Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014     Visit RF Cafe on
      Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!          Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

Begging the Question: BTQ Abuse

Begging the Question - RF CafeWe all have pet peeves, which begs the question, "What is yours?" One of my pet peeves is the nearly universal misuse of the phrase "begs the question." As presented in the first sentence, the usage is utterly incorrect. To "beg the question" does not mean a question is begging to be asked. Rather, it describes the occasion of a self-proving statement, a logical fallacy or circular reasoning. Grammarians refer to the transgression as "BTQ Abuse." Supposedly, the original derivation is from the Latin term "petitio principii," meaning to petition the principle, or to challenge the assertion of a statement. For example, if I say, "ABC Corporation's receivers are superior to XYZ Corporation's inferior receivers," I have begged the question, "Why are ABC Corporation's receivers superior to XYZ Corporation's receivers?," or, conversely, "Why are XYZ Corporation's receivers inferior to ABC Corporation's receivers?" What brings this issue to mind is that I just read an article in Discover magazine where an accomplished astrophysicist erroneously used the term. Eventually, constant misuse of a word or phrase causes it to be given a place in modern lexicons akin to how panhandlers are eventually permitted to populate highway off-ramps and intersections because it's easier to allow them than to eradicate them. Are you a BTQ Abuser?

For the record, another pet peeve of mine is the fallacious statement, "I could care less." That is another logical fallacy because what is really meant is, "I couldn't care less." If you "could care less," then that means you still care at least a little about the subject when what you really mean is you care as little you possibly can about the subject already - it is not possible for you to care less than you already do. A Ph.D.-degreed scientist I listen to regularly on the radio makes the mistake frequently during arguements.

I will be glad to post your grammatical pet peeves here if you send them to me - even if (especially if) they are mistakes I commit (other than an admitted continual rash of typos).





Posted  January 14, 2014
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger
    KB3UON

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website