Microsoft Technical Support vs. the Psychic Friends Network™
Take a break from the
drudgery with some of these jokes, song parodies, anecdotes and assorted humor that has been collected from friends & from websites across
the Internet. This humor is light-hearted and sometimes slightly offensive to the easily-offended, so you are forewarned. I have taken care
to censor "humor" with reproductive function innuendo and hateful tirades, so it is all workplace-safe. I have also tried to warn
of any links that will result in audio clips so you can take appropriate precautions. Please send any potential candidates for this humor page
to the e-mail link above.
Humor #1 | Humor #2 | Humor #3
In the course of a recent Microsoft
Access programming project, we had three difficult technical problems where we decided to call a support hotline
for advice. This article compares the two support numbers we tried: Microsoft Technical Support and the Psychic
Friends Network. As a result of this research, we have come to the following conclusions: 1 ) that Microsoft
Technical Support and the Psychic Friends Network are about equal in their ability to provide technical assistance
for Microsoft products over the phone; 2 ) that the Psychic Friends Net work has a distinct edge over Microsoft in
the areas of courtesy, response time, and cost of support; but 3) that Microsoft has a generally better refund
policy if they fail to solve your problem.
In the paragraphs that follow, we will detail the support calls
we made and the responses we received from each support provider. We will follow this with a discussion of the
features provided by each support provider so that readers can do their own rankings of the two services.
Our research began when we called Microsoft regarding a bug that we had detected when executing queries which
pulled data from a Sybase Server into Microsoft Access. If we used the same Access database to query two databases
on the same server, we found that all of the queries aimed at the second database that we queried were sent to the
first database that we had queried. This problem existed no matter which database we queried first. Dan called
Microsoft's Technical Solutions Line, gave them $55, and was connected with an official Microsoft Access technical
support person. As Dan began to explain the problem, the support person interrupted him, and told him that since
it was clear that it was not just a problem with Access but with the two programs together, Microsoft would not
try to help us. They did, however, have a consultant referral service with which he would be glad to connect us.
Dan then asked if we could have our $55 refunded, since Microsoft was not going to try to answer to our question.
The tech support person responded by forwarding Dan to the person in charge of giving refunds. The person
officially in charge of giving refunds took Dan's credit card info again, after which Dan asked about the referral
service. It was too late, however - the refund folks could not reconnect Dan with the tech support guy he'd been
talking with, nor could he put Dan in touch with the referral service hotline. End of Call One.
Our second call came when Dan was creating some line graphs in Microsoft Access. Microsoft Access actually
uses a program called Microsoft Graph to create its graphs, and this program has a "feature" that makes the
automatic axis scale always start the scale at zero. If all of your data are between 9,800 and 10,000 and you get
a scale of 0 to 10,000, your data will appear as a flat line at the top of your graph-not a very interesting
chart. Since Dan was writing Visual Basic code to create the graphs, he wanted to be able to use Visual Basic code
to change the graph scaling, but he could not find anything in the help files that would tell him how to do this.
After working with Microsoft Graph for a while, Dan concluded that it probably didn't have the capability that he
needed, but he decided to call Microsoft just to make sure. Dan described his problem to the technical support
person, whom we'll call Microsoft Bob. Microsoft Bob said he'd never gotten a call about Microsoft Graph before.
He then left Dan on hold while he went to ask another support person how to use Microsoft Graph. Microsoft Bob
came back with the suggestion that Dan use the online help. Dan, however, had already used the online help, and
didn't feel that this was an appropriate answer for a $55 support call. Microsoft Bob didn't give up, though. He
consulted the help files and learned to change the graph scale by hand and then began looking for a way to do this
via code. After Microsoft Bob had spent about an hour on the phone with Dan learning how to use Microsoft Graph,
Dan asked for a refund since he had no more time to spend on the problem. Microsoft Bob refused the refund,
however. He said he wouldn't give up, and told Dan that he would call back the next week.
