at its normal
speed, the speed of light, the structure would have to be 50 to 70 feet long to attain a gain
of 20 db. This is not practical so the signal is slowed down by using a series of metal rods forming
a comb structure in which the signal is bounced back and forth before it emerges at the output.
The signal is then slowed down, and this increases the reaction time between the signal and the
ruby crystal. Gains of 25 db can be obtained in lengths of 5 to 10 inches in sections of this
type. This technique is not new, it has been used very effectively in many devices. The traveling-wave
tube is an excellent example of a device using the same technique. The TWM is made oscillation-proof
by the inclusion of small ferrite isolators between each finger in the slow-wave structure. These
isolators look transparent to a signal traveling in the forward direction but very "lossy" to
a signal traveling in the reverse direction. This eliminates any regenerative effects which are
the primary cause of instability and oscillations. The pump power is introduced into the crystal
in the same resonant manner as in the cavity maser.
In order to operate a maser, the ruby crystal must be kept at a very low temperature, usually
at or below 4.2° absolute. The only substance that is liquid at such low temperatures is helium.
Liquid helium boils (that is, turns into a gas) at 4.2° absolute. Because liquid helium boils
at such a low temperature, elaborate systems have had to be devised to contain it. In fact, the
whole science of cryogenics has developed around liquid helium, its production, storage, and effect
on other materials at very low temperatures.
Complete ruby maser developed for Signal Corps by Hughes. Assembly weighs 25 lbs. and is 30"
high and 5" in diameter. Double vacuum assembly contains liquid helium and nitrogen for supercooling
a half-inch square ruby crystal to only a few degrees above absolute zero. The ruby and a 12-ounce
permanent magnet are inside the structure at the very bottom of assembly.
Most masers employ a double Dewar system to establish the continuous cold necessary for operation.
A functional sketch of such a system is shown in Fig. 5 and a number of stainless-steel double
Dewars are shown in the photos. The double Dewar is nothing more than one vacuum bottle inside
another. The inner one is filled with liquid helium and the outer is filled with liquid nitrogen
to reduce dissipation of the helium (liquid nitrogen boils at 77° absolute). The maser structure
is immersed in the liquid helium, supported on long narrow stainless-steel rods which reduce boil
off. With proper design, a single charge of liquid can last from 18 to 24 hours, after this the
Dewar system must be recharged. Cryogenic engineers are developing a closed-cycle system which
will allow continuous operation without recharging. This type of system collects the helium gas
as it boils off, re-liquefies it, and returns it to the Dewar. When these closed systems become
readily available, we can expect to see greater use of masers. Currently, the open helium systems
are not very desirable - recharging is tricky and costly, storage of the liquids is difficult,
and the supply of liquid helium is very limited.
The operation of a TWM with a closed-loop refrigerating system forms a very practical low-noise
receiver. It can be remotely operated for extended periods of time without maintenance.
The systems applications of masers have been slow in coming, because many components in present
systems were not designed for use with an ultra-low-noise receiver. For a maser to be useful,
the noise contributions of the rest of the system should be of the same order as that of the maser.
It is for this reason that the Bell Telephone Laboratories had to develop a special low-noise
antenna for use with the maser for project "Echo." This is the first system engineered to take
maximum advantage of the maser's characteristics.
Among the many systems that can make good use of the low-noise characteristics of a maser are:
preamplifiers for radio astronomy receivers, radar front ends, and numerous systems that do not
suffer from high background noise.
To take full advantage of a maser one would have to mount it directly at the feed of an antenna.
Giordmaine and Meyer of Columbia University operated a 9000-mc. radio telescope with a maser preamplifier
mounted on the feed of a 50-foot parabolic reflector at the Naval Research Laboratory. The effective
noise temperature of the complete system was 85°K with the maser contributing about 4° maximum
and the antenna 20°. The rest of the noise contributions were due to input losses and the second
stage. If a typical X-band mixer had been used instead of a maser, a noise temperature of 20000K
would not be uncommon. This shows an improvement on the order of 25 times in the reduction in
noise and hence increase in sensitivity with the use of a maser.
B. F. C. Cooper and J. V. Jelley operated a maser radio telescope at 1420 mc. with the maser
mounted at the feed of a 60-foot reflector located at the Harvard College Agassiz Station. The
overall noise characteristics of this maser system were similar to those of the X-band maser radio
telescope mentioned previously. A unique feature of this system was a closed-loop feedback system
to keep the maser gain constant.
The use of a maser as a preamplifier for a radar receiver was first accomplished by Hughes
Aircraft Company. A 10-db improvement in the effective noise temperature was obtained as compared
to the normal receiver operation. The main problem with a maser when used with a pulsed radar
is that the maser saturates from pulse leakage. To overcome this deficiency, a special low-loss
ferrite switch had to be constructed. This switch inserted about 30-db loss when the radar was
in the transmitting state. In the receiving state the switch loss was only about 0.25 db. The
overall 10-db improvement with the use of a maser almost doubled the range of the radar.
The maser has proven that it can detect and amplify signals better than any other type of receiver.
We can expect the maser to develop from a laboratory curiosity to the workhorse of ultra-low-noise
receiving systems. The major drawback to a maser is the necessity of maintaining low temperature
for operation. Hughes Aircraft has operated a maser successfully at liquid nitrogen temperatures
using the present maser material (ruby).
In the future we can expect the development of new materials that will permit operation at
higher temperatures. For masers operating at 4.2°K, there is a recovery time problem, which will
only be corrected with the development of new maser materials. There are a number of new, materials
that look promising for 4.2°K and higher temperatures, among them iron-doped sapphire and iron-
or chromium-doped titanium dioxide (known as rutile or titania). For frequencies above 10,000
mc., there is no other type of amplifier that can approach, even closely, the extremely low noise
and high sensitivity of a maser. Masers have already been operated from 400 to 75,000 mc. Many
laboratories are trying to develop infrared and light masers.1 If successful, these
will be the first amplifiers for such types of electromagnetic radiation. These are but a few
of the things that can be expected. The future for this amazing receiver is certainly beyond the
1 See "The Laser - a Light Amplifier" in our September issue.
Posted December 31, 2013