The following paper titled "The
Design of Ultra Narrowband Amplifiers Using Small Signal Varactor Upconverters for ESM, ECM, ECCM, and ELINT Applications"
was submitted for publication by Planar Monolithics Industries, Inc. (PMI), and has been duly accepted by the
Technical Committee and Management of EWCI2014.
Dr. Alfred I. Grayzel, Dr. Ashok (Ash) K. Gorwara, Paul Kuhn Planar Monolithics Industries, Inc.,
Frederick, Maryland USA
sales@pmirf.com
ABSTRACT:
A method is presented in this paper for realizing tunable
amplifiers with bandwidths of less than 0.5%; without the use of superconductors and cryogenic cooling. This method
uses a small signal varactor upconverter to achieve these ultra narrow bandwidths. The equivalent circuit for the
upconverter is presented as well as the circuit configuration of the narrow band negative resistance amplifier.
The design and experimental results are presented for a 0.5% bandwidth negative resistance amplifier at 800 MHz;
using this unique circuit design. These devices and circuits can be used for electronic warfare applications such
as surveillance, electronic reconnaissance, jamming and frequency hopping.
I. INTRODUCTION
This paper presents a method of realizing tunable microwave amplifiers with ultra narrow bandwidths
that can be less than 0.5% by the use of a varactor upconverter (UC)[1]. In the past the UC has been used to upconvert
an input signal at frequency f_{S} to a signal at frequency f_{S}+f_{P} where the varactor
is “pumped” at frequency f_{P}. In this paper we will use the property of the UC that when it is terminated
at frequency f_{S} in an impedance Z(ω_{S}) where ω_{S}=2πf_{S},
this impedance is “imaged” at the output frequency f_{S}+f_{P},[2]. For example: if a bandpass filter
with a passband from 97.5 to 102.5 MHz is terminated in a negative resistance and connected to the input terminals
of a UC “pumped” at a frequency of 900 MHz, then the negative resistance will be ”imaged” at the output of
the UC over the frequency band from 997.5 to 1002.5 MHz. Thus the 5% bandwidth of the input circuit results
in a 0.5% bandwidth at the output of the UC. If the pump frequency is tuned to 870 MHz, then the negative resistance
will be “imaged” over the passband from 967.5 to 972.5 MHz. Thus by varying the pump frequency the passband
can be tuned while preserving the bandwidth. The equations describing this “imaging” are presented in this paper
for the small signal varactor upconverter.
II. THE NEGATIVE RESISTANCE AMPLIFIER
Fig.1 shows the configuration of the negative resistance amplifier described in this paper.
Fig.1 – The Negative Resistance Amplifier Configuration
A circulator of characteristic impedance Z_{0}, has port 1 as the input port, port 3 as the output port
and has port 2 terminated in a tunable negative resistance network. Let us consider an idealized negative resistance
network, whose input impedance has a real part equal to –R and an imaginary part equal to zero over the frequency
range from f_{1} to f_{2}. Outside of this frequency range the real part of the impedance is zero.
Since the output power at port 3 of the circulator is equal to the magnitude squared of the reflection coefficient
at port 2 of the circulator the gain of the amplifier over the frequency range from f_{1} to f_{2}
is given by:
G = ((1+ R) / (1 R))^{2}
(1)
Outside of this frequency range the amplifier has a gain of one. The negative resistance network shown
in Fig.1 is the heart of this amplifier; it’s output impedance must approximate the impedance characteristic described
above over the tuning range of the amplifier.
The block diagram, of the negative resistance network of Fig.1
is shown in Fig.2.
Fig.2 – The Tunable Negative Resistance Network
A varactor shunted by a bias network is connected to three filter/matching networks. The first is a bandpass
filter/matching network terminated in a negative resistance, which serves as the input to the upconverter. It has
a passband from f_{1} to f_{2}, with center frequency f_{S} and must present a high impedance
at frequencies f_{P} and f_{S}+f_{P}. The second bandpass filter/matching network has a
center frequency f_{P} which is connected to a tunable oscillator tuned to f_{P}; the pump frequency
and must present a high impedance at frequencies f_{S} and f_{S}+f_{P}. The third bandpass
filter/matching network has a center frequency f_{S}+f_{P} and must present a high impedance at
frequencies f_{S} and f_{P}. It serves as the output of the negative resistance network. Fig. 3
shows the configuration for the example cited above where f_{S}=100 MHz, f_{P}=900 MHz
and f_{S}+f_{P}=1.0GHz.
