Module 10—Introduction to Wave Propagation, Transmission Lines, and Antennas
i - ix
, 1-1 to 1-10
1-11 to 1-20
, 1-21 to 1-30
1-31 to 1-40
, 1-41 to 1-47
2-1 to 2-10
, 2-11 to 2-20
2-21 to 2-30
, 2-31 to 2-40
2-40 to 2-47
, 3-1 to 3-10
3-11 to 3-20
, 3-21 to 3-30
3-31 to 3-40
, 3-41 to 3-50
3-51 to 3-58
, 4-1 to 4-10
4-11 to 4-20
, 4-21 to 4-30
4-31 to 4-40
, 4-41 to 4-50
4-51 to 4-60
Figure 4-8.—Satellite transmissions using polarized radiation.
Advantages of Vertical Polarization
Simple vertical antennas can be used to
provide OMNIDIRECTIONAL (all directions) communication. This is an advantage when communications must take place
from a moving vehicle.
In some overland communications, such as in vehicular installations, antenna
heights are limited to 3 meters (10 feet) or less. In such instances vertical polarization results in a stronger
receiver signal than does horizontal polarization at frequencies up to about 50 megahertz. From approximately 50
to 100 megahertz, vertical polarization results in a slightly stronger signal than does horizontal polarization
with antennas at the same height. Above 100 megahertz, the difference in signal strength is negligible.
For transmission over bodies of water, vertical polarization is much better than horizontal polarization for
antennas at the lower heights. As the frequency increases, the minimum antenna height decreases. At 30 megahertz,
vertical polarization is better for antenna heights below about 91 meters (300 feet); at 85 megahertz, antenna
heights below 15 meters (50 feet); and still lower heights at the high frequencies. Therefore, at ordinary antenna
mast heights of 12 meters (40 feet), vertical polarization is advantageous for frequencies less than about 100
Radiation is somewhat less affected by reflections from aircraft flying over the transmission
path when vertical polarization is used instead of horizontal polarization. With horizontal polarization, such
reflections cause variations in received signal strength. This factor is important in locations where aircraft
traffic is heavy.
When vertical polarization is used, less interference is produced or picked up because
of strong vhf and uhf broadcast transmissions (television and fm). This is because vhf and uhf transmissions use
horizontal polarization. This factor is important when an antenna must be located in an urban area having several
television and fm broadcast stations.
Advantages of Horizontal Polarization
A simple horizontal antenna is
bi-directional. This characteristic is useful when you desire to minimize interference from certain directions.
Horizontal antennas are less likely to pick up man-made interference, which ordinarily is vertically polarized.
When antennas are located near dense forests or among buildings, horizontally polarized waves suffer lower
losses than vertically polarized waves, especially above 100 megahertz. Small changes in antenna locations do not
cause large variations in the field intensity of horizontally polarized waves. When vertical polarization is used,
a change of only a few meters in the antenna location may have a considerable effect on the received signal
strength. This is the result of interference patterns that produce standing waves in space when spurious
reflections from trees or buildings occur.
When simple antennas are used, the transmission line, which is usually vertical, is less affected by a
horizontally mounted antenna. When the antenna is mounted at right angles to the transmission line and horizontal
polarization is used, the line is kept out of the direct field of the antenna. As a result, the radiation pattern
and electrical characteristics of the antenna are practically unaffected by the presence of the vertical
Q10. What type of polarization should be used at medium and low frequencies?
Q11. What is an advantage
of using horizontal polarization at high frequencies?
Q12. What type of polarization should be used if
an antenna is mounted on a moving vehicle at frequencies below 50 megahertz?
Radiated energy is the useful part of the transmitter's signal.
