Custom Search

More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.

Greetings: There is so much good stuff on RF Cafe that there is no way to list or link to all of it here. Please use the Search box or the Site Map to find what you want - there is a good chance I have it. Thanks!

•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<
Job Board
About RF Cafe™
Copyright 1999-2015

Output power measurement using network analyzer - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

 Post subject: Output power measurement using network analyzer
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:48 pm 

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:40 pm
Posts: 11

i new to using network analyzer and doing microwave/RF measurements. i am using Agilent 8364B network analyzer. i did full 2-port caliberation for power sweep and got s21 vs. Pin curve. now, i wanted to get Pout vs. Pin curve but the one i got didn't correspond to s21 data.

i did an unratioed trace on receiver B (in side the VNA port 2) to see the absolute output power on receiver B but instead of showing a curve that is Pin+s21=Pout it shows me in fact a loss of 10 dB, which doesn't make sense. i did the full two-port caliberation so i think caliberation shouldn't be the issue. do i need to do a receiver caliberation for B. is that required, though? would i see this bad a Pout curve if I don't do receiver calibeartion? any help or feedback will be nice. thanks

 Post subject:
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:40 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:53 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Earth
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, but if I do I think the relative numbers should match. Meaning you the compression levels for input power should be the same for both results. I would stick with the one with S21 since the calibration is fully accounted for.

For the measurement of "raw" power into PortB, since the measurement is unratioed (as you mentioned) the levels have to be checked for. The VNA has internal attenuators (plus the couplers) that are automatically accounted for when you use the VNA "normally". Check the settings and also check the actual output port power (PortA) with a Spectrum Analyzer.

But I think you already found this out:

 Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:13 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:10 pm
Posts: 1
You will need to calibrate the "B" receiver in order to see accurate power levels. What you are trying to accomplish can be done. Set up a B channel measurement. Perform a source power calibration on port 1, so the output power of port 1 is calibrated over your desired frequency range. Then make a through connection between ports 1 and 2, and perform a receiver cal (which is essentially a normalization). Now the values on the B receiver are accurate. When you connect your amp, the B will show you the output power in dBm.

Posted  11/12/2012

Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger… single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB: My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website