Fig.3 – The Network of Fig.2 with f_{S}=100 MHz, f_{P}=900 MHz and f_{S}+f_{P}=1.0
GHz
It is shown in reference [2] for the small signal UC that when the UC is terminated at its output port, in an
impedance Z_{L2}(ω_{S}+ ω_{P}), the input impedance of the UC is given by:
(2)
where V_{S} is the voltage across the varactor and I_{S} is the current flowing through
the varactor at frequency f_{S}. It is also shown that when the UC is terminated in an impedance Z_{L1}(ω_{S}),
the output impedance of the UC is given by:
(3)
where V_{S+P} is the varactor, I_{S+P} is the current flowing through the varactor at
frequency f_{S}+f_{P}., and voltage across S_{0} is the average susceptance of the varactor
as pumped[1]. The value of (K_{TR})^{2} is given by:
(4)
where, S_{1} is the fundamental component of the incremental elastance pumped at frequency f_{P}.
It follows from (2) and (3) that the equivalent circuit of the UC can be drawn as shown in Fig.3, consisting of
a frequency translating impedance inverter K_{TR} with series capacitors connected to input and output.
The value of these capacitors is equal to the reciprocal of the average susceptance of the varactor as pumped. The
pump circuit is not shown however, (K_{TR})^{2} is a function of the current supplied by the pump
oscillator at frequency f_{P}. Thus the “imaging” referred to above is defined by (2) and (3) or by the
circuit of Fig. 4. The two series capacitors can be incorporated into the input bandpass filter/matching network
and the output bandpass filter/matching network.
Fig.4 – The Equivalent Circuit of a Small Signal UpConverter
For example: if Z_{L1}(ω_{S}) has a value of 50 ohms and (K_{TR})^{2}
equals 1750, then Z_{out} equals 35 ohms, and the gain of the amplifier is found using (1) to be equal
to 15 dB.
Fig.5 shows a computer analysis of the gain of the amplifier shown in Fig.1 and Fig.2.
Fig.5 – Computer Generated Gain of a Negative Resistance Amplifier Tuned in 100 MHz Steps
The pump frequency was tuned from 970 MHz to 1.3 GHz in 100 MHz steps. K_{TR} was chosen at
each pump frequency for a gain of 15 dB. This can be accomplished in practice by using a digitally controlled
oscillator followed by a digitally controlled attenuator in the pump circuit. A six section Butterworth filter with
a 5% bandwidth and a center frequency of 100 MHz was used for the input filter in this computer simulation.
The output filter is a five section Tschebyscheff filter with a 0.2 dB ripple and an eight percent bandwidth.
The capacitance C_{0} was incorporated into the first resonator of these filters.
The computational
procedure was as follows. Z_{L1}(ω_{S}) the input impedance of the input filter terminated
in a negative resistance of 50 ohms was first computed. Using (3) and (4) the output impedance of the inverter
was then calculated. The input impedance of the output filter terminated in Z_{out}(ω_{S }+ ω_{P})
was then calculated and then using eq. 1 the gain of the amplifier was computed. The computation is exact; it makes
no approximations other than the assumptions of a lossless varactor and lossless filter/matching networks which
have the exact response of the Butterworth and Tcebycheff filters used in the computer simulation.
III. ACHEIVABLE TUNING RANGE
If f_{S} equals 100 MHz and f_{P} is
tuned over the frequency band from 850 to 950 MHz, then the output frequency of the UC will vary from 950 to
1050 MHz. The output filter/matching network must have a passband from 950 to 1050 MHz in order to pass
these frequencies and therefore, cannot reject the pump frequency when the pump is tuned to 950 MHz. Thus the
pump tuning range must be smaller than 850 to 950 MHz and the output tuning range must be smaller than 950
to 1050 MHz. Thus for a ratio of the output to the input frequency of 10, the percent tuning range of the output
frequency is less than 10%.