However, it represents as much of a loss to the antenna as the energy lost in heating the antenna wire. In either
case, the dissipated power is equal to I2R. In the case of heat losses, the R is real resistance. In the case of
radiation, R is an assumed resistance; if this resistance were actually present, it would dissipate the same
amount of power that the antenna takes to radiate the energy. This assumed resistance is referred to as the
Radiation resistance varies at different points on the antenna. This resistance is always measured at a current
loop. For the antenna in free space, that is, entirely removed from any objects that might affect its operation,
the radiation resistance is 73 ohms. A practical antenna located over a ground plane may have any value of
radiation resistance from 0 to approximately 100 ohms. The exact value of radiation resistance depends on the
height of the antenna above the ground. For most half-wave wire antennas, the radiation resistance is about 65
ohms. It will usually vary between 55 and 600 ohms for antennas constructed of rod or tubing. The actual value of
radiation resistance, so long as it is 50 ohms or more, has little effect on the radiation efficiency of the
antenna. This is because the ohmic resistance is about 1 ohm for conductors of large diameter. The ohmic
resistance does not become important until the radiation resistance drops to a value less than 10 ohms. This may
be the case when several antennas are coupled together.
RADIATION TYPES AND PATTERNS
The energy radiated from an antenna forms a field having a
definite RADIATION PATTERN. A radiation pattern is a plot of the radiated energy from an antenna. This energy is
measured at various angles at a constant distance from the antenna. The shape of this pattern depends on the type
used. In this section, we will introduce the basic types of radiation (isotropic and anisotropic) and
their radiation patterns.
Some antenna sources radiate energy
equally in all directions. Radiation of this type is known as ISOTROPIC RADIATION. We all know the Sun radiates
energy in all directions. The energy radiated from the Sun measured at any fixed distance and from any angle will
be approximately the same. Assume that a measuring device is moved around the Sun and stopped at the points
indicated in figure 4-9 to make a measurement of the amount of radiation. At any point around the circle, the
distance from the measuring device to the Sun is the same. The measured radiation will also be the same. The Sun
is therefore considered an isotropic radiator.
Figure 4-9.—Isotropic radiator.
To plot this pattern, we will assume that the radiation is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 units and that
the measured amount of radiation is 7 units at all points. We will then plot our measurements on two different
types of graphs, rectangular- and polar-coordinate graphs. The RECTANGULAR- COORDINATE GRAPH of the measured
radiation, shown in view A of figure 4-10, is a straight line plotted against positions along the circle. View B
shows the POLAR-COORDINATE GRAPH for the same isotropic source.
Figure 4-10.—Comparison of rectangular- and polar-coordinate graphs for an isotropic source.
In the rectangular-coordinate graph, points are located by projection from a pair of stationary,
perpendicular axes. In the polar-coordinate graph, points are located by projection along a rotating axis (radius)
to an intersection with one of several concentric, equally-spaced circles. The horizontal axis on the
rectangular-coordinate graph corresponds to the circles on the polar-coordinate graph. The vertical axis on the
rectangular-coordinate graph corresponds to the rotating axis (radius) on the polar-coordinate graph.
Look at view A of figure 4-10. The numbered positions around the circle are laid out on the HORIZONTAL AXIS of the
graph from 0 to 7 units. The measured radiation is laid out on the VERTICAL AXIS of the graph from 0 to 10 units.
The units on both axes are chosen so the pattern occupies a convenient part of the graph.
and vertical axes are at a right angle to each other. The point where the axes cross each other is known as the
ORIGIN. In this case, the origin is 0 on both axes. Now, assume that a radiation value of 7 units view B is
measured at position 2. From position 2 on the horizontal axis, a dotted line is projected upwards that runs
parallel to the vertical axis. From position 7 on the vertical axis, a line is projected to the right that runs
parallel to the horizontal axis. The point where the two lines cross
(INTERCEPT) represents a value of 7
radiation units at position 2. This is the only point on the graph that can represent this value.
can see from the figure, the lines used to plot the point form a rectangle. For this reason, this type of plot is
called a rectangular-coordinate graph. A new rectangle is formed for each different point plotted. In this
example, the points plotted lie in a straight line extending from 7 units on the vertical scale to the projection
of position 7 on the horizontal scale. This is the characteristic pattern in rectangular coordinates of an
isotropic source of radiation.
graph has proved to be of great use in studying radiation patterns. Compare views A and B of figure 4-10. Note the
great difference in the shape of the radiation pattern when it is
transferred from the rectangular-coordinate graph in view A to the polar-coordinate graph in view B.
