|
| |
| |
| | Cable Loss Measurement - RF Cafe Forums |
Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
Facebook page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all
the responses to the original posts.
| robh001 | Post subject: Cable Loss Measurement Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:31 am |
| | | | Lieutenant |  |
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:25 am
Posts: 2 | Hi,
If I wanted to find the attenuation of a cable at 1.6Ghz how would I go about this. What equipment would I need. Is there a realtively inexpensive way to do this.
Thanks for any help,
Rob
|
| | | |  |
| IR | Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:03 pm |
| | | | Site Admin |  |
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 406
Location: Germany | Hello robh001,
You will need eith 1 of the following setups:
1. Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) - more expensive.
You should calibrate the VNA - insertion loss calibration would be enough (Through standard only) at 1.6GHz. Following that, connect the measured cable between the VNA's ports and measure S21. The result is the insertion loss of the cable.
2. A Signal generator and power meter - less expensive.
Calibrate the power meter. Se the frequency of the power meter to 1.6GHz, Then connect the measured cable on one side to the signal generator and on the other side to the power meter. Set the signal generator for frequency of 1.6GHz and output power of 0dBm and read the power, the result is the insertion loss (In absolute value).
|
| | | | |
| robh001 | Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:35 am |
| | | | Lieutenant | |
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:25 am
Posts: 2 | Thanks IR,
The second way sounds more cost effective, if I was to get a signal generator to go to 1Ghz, how could I check the loss at 1.6Ghz,
is there a way of check a few different values, and then apply to a formula?
Thanks again,
Rob
|
| | | | |
| nubbage | Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:20 pm |
| | | | General |  |
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 268
Location: London UK | Hi Rob
Sure: plot the loss from about 800MHz to 1GHz in 50MHz intervals, then draw a graph leaving enough space at the right-hand side to extend the curve to 1.6GHz.
Then extrapolate the values out to 1.6GHz. Cables generally have a smooth well-behaved curve so this approach is quite accurate. However, it becomes much less accurate as you approach the frequency where the first cylindrical waveguide mode can form.
I have a formula for cable loss somewhere. I will see if I can dig it out.
|
|
Posted 11/12/2012
| |
|
|
|
Kirt
