Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all
the responses to the original posts.
Post subject: rejection of WLNA signal at input of colocated Wimax receive
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:01 pm
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 am
I am designing a transceiver where WLAN and WIMAX radios are colocated (on the same PCB).
consider an usage scenariuo when the WLAN (2.45 GHz) systems is transmitting and the WiMAX (2.51 GHz) is receiving. due to finite isolation between the antennas (<15 dB) of WLAN and Wimax, the WLAN signal will either saturate the WIMAX LNA or may produce some intermodulation product by mixing with other signals.
In the standard the minimum rejection requirements of WLAN signal at WIMAX receiver input is not specified.
I calculated that -40 dBm of any interferer signal would be desired to keep all IMD products at LNA input(IIP3=3) below the Noise Floor.
From this I found out the rejection required for WLAN signal. For example it the receiver antenan see a maximum of 5 dBm WLAN signal then the filter before LNA should attenuate the signal to -40 dBm so that any IMD generated by this signal is less than Noise floor.
However it seems that such filters are extremly difficult to realize.
I was wondering if this is the correct approach of finding the filter rejection requirements.
I would be grateful if anyone can share their views on this.
Design Engineer- RF
Post subject: Re: rejection of WLNA signal at input of colocated Wimax receive
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:36 am
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Location: London UK
There are two separate issues here:
1) mutual interference that might be filtered
2) unacceptable high saturation of the non-linear devices
Regarding (1) I am not familiar with the relative relationship between mutual interferers in these particular systems, but in general with digital modulation, it is possible to operate even co-channel with interferers that are only -10dBc. Thus typically one obtains a Bit Error rate of say 1 in 10^-8 for a carrier to noise ratio of 10dB. This arises mainly because the modulation is quasi-synchronous, and the interferer signal clock will be out of phase coherence and thus appear as just noise.
Regarding (2) the resulting non-linearity products might be capable of being out-filtered using an elliptic function filter with the rapid roll-off side of the BPF placed between the two carriers.
At bottom, life is all about
Sucking in and blowing out.