The scale of radiation values used in both graphs is identical, and the measurements taken are both the same.
However, the shape of the pattern is drastically different.
Look at view B of figure 4-10 and assume that
the center of the concentric circles is the Sun. Assume that a radius is drawn from the Sun (center of the circle)
to position 0 of the circle. When you move to position 1, the radius moves to position 1; when you move to
position 2, the radius also moves to position 2, and so on.
The positions where a measurement was taken
are marked as 0 through 7 on the graph. Note how the position of the radius indicates the actual direction from
the source at which the measurement was taken. This is a distinct advantage over the rectangular-coordinate graph
in which the position is indicated along a straight-line axis and has no physical relation to the actual direction
of measurement. Now that we have a way to indicate the direction of measurement, we must devise a way to indicate
the magnitude of the radiation.
Notice that the rotating axis is always drawn from the center of the graph to some position on the edge of the
graph. As the axis moves toward the edge of the graph, it passes through a set of equally-spaced, concentric
circles. In this example view B, they are numbered successively from 1 to 10 from the center out. These circles
are used to indicate the magnitude of the radiation.
The advantages of the polar-coordinate graph are
immediately evident. The source, which is at the center of the observation circles, is also at the center of the
graph. By looking at a polar-coordinate plot of a radiation pattern, you can immediately see the direction and
strength of radiation put out by the source. Therefore, the polar-coordinate graph is more useful than the
rectangular-coordinate graph in plotting radiation patterns.
Most radiators emit (radiate) stronger radiation in one direction than in another. A radiator such as this is
referred to as ANISOTROPIC. An example of an anisotropic radiator is an ordinary flashlight. The beam of the
flashlight lights only a portion of the space surrounding it. If a circle is drawn with the flashlight as the
center, as shown in view B of figure 4-11, the radiated light can be measured at different positions around the
circle. Again, as with the isotropic radiator, all positions are the same distance from the center, but at
different angles. However, in this illustration the radiated light is measured at 16 different positions on the
Figure 4-11.—Anisotropic radiator.
Directly behind the flashlight (position 0) the radiation measured is minimum. Accordingly, a 0 value is
assigned to this position in the rectangular-coordinate graph (fig. 4-11, view A). This radiation remains at
minimum until position 4 is reached. Between positions 4 and 6, the measuring device enters the flashlight beam.
You can see this transition from darkness to brightness easily in view B. Radiation is fairly constant between
positions 6 and 10. Maximum brightness occurs at position 8, which is directly in the path of the flashlight beam.
From positions 10 to 12, the measuring device leaves the flashlight beam and the radiation measurement falls off
sharply. At position 13 the radiation is again at 0 and stays at this value back to position 0.
from a light source and radiation from an antenna are both forms of electromagnetic waves. Therefore, the
measurement of radiation of an antenna follows the same basic procedure as that just described for the Sun and the
flashlight. Before proceeding further with the study of antenna patterns, you should be sure you understand the
methods used to graph the measured radiation (magnitude of the radiation). Study the rectangular- and
polar-coordinate systems of plotting presented in the following section.
Q13. What is the radiation
resistance of a half-wave antenna in free space?
Q14. A radiating source that radiates energy stronger
in one direction than another is known as what type of radiator?
Q15. A radiating source that radiates
energy equally in all directions is known as what type of radiator?
Q16. A flashlight is an example of
what type of radiator?
In figure 4-11, view A, the radiation pattern of the flashlight is graphed in
rectangular coordinates. The illustration of the flashlight beam in view B clearly indicates the shape of the
flashlight beam. This is not evident in the radiation pattern plotted on the rectangular-coordinate graph. Now
look at figure 4-12. The radiation pattern shown in this figure looks very much like the actual flashlight beam.
The pattern in figure 4-12 is plotted using the same values as those of figure 4-11, view A, but is drawn using
Figure 4-12.—Polar-coordinate graph for anisotropic radiator.
