RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook 2005 - RF Cafe
RF Cascade Workbook

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel
RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2016
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes RF Cascade Workbook RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Chart of Scientific Paper Collaboration Between Countries

Chart of Scientific Paper Collaboration Between Countries - RF CafeThe old adage about a picture being worth a thousand words is validated often with charts and graphs made for science, engineering, and finance. This chart illustrates levels of collaboration between 25 countries on scientific papers published in 2011 in a select group of journals. Author John Sexton uses color and line width to indicate origin and volume between countries. Circumferential length (pie slice) is relative volume overall. He also includes a similar chart showing internal collaboration within the 10 countries with the highest scientific paper output. Per Mr. Sexton, in 1996 about 25% of scientific articles were authored by people in two or more countries; today it is 35%. Non-commercial "Big Science" projects like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, with multinational funding, contribute largely to the increase. Aptly pointed out is how global access to and distribution of information has vastly accelerated the rate of invention and productivity. Sovereignty is still necessary to safeguard defense and financial competitiveness, but it should not restrict collaboration between willing participants otherwise. Even self-identified "no borders" people tend to safeguard their own interests by constructing social, political, and economic boundaries around their work. That goes for collaborators as well as for individual researchers. When it comes to themselves, being an "idea capitalist," as Sexton puts it, is OK, but everybody else should openly share.

Another statistic mentioned is that the United States' dominance in patents issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) ended in 2008. As manufacturing and research continues to move offshore, so does the origin of invention. A country's status in the world is based on a lot of things, among the top of which is scientific contribution. Money follows invention, as is evidenced by venture capital on a corporate scale and the relatively new crowdsourcing phenomenom on a personal scale. America's slice of the pie is contracting, much to the delight of many people, including, unfortunately, many of our own citizens. Our schools are droppping in global rankings, productivity levels are decreasing, and our dollar is being devalued by unfettered monitization (electronic and physical printing). Aforementioned politicians and uninvested layment seem bent through both malice and ignorance on knocking the U.S. off its pedestal. We're teetering now; will we continue to sleep and be toppled, or will we finally wake up and restore the once-great leadership role we once had?

BTW, there is also a good article titled, "Why Germany Still Makes Things" worth reading.

Unfortunately, a subscription is needed to read the entire article, but you can get a copy from your local library. Of course you can always subscribe to Scientific American; I look forward to my copy each month. If you read a couple of the comments posted by readers, some lament the loss of depth of the articles compared to when they first started reading decades ago. The irony is that obviously their depth of knowledge has increased, not necessarily that the magazine's content has decreased. That is the case with me as well since when I began reading Scientific American back in the late 1970s, the concept of quarks, quantum mechanics, astrophysics, genetics, biology, psychology, and many other realms of study was completely new and I was mesmerized by the data begin presented. Today, I am no expert in any of the fields but I do find some of the material does not have quite the "wow" factor as before. However, there is always something new and worth reading.




Posted  9/21/2012