"Squaring the circle"
may as yet be an unattainable goal for even the best mathematicians, but the November 2012 edition of
The Family Handyman magazine had a tip
for how to use a square (of the framing type) and two nails to draw a circle. This is what it said (emphasis
added by me):
Make a circle with a square
"Here's a tip for laying out small circles or parts of circles. Tack two nails to set the diameter
you want, then rotate a framing square against the nails while you hold a pencil in the corner of the
square. You might need to rub a little wax or some other lubricant on the bottom of the square so it
slides easily. Don't ask us why this process works; all we know
is that it does."
They're either very honest or they don't think the average reader would understand the explanation.
The Pythagorean theorem is the key, of course, for explaining the reason. For any right triangle:
b2 = c2,
where 'a' and 'b' are the lengths of the two perpendicular sides, and 'c' is the length of the hypotenuse.
The same equation also happens to be (not by coincidence) the equation for a circle of radius 'c,' with
the center at point (0,0). So, it stands to reason that if all of the parameters are met (three intersecting
straight sides with a right angle between two of them), then the locus of points of all permissible
value pairs (a,b) will result in a circle. It does not matter whether your value of 'c' represents a
radius or a diameter. The hypotenuse will always be the length between the two nails and sides 'a' and
'b' will always be the distance between each nail and the 90° vertex. QED
Out of curiosity, I dug out my father's old Audels Carpenters
and Builders Guide (printed in 1945) to see if it described the method and if it did, was there an explanation
offered. The author did show how to draw a circle with a framing square, and even described how to find
the diameter of a circle whose area is equal to the sum of the areas of two given circles (not sure
why that would be need by a carpenter). However, an explicit reason for why it all works out is never
Here is what is included in the manual:
FIG. 939.-Problem 1: To describe a semi-circle with given diameter.
Outer heel method:
Drive brads at points L, F, extremities of the given diameter. With pencil held at the outer heel
M, slide square around with its sides in contact with L, and F, then with the pencil held at M, describe
Inner heel method:
Obviously if the pencil be held at S, it will be better guided, than at M. In this method, the distance
L'F' should be taken to equal diameter, the inner edges of the square sliding on the tacks-the same
edges (in either case) that guide the pencil.
At the ends of the diameter LF (fig. 939) drive brads. Place the outer edges of the square against
the nails and hold a lead pencil at the outer heel M, any semi-circle can be described as indicated.
This is the outer heel method. but a better guide for the pencil is obtained by the inner heel method
also shown in the figure.
FIG. 940 - Problem 2: To find the center of a circle. At the points MS, and LF, where the sides of
the square cut the circle when placed in any position with heel in circumference, draw diameter and
then intersection will be the center of the circle. Why?
FIG. 941 - Problem 3: To describe a circle through three points not in a straight line. Let L, M,
and F, be the given points. Join these points with lines LM, and MF, bisecting them at 1 and 2. Apply
square with heel at 1 and 2 as shown and the intersection of perpendiculars thus obtained at S, will
be the center of circle which, with radius LS, may be described through LM and F.
To find the center of a circle.
Lay the square on the circle so that its outer heel lies in the circumference. Mark the intersections
of the body and tongue with the circumference. A line connecting these two points is a diameter and
by drawing another diameter (obtained in the same way) the intersection of the two diameters is the
center of the circle as shown in fig. 940.
To describe a circle through three points not in a straight line.
Joint points with straight lines; bisect these lines and at the points of bisection erect perpendiculars
with the square. The intersection of these perpendiculars is the center from which a circle may be described
through the three points as in fig. 941.
To find the diameter of a circle whose area is equal to the sum of the areas of two given
Let O, and H, be the given circles (drawn with diameters LR, and RF at right angles). Suppose diameter
of O, be 3 inches, and diameter of H, 4 inches. Then points L, F, at these distances from the heel of
the square will be 5 inches apart as conveniently measured with a two-foot rule as shown. This distance
LF, or 5 inches, is diameter of the required circle. Proof: LF2 = LR2 + RF2,
that is 52 = 32 + 42 or 25 = 9+16. (this is as close as they come to
explaining the phenomenon, but not really)
Posted December 25, 2012
A huge collection of my 'Factoids' can be accessed from my 'Kirt's Cogitations'
table of contents.
Topical Smorgasbord, another manifestation of Factoids,
are be found on these pages:
| 2 |
4 | 5
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
| 10 |
11 | 12 |
13 | 14
| 15 |
16 | 17 |
18 | 19
| 20 |
21 | 22
| 23 |
24 | 25 |
26 | 27
| 28 |
29 | 30 |
31 | 32
| 33 |
34 | 35 |
All pertain to topics that are related to the general engineering and science theme
of RF Cafe.