Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeView the YouTube RF Cafe Intro VideoKirt Blattenberger ... single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.

Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB:
My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets:
My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom:
My daughter Sally's horse riding website

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
RF Cafe header

Impact of Noise Figure on Phase Noise - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Please visit the new and improved RF Cafe Forums that were created in September of 2015. Unlike with the old forums where users registered individually, the new forums use a common User Name and Password so anyone can post without needing to create an account. Please find the current User Name and Password on the RF Cafe homepage. Thanks for your participation.

Below are all of the old forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

 Post subject: Impact of Noise Figure on Phase Noise
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:03 pm 
Lets say you have a signal at a known frequency with a known amount of phase noise, and you pass the signal through a fixed attenuator, is there a way to calculate/estimate what impact the attenuation has on the phase noise of the output signal?


 
  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:30 am 
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 653
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings crg:

My guess is that the effect of the attenuator on phase noise would be similar to the intended signal and noise. You would need to perform a cascade analysis for the path where the phase noise is first injected and treat that component of the total signal as a separate signal that is summed with the intended signal.

The discrete phase noise component would be attenuated by an amount equal to the total Gain in the path from the phase noise injection point and the continuous phase noise component would be subject to the total Gain and Noise Figure.

If the phase noise is present on the signal at the system input, then it is treated to the same effects as the rest of the intended signal and noise.

If it is injected in an LO at a mixer, then the phase noise component is determined by a separate cascade comprised by the path the LO signal takes.

In the last case, for a real system the summation of the two components [(intended signal + noise] + [LO + phase noise)] would be a point-by-point vector addition, so a simple scalar summing could produce erroneous results.

Any comments by others?

_________________
- Kirt Blattenberger :smt024
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster




Posted  11/12/2012

Newest Posts on RF Cafe Forums

Sign-in as GUEST:  User=guest1 | Pwd=micro1


Copyright 1996 - 2016
Webmaster:  Kirt Blattenberger, BSEE - KB3UON

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.