Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all
the responses to the original posts.
Post subject: Capturing FM waveform on digital oscilloscope
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 12:56 pm
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006
There was an oscilloscope article written by Steven
B. Warntjes about sustained sample rate in digital
oscilloscopes. I wanted to get a verification from
the experienced users on this group. Let's say I
have an oscilloscope with 25000 sample memory depth
and a real time sampling of 1 gigaSamples / sec
with 200 MHz bandwidth (-3dB).
If I had
an FM carrier at 100 MHz with a 1000 Hz (1 mS period)
test signal modulating it, does that mean that a
digital oscilloscope with the specs above will not
be able to capture the waveform properly?
I was thinking that if the capture window (in
seconds unit) is equal to the memory depth (in samples
unit) divided by the sample rate (in samples / sec
unit), then the maximum capture window that I can
use and still maintain the rated sampling rate would
be 25 uS (micro-seconds).
So that means
that if my carrier signal is deviating between 100MHz
+/- 1kHz, then my capture window would at least
have to be 1ms/div to capture the deviation properly
(?). With a capture window of 1ms/div, my sample
rate would decrease to 25 mega-samples/sec, which
is not enough to sample the 100MHz carrier frequency.
Is that right?
I know that I can just
use a spectrum analyzer, but I wanted to capture
the waveform and duplicate the time-domain plot
of frequency modulation (amplitude vs. time) that
I've seen in the books.