Let us consider the case where f_{S} is equal to 100 MHz and f_{P}
is tuned over the frequency band from 250 to 350 MHz. The output of the upconverter will then vary from 350
to 450 MHz. The output filter/matching network must then have a passband from 350 to 450 MHz and therefore
cannot reject the pump frequency when the pump is tuned to 350 MHz. Thus the pump tuning range must be smaller
than 250 to 350 MHz and the output tuning range smaller than 350 to 450 MHz. Thus for a ratio of the output
to the input frequency of 4, the output frequency percent tuning range is less than 25%, and a 5% input bandwidth
yields an output bandwidth of 1.25%. There is thus a tradeoff between narrow bandwidth and tuning range.
To achieve greater tuning ranges the circuit of Fig.6 can be used, where two UCs are cascaded.
Fig.6 – A Negative Resistance Amplifier Configuration with Two Cascaded Frequency UpConverters
If the first UC, has an input frequency of 100 MHz and has a pump frequency that can be tuned from 250
to 325 MHz then the output frequency of this UC can be tuned from 350 to 425 MHz. If the second UC has
an input bandwidth from 350 to 425 MHz and has a pump frequency that can be tuned from 450 to 775 MHz
then the output frequency can then be tuned using digitally controlled oscillators, from 800 to 1,200 MHz.
Thus for a ratio of output to input frequency of 10, the percent tuning range of the output frequency for this configuration
is 40%.
To achieve even narrower bandwidths the configuration of Fig. 7 can be used.
Fig.7 – Two Cascaded Frequency UpConverters Configured to Achieve Narrower Bandwidth
If as shown in Fig. 7 a 100 MHz signal is upconverted to 1 GHz in the first upconverter and to 10 GHz
in the second upconverter a 5% bandwidth at the input frequency of 100 MHz results in a 0.05% bandwidth at
the output frequency of 10 GHz.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
An opamp followed by
a bandpass filter with a 5% bandwidth was used for the negative resistance network shown in Fig.2. The gain of this
circuit as an 80 MHz negative resistance amplifier is shown in Fig.8
Fig.8 – A Negative Resistance Amplifier at 80 MHz
The maximum gain was set at 19.6 dB and the gain fell by 14 dB in a bandwidth of about 4.5%. The negative
resistance presented by this negative resistance circuit is then upconverted to 800 MHz. Fig.9 shows the computed
gain of the amplifier at 800 MHz. Measured data will be presented at the conference.
Fig.9 – Computed Gain of Amplifier at 800 MHz
V. ELECTRONIC WAREFARE APPLICATIONS
The research & development work being reported
in this article is basically to report on how it is possible & achievable to increase the Dynamic Range &
Sensitivity of RF/Microwave Receivers used in Electronic Warfare Applications by basically controlling & narrowing
the bandwidth of a Receiver. The issue of bandwidth for ECM Receivers was earlier researched and reported by the
author in a reference paper [3]
as that time there were no easy solutions to narrowing the bandwidth, which are now possible with the advent of
the ultra narrow band amplifiers being reported in this paper that could lead to simply the design of ECM Receivers
not having to deal with the image signals but to concentrate on the information of the modulated signals that are
present on the real carrier.
The Receivers maybe superheterodyne types single or multiple, Down & Upconverters,
Converters, Up/Down converters, Channelized, Tuners, Instantaneous Frequency Monitors(IFM's), Detector Log Video
Amplifiers,(DLVA's), Successive Log Video Amplifiers (SDLVA's), Transponders or Transceivers, Direction Finding(DF),
or Radar Warning(RWR) or used in set on Jammers.
To understand & apply these Ultra Narrow Band Amplifiers
reported here, for ESM, ECM, ECCM, and ELINT applications one must review the theoretical equations that govern
any Receiver design which are as follows:
Minimum Detectable Signal (MDS): In
Reference [4] more details are
given on the theoretical equations and derivations for Diode Detector Receivers and Mixer or Down Converter Type
receivers.