The positions marked off on the two polar-coordinate graphs in figures 4-10 and 4-12 were selected and
numbered arbitrarily. However, a standard method allows the positions around a source to be marked off so that one
radiation pattern can easily be compared with another. This method is based on the fact that a circle has a radius
of 360 degrees. The radius extending vertically from the center (position 0 in figure 4-10) is designated 0
degrees. At position 4 the radius is at a right angle to the 0-degree radius. Accordingly, the radius at position
4 is marked 90 degrees, position 8 is 180 degrees, position 12 is 270 degrees, and position 16 is 360 degrees. The
various radii drawn on the graph are all marked according to the angle each radius makes with the reference radius
at 0 degrees.
The radiation pattern in figure 4-12 is obtained by using the same procedure that was used for (figure 4-10, view
B). The radiation measured at positions 1, 2, 3, and 4 is 0. Position 5 measures approximately 1 unit. This is
marked on the graph and the rotating radius moves to position 6. At this position a reading of 5.5 units is taken.
As before, this point is marked on the graph. The procedure is repeated around the circle and a reading is
obtained from positions 6 through 11. At position 12 no radiation is indicated, and this continues on to position
The polar-coordinate graph now shows a definite area enclosed by the radiation pattern. This pattern
indicates the general direction of radiation from the source. The enclosed area is called a LOBE. Outside of this
area, minimum radiation is emitted in any direction. For example, at position 2 the radiation is 0. Such a point
is called a NULL. In real situations, some radiation is usually transmitted in all directions. Therefore, a null
is used to indicate directions of minimum radiation. The pattern of figure 4-12 shows one lobe and one continuous
You will sometimes want to use one antenna system for transmitting and receiving on several different frequencies.
Since the antenna must always be in resonance with the applied frequency, you may need to either physically or
electrically lengthen or shorten the antenna.
Except for trailing-wire antennas used in aircraft installations (which may be lengthened or
shortened), physically lengthening the antenna is not very practical. But you can achieve the same result by
changing the electrical length of the antenna. To change the electrical length, you can insert either an inductor
or a capacitor in series with the antenna. This is shown in figure 4-13, views A and B. Changing the electrical
length by this method is known as LUMPED-IMPEDANCE TUNING, or LOADING. The electrical length of any antenna wire
can be increased or decreased by loading. If the antenna is too short for the wavelength being used, it is
resonant at a higher frequency than that at which it is being excited. Therefore, it offers a capacitive reactance
at the excitation frequency. This capacitive reactance can be compensated for by introducing a lumped-inductive
reactance, as shown in view A. Similarly, if the antenna is too long for the transmitting frequency, it offers an
inductive reactance. Inductive reactance can be compensated for by introducing a lumped-capacitive reactance, as
shown in view B. An antenna without loading is represented in view C.
Figure 4-13.—Electrically equal antenna.
Before you look at the various types of antennas, consider the relationship between the wavelength at
which the antenna is being operated and the actual length of the antenna. An antenna does not necessarily radiate
or receive more energy when it is made longer. Specific dimensions must be used for efficient antenna operation.
Nearly all antennas have been developed from two basic types, the Hertz and the Marconi. The basic Hertz antenna
is 1/2 wavelength long at the operating frequency and is insulated from ground. It is often called a DIPOLE or a
DOUBLET. The basic Marconi antenna is 1/4 wavelength long and is either grounded at one end or connected to a
network of wires called a COUNTERPOISE. The ground or counterpoise provides the equivalent of an additional 1/4
wavelength, which is required for the antenna to resonate.
half-wave antenna (referred to as a dipole, Hertz, or doublet) consists of two lengths of wire rod, or tubing,
each 1/4 wavelength long at a certain frequency. It is the basic unit from which many complex antennas are
constructed. The half-wave antenna operates independently of ground; therefore, it may be installed far above the
surface of the Earth or other absorbing bodies. For a dipole, the current is
maximum at the center and minimum at the ends. Voltage is minimum at the center and maximum at the
ends, as was shown in figure 4-6.
