Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014
Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

How to compare the PIM Level from different test freq? - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

 Post subject: How to compare the PIM Level from different test freq?
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:33 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:22 pm
Posts: 2
I got a question about PIM test result.
PIM test is done by using two tones test. However, the frequency of the two tones are not standardized.
Let's say we have two sets of test results from two different companies and they are using different frequency setting (one for 869 MHz & 891 MHz, the other for 1100MHz & 1900 MHz). Their results have the same PIM level.

Which one will be better? and Why?

* I am assuming the one with higher freq tones will be better, because of the skin-effect, but I have a hard time to find any document to approve the relationship between testing frequency, skin-effect, and PIM level.

 Post subject:
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 4:57 pm 

PIM means passive intermodulation, and it refers to in-band spurious tones, so you should perform the test with the tones on the frequencies on which your device normally works... if your device works form 800 to 900MHz, you should perform the test with the one with the tones inn 869 MHz & 891 MHz...
In the case that your device works from, let´s say: 600 to 2000MHz, then both measurements are ok, none of them is more characteristic than the other one, and if you need to give a product specification... provide both, explaining each test conditions.

Hope to be helpful

 Post subject:
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:13 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:22 pm
Posts: 2
Thanks, FSomma

Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website