The lowest level signal that is detectable by the Receiver that can be calculated to the first
order is by the equation,
MDS= 114 + NF + 10 log (Br)
NF is in dB Br = RF channel bandwidth
(MHz)
If detection video bandwidth is known, the equation becomes:
MDS= 114 + NF + 10 log sqrt(2BrBv
– 2Bv^{2}) Bv = video detection bandwidth (MHz)
Tangential Sensitivity (TSS):
[5] In this reference
Theory of DLVA, ERDLVA and SDLVA designs is given and explained.
MDS + 4 dB
Minimum Operating
Sensitivity: [6] In this
reference Glossary of Terms and Definition is given and explained
TSS + 5 dB
VI.
CONCLUSION
From the above equations one can view that the Sensitivity and Dynamic range of a Receiver
can be increased by reducing the bandwidth of the Receiver Amplifiers. Lower the bandwidth higher is the Sensitivity.
Almost all Electronic Warfare Receivers and Systems are basically trying to solve the unknown equation below
and determine what all the parameters are in the equation,
The topology or block diagrams of various Receiver types used in Electronic Warfare applications are shown below
as:
VII. REFERENCES
[1] P. P. Penfield, and R. P. Rafuse, VARACTOR APPLICATIONS, Cambridge
Mass. The M.I.T. Press 1962
[2] A. I. Grayzel, VERY NARROWBAND TUNABLE FILTERS AND AMPLIFIERS USING A SMALL
SIGNAL VARACTOR UPCONVERTER, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems
(ICWITS)
[3] A. K. Gorwara, "PHASE AND AMPLITUDE BALANCE, KEY TO IMAGE REJECT MIXERS", Microwaves, October
1972. http://www.pmirf.com/plamic/finalreports/pabalance.pdf
[4] Equation 1V2,Page 1V10, "DIODE BEACON TECHNIQUES” by Dr Ashok Gorwara for Rome Air Development Center,
Griffis Airforce Base, Rome New York, 13440. Stanford Research Institute(SRI) Project 1970,Contract No F3060272C0444,
January 1974. http://www.pmirf.com/plamic/finalreports/diode.pdf
[5] DLVA'S SOLID STATE RECEIVER COMPONENTS  Application NoteTheoretical Background  Log Amplifier Design
by Planar Monolithics Technical team(PMI), Frederick, MD, USA Jan 26 2008,
http://www.pmirf.com/Products/dlva/ApplicationNotesDLVA.htm
[6] DEFINITIONS AND A GLOSSARY OF TERMS FOR DETECTOR LOGARITHMIC VIDEO AMPLIFIERS AND RELATED PRODUCTS by
Planar Monolithics technical team(PMI), Frederick, MD, USA, August 15, 2008,
http://www.pmirf.com/Products/dlva/DLVAGlossaryofTerms.htm
BIO DATA OF AUTHOR(S)
Alfred
I. Grayzel (M’55 SM’85 LM ’92) was born in Brooklyn N.Y. in May 24, 1933. He received a B.A. from Columbia College
in N.Y.C. in 1954 and a B.S.E.E. from the Columbia School of engineering in 1955. He received an M.S.E.E. and a
Ph.D. in electrical engineering from M.I.T. in 1961 and 1963. He spent 17 years of his career at M.I.T.’s Lincoln
Laboratory as a staff member. In 1975 he founded A.I. Grayzel Inc. which manufactured unconditionally stable varactor
frequency multipliers and upconverters. The company was acquired by the Anzac Corporation in 1985. He is currently
a consultant to PMI, USA.
Dr.
Ashok(Ash) Gorwara attended University of London for BSEE, MSEE, Ph.D/DSEE doctoral studies. Postdoctoral, Lecturer
at MIT, & Northeastern University, Boston, USA going onto further Research/Development at MITLincoln Laboratories &
Stanford Research (SRI), California for Electronic Warfare Components, Subsystems & Satellite Communications.
Presently President & CEO, Owner, Chief Technical Officer of PMI, USA
Posted January 14, 2014