did call back the following week to admit failure. He could not help us. However, he couldn't give us a refund
either. Microsoft Bob's supervisor confirmed Microsoft Bob's position. While Microsoft Technical Support hadn't
solved our problem, they felt that a refund was inappropriate since Microsoft Technical Support had spent a lot of
time not solving our problem. Dan persisted, however, explaining that if Microsoft Bob actually knew the program,
he would have been able to give Dan a response much sooner. The supervisor made no guarantees, but he instructed
Dan to check his credit card bill at the end of the month. The supervisor explained that if Dan saw that the
charge was still there at the end of the month, then he would know that he hadn't gotten a refund. End of Call
Our third call to Microsoft involved using the standard file save dialog from within Microsoft Access
to get a file name and directory string from a user in order to save an exported file. The documentation didn't
make it clear how to do this using Visual Basic code within Microsoft Access, and Dan decided to call Microsoft to
ask if and how a programmer could do this. The technical support person he reached told him he was asking about a
pretty heavy programming task. He cheerily informed Dan that he'd called the wrong number and advised Dan to call
help for Visual Basic, not Access ($195 instead of $55 ). This technical support person was extraordinarily
helpful in getting Dan his refund. End of Call Three.
Stymied by our responses from Microsoft, we decided
to try another service provider, the Psychic Friends Network. There are several noticeable differences between
Microsoft and the Psychic Friends Network. Microsoft charges a flat rate per "solution," which is a single problem
and can be handled in multiple phone calls. As described above, Microsoft may or may not issue a refund of their
fee if they fail to provide a solution for your problem. The Psychic Friends Network charges a per minute fee.
They do not offer a refund if they cannot solve your problem. However, unlike Microsoft, they will not charge you
extra if they provide more than one solution per call.
We decided to test the Psychic Friends Network by
asking them the same questions that we had asked Microsoft Technical Support. We called them and were quickly
connected with Ray, who was very courteous and helpful. Like Microsoft Bob, Ray quickly informed us that he wasn't
fully up to date on the programs that we were working with, but he was willing to help us anyway. We started off
with our first problem : making a connection from Microsoft Access to two different Sybase Servers. Ray worked
hard on this problem for us. He sensed that there was a problem with something connecting, that something wasn't
being fulfilled either in a sexual, spiritual or emotional way. Ray also identified that there was some sort of
physical failure going on that was causing the problem." Do you mean that there's some sort of bug?" we asked. Ray
denied that he knew about any sort of bug in the software. "Are you sure there's not a bug?" we asked. Ray
insisted that he did not know of any bug in the software, although he left open the possibility that there could
be some bug in the software that he did not know about. All in all, Ray did not do much to distinguish himself
from Microsoft Technical Support. He wasn't able to solve our problem for us, and he wasn't able to confirm or
deny that a bug in Microsoft Access was causing the problem. We then asked Ray our question about using Visual
Basic to set the axes of a chart. Ray thought hard about this one. Once again he had the sense that something just
wasn't connecting, that there was some sort of physical failure that was causing our problem. "Could it be that
it's your computer that's the problem?" he asked. "Is this something that happens just on your computer, or have
you had the same problem when you've tried to do the same thing on other computers?" We assured Ray that we had
the same problem on other computers, then asked again, "This physical failure that you're talking about, do you
mean that there's some sort of bug?" Once again he assured us that there wasn't a bug, but that he didn't know how
to solve our problem. "I sense there's some sort of sickness here, and you're just going to have to sweat it out.
If you'd like, you can call back tomorrow. We have a couple of guys here, Steve and Paul, and they 're much better
with computer stuff than I am." To conclude our research, we asked Ray about our problem with the standard file
dialog box." It's the same thing as the last one," he told us. "There's some sort of sickness here, and you're
just going to have to sweat it out. There is a solution, though, and you're just going to have to work at it until
you get it."
Conclusions In terms of technical expertise, we found that a Microsoft technician using
Knowledge Base was about as helpful as a Psychic Friends reader using Tarot Cards. All in all, however, the
Psychic Friends Net work proved to be a much friendlier organization than Microsoft Technical Support. While
neither group was actually able to answer any of our technical questions, the Psychic Friends Network was much
faster than Microsoft and much more courteous. Which organization is more affordable is open to question. If
Microsoft does refund all three "solutions" fees, then they will be the far more affordable solution provider,
having charged us no money for having given us no assistance. However, if Microsoft does not refund the fees for
our call regarding Microsoft Graph, then they will have charged us more than 120% of what the Psychic Friends
Network charged, but without providing the same fast and courteous service that Psychic Friends provided.
Microsoft Tech Support (800) 939-5700
The Psychic Friends Network (900)-407-6611
out there on the Web (in many places) - original owner let me know to give credit
Copyright: 1996 - 2024
BSEE - KB3UON
RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling
2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas
and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer.
The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available
in the form of WYSIWYG
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text
used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.
My Hobby Website: AirplanesAndRockets.com