In the following discussion,
the term DIPOLE is used to mean the basic half-wave antenna. The term DOUBLET is used to indicate an antenna that
is very short compared with the wavelength of the operating frequency. Physically, it has the same shape as the
RADIATION PATTERN OF A DOUBLET.—The doublet is the simplest form of a practical antenna. Its
radiation pattern can be plotted like the radiation pattern of the flashlight (fig. 4-12). Figure 4-14 shows the
development of vertical and horizontal patterns for a doublet. This in NOT a picture of the radiation, but
three-dimensional views of the pattern itself. In three views the pattern resembles a doughnut. From the
dimensions in these views, two types of polar-coordinate patterns can be drawn, horizontal and vertical. The
HORIZONTAL PATTERN view A is derived from the solid pattern view C by slicing it horizontally. This produces view
B, which is converted to the polar coordinates seen in view A. The horizontal pattern illustrates that the
radiation is constant in any direction along the horizontal plane.
Figure 4-14.—Development of vertical and horizontal patterns.
A VERTICAL PATTERN view E is obtained from the drawing of the vertical plane view D of the radiation
pattern view C. The radiation pattern view C is sliced in half along a vertical plane through the antenna. This
produces the vertical plane pattern in view D. Note how the vertical plane in view D of the radiation pattern
differs from the horizontal plane in view B. The vertical pattern view E exhibits two lobes and two nulls. The
difference between the two patterns is caused by two facts: (1) no radiation is
emitted from the ends of the doublet; and (2) maximum radiation comes from the doublet in a direction
perpendicular to the antenna axis. This type of radiation pattern is both NONDIRECTIONAL (in a horizontal plane)
and DIRECTIONAL (in a vertical plane).
From a practical viewpoint, the doublet antenna can be mounted
either vertically or horizontally. The doublet shown in figure 4-14 is mounted vertically, and the radiated energy
spreads out about the antenna in every direction in the horizontal plane. Since ordinarily the horizontal plane is
the useful plane, this arrangement is termed NONDIRECTIONAL. The directional characteristics of the antenna in
other planes is ignored. If the doublet were mounted horizontally, it would have the effect of turning the pattern
on edge, reversing the patterns given in figure 4-14. The antenna would then be directional in the horizontal
plane. The terms "directional" and "nondirectional" are used for convenience in describing specific radiation
patterns. A complete description always involves a figure in three dimensions, as in the radiation pattern of
Q17. What terms are often used to describe basic half-wave antennas?
Q18. If a
basic half-wave antenna is mounted vertically, what type of radiation pattern will be produced?
which plane will the half-wave antenna be operating if it is mounted horizontally?
PATTERN OF A DIPOLE.—The radiation pattern of a dipole (fig. 4-15) is similar to that of the doublet
(fig. 4-14). Increasing the length of the doublet to 1/2 wavelength has the effect of flattening out the radiation
pattern. The radiation pattern in the horizontal plane of a dipole is a larger circle than that of the doublet.
The vertical-radiation pattern lobes are no longer circular. They are flattened out and the radiation intensity is
Figure 4-15.—Radiation pattern of a dipole.
Introduction to Matter, Energy, and Direct Current,
to Alternating Current and Transformers, Introduction to Circuit Protection,
Control, and Measurement
, Introduction to Electrical Conductors, Wiring Techniques,
and Schematic Reading
, Introduction to Generators and Motors
Introduction to Electronic Emission, Tubes, and Power Supplies,
Introduction to Solid-State Devices and Power Supplies
Introduction to Amplifiers, Introduction to
Wave-Generation and Wave-Shaping Circuits
, Introduction to Wave Propagation, Transmission
Lines, and Antennas
, Microwave Principles,
, Introduction to Number Systems and Logic Circuits, Introduction
to Microelectronics, Principles of Synchros, Servos, and Gyros
Introduction to Test Equipment
, Radar Principles,
The Technician's Handbook,
Master Glossary, Test Methods and Practices,
Introduction to Digital Computers,
Magnetic Recording, Introduction to Fiber Optics