A white paper has been published by Linx Technologies titled, "How
to Understand an Antenna Data Sheet." Author, Shawn Hogan, VP of Engineering, writes, "The information on an
antenna data sheet is nothing short of overwhelming. It can be difficult to maneuver through to select the best
antenna for your design. There are several factors to take into account when looking at an antenna data sheet including:
monopole vs. dipole antennas, the electrical parameters, counterpoise, gain and radiation pattern. Our goal is to
break down these features so you can use that knowledge to discover advantages and disadvantages of different antennas
as they relate to your specific application..."
This article is an entry in Linx's new
How to Understand an
Antenna Data Sheet
information on an antenna data sheet is nothing short of overwhelming. It can be difficult to maneuver through to
select the best antenna for your design. There are several factors to take into account when looking at an antenna
data sheet including: monopole vs. dipole antennas, the electrical parameters, counterpoise, gain and radiation
pattern. Our goal is to break down these features so you can use that knowledge to discover advantages and disadvantages
of different antennas as they relate to your specific application.
Monopole vs. Dipole
Let’s talk antenna main
classifications. In general, antennas used on low-power devices in the ISM band can be classified as either monopoles
or dipoles. A dipole is the most fundamental antenna design. It consists of two identical conductive elements which
are usually symmetrical. The length of the antenna is typically half of the wavelength of the frequency being used,
giving rise to the term half-wave dipole. Other lengths are possible, but they are less efficient and not as common
in ISM band devices.
monopole antenna is one of the elements of the dipole, giving rise to the term quarter-wave monopole. The other
element is usually replaced by a ground plane on the product’s circuit board or a metal enclosure on the device.
The ground plane or enclosure is called the antenna’s counterpoise. This reduces the size of the antenna by combining
it with something that is in the product anyway. It also makes the antenna much more dependent on the device’s construction.
This is discussed in the counterpoise section.
Connectorized vs. Permanent Mount
A connectorized antenna allows the end-user to easily remove the antenna, such as for transportation purposes or
to replace a damaged antenna. The FCC in the United States has rules for the type of antenna connector that can
be used, so it is important to make sure that the connection is compliant.
Permanent mount antennas are designed
to be installed by the OEM and not readily removed by the end-user. They may be either connected directly to the
WRT style devices) or soldered
on the device’s circuit board (MicroSplatch™
or JJB antenna).
The performance of a monopole antenna is critically dependent upon the associated
counterpoise. The counterpoise acts like one of the poles in a dipole antenna while the monopole antenna acts as
the other pole. Electrically this gives a complete dipole antenna. The counterpoise is usually a ground plane on
the circuit board. The location and size of the ground plane relative to the antenna significantly affects the performance
of the antenna in the final design. If the plane in the device is smaller than the one used to tune the antenna,
then the antenna’s center frequency will shift higher and the bandwidth will decrease.
When reading an antenna
data sheet it is important to consider the counterpoise size requirement relative to the space available in the
device. If there is not enough space for an adequate counterpoise, then the system range can decrease.
Describes the range of frequencies over which the antenna is optimally tuned. This should cover the frequency
band that will be used. If it does not, then the range of the device may not be consistent on all of the frequencies
used by the device.
Typically the where the VSWR is a minimum, or
where the antenna is designed to operate. Ideally this is in the center of the frequency band that is to be used.
The impedance of the antenna should match the radio that is used in the system.
Most RF radios and antennas are matched to 50-ohms as standard practice. If the antenna is not at the same impedance
as the radio then a mismatch occurs that introduces loss into the system. This reduces the overall system range.
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio is a measurement of how well an antenna is matched to a source impedance, typically
50-ohms. It’s calculated by measuring the voltage wave that is headed toward the load vs. the voltage wave that
is reflected back from the load. VSWR is usually displayed graphically vs. frequency. The lowest point on the graph
is the antenna’s operational center frequency. In most cases, this will be different than the designed center frequency
due to fabrication tolerances. The lower the VSWR, the more energy gets transferred into the antenna and the better
the range of the system. A 1:1 reading is ideal.
Gain and Radiation Pattern
an understanding of gain and radiation pattern will also help you analyze an antenna. The true measure of the effectiveness
of an antenna, no matter its given application, is determined by the gain and radiation pattern. The radiation pattern
is a graphical representation of how the energy radiates off of the antenna in all three dimensions. The gain is
a numerical measurement of the radiated energy, usually in decibels
radiation patterns are critical because they show how the antenna radiates energy into the environment. A perfect
antenna puts energy off in a sphere and is called an isotropic radiator. Real antennas do not have perfect patterns.
A normal dipole antenna has a pattern that looks like a doughnut. It is important for a designer to understand an
antenna’s radiation pattern and how it will affect the end product’s performance.
Gain can be a somewhat
confusing specification. Many engineers think of this term in reference to amplifiers, where gain is a measure of
how much an amplifier increases the input signal. However, the amplifier puts energy into the system, which makes
it an active device. An antenna is a passive device and cannot put energy into the system. Gain, when related to
antennas, refers to how an antenna focuses the energy that is put into it. A gain of energy in one direction means
that there is less energy in another direction. This has a direct impact on the range performance of the end device.
Application notes AN-00500
and AN-00501 go
into this in much more detail.
All said and done, when it comes to antenna data sheets, it’s important to know that not all antenna manufacturers
specify exactly the same way. This is especially true in the case of counterpoise size. If you have any questions
regarding data sheets, we’re here to help you out.
About Shawn Hogan
received his BS and MS degrees in Physics from the University of Washington in 1991 and 1996. He has worked at a
variety of companies in the sensor and measurement industry in both technical and management roles prior to joining
Linx in 2008. Shawn works as the assistant goat and chicken wrangler on his family farm when he’s not shepherding
new products through development.
About Linx Technologies
makes wireless simple by developing and manufacturing wireless products that are easy
for engineers of all skill
levels to use. The company’s RF modules, remote controls, antennas and connectors make it easy for engineers to
integrate wireless features without the hassle and expense of engineering RF functionality from scratch.
For customers who need help implementing Linx modules, Linx offers design services including board layout assistance,
programming, certification advice and packaging design. For more complex RF solutions, Apex Wireless, a division
of Linx Technologies, creates optimized designs with RF components and firmware selected for the customer’s application.
159 Ort Lane
Merlin, OR, US 97532
Phone: +1 800 736 6677
+1 541 471 6256 (outside U.S.)
Fax: + 1 541 471 6251
Posted October 10, 2013