Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes USAF radar shop Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Engineering Magazines Engineering magazine articles Engineering software Engineering smorgasbord RF Cafe Archives RF Cascade Workbook 2018 RF Stencils for Visio RF & EE Shapes for Word Advertising RF Cafe Homepage Sudoku puzzles Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!
RF Stencils for Visio v3.1 by RF Cafe

Begging the Question: BTQ Abuse

Begging the Question - RF CafeWe all have pet peeves, which begs the question, "What is yours?" One of my pet peeves is the nearly universal misuse of the phrase "begs the question." As presented in the first sentence, the usage is utterly incorrect. To "beg the question" does not mean a question is begging to be asked. Rather, it describes the occasion of a self-proving statement, a logical fallacy or circular reasoning. Grammarians refer to the transgression as "BTQ Abuse." Supposedly, the original derivation is from the Latin term "petitio principii," meaning to petition the principle, or to challenge the assertion of a statement. For example, if I say, "ABC Corporation's receivers are superior to XYZ Corporation's inferior receivers," I have begged the question, "Why are ABC Corporation's receivers superior to XYZ Corporation's receivers?," or, conversely, "Why are XYZ Corporation's receivers inferior to ABC Corporation's receivers?" What brings this issue to mind is that I just read an article in Discover magazine where an accomplished astrophysicist erroneously used the term. Eventually, constant misuse of a word or phrase causes it to be given a place in modern lexicons akin to how panhandlers are eventually permitted to populate highway off-ramps and intersections because it's easier to allow them than to eradicate them. Are you a BTQ Abuser?

For the record, another pet peeve of mine is the fallacious statement, "I could care less." That is another logical fallacy because what is really meant is, "I couldn't care less." If you "could care less," then that means you still care at least a little about the subject when what you really mean is you care as little you possibly can about the subject already - it is not possible for you to care less than you already do. A Ph.D.-degreed scientist I listen to regularly on the radio makes the mistake frequently during arguements.

I will be glad to post your grammatical pet peeves here if you send them to me - even if (especially if) they are mistakes I commit (other than an admitted continual rash of typos).





Posted  January 14, 2014
Triad RF Systems Rohde & Schwarz RTM3000 & RTA4000 Oscilloscopes - RF Cafe
Rohde & Schwarz USA (Signal Generator Pocket Guide 1) - RF Cafe
About RF Cafe
Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster
Copyright: 1996 - 2018
Webmaster:
    Kirt Blattenberger,
    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:  AirplanesAndRockets.com

spacer