•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

#### RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

#### Your RF CafeProgenitor & Webmaster

Kirt Blattenberger
BSEE
KB3UON
EIEIO

Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB:

Airplanes and Rockets:
My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom:
My daughter Sally's horse riding website

 Relativity anyone? - RF Cafe Forums
 The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Below are all of the old forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts. -- Amateur Radio-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor -- Antennas-- CAE, CAD, & Software-- Circuits & Components -- Employment & Interviews -- Miscellany-- Swap Shop-- Systems-- Test & Measurement-- Webmaster

 Post subject: Relativity anyone? Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:53 pm
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
If speeds in space one day get up to a significant fraction of the speed of light, will the usual Doppler radar solution: fractional frequency shift = twice the relative speed (expressed as a fraction of the speed of light) between the radar and the target still hold? Stated differently: is (Delta lambda)/lambda = 2v/c still valid?

 Post subject: How about twin paradox? Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:49 am
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
Since there was no response to the Doppler question, how about the twin paradox? Do you believe the story that if one twin sets out on a long, very fast return trip, he/she will end up younger than the stay-home twin?

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:14 am

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 451
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings Jorrie:

It is not really a question of belief. Many experiments have been carried out using atomic clocks in aircraft, as wellas in space vehicles, that confirms absolutely the tenets of general relativity. As an example, the effects of both lower gravitation and relative speed are corrected for in the GPS system. A Google Search on the topic will yield a plethora of information on the topic.

Thanks for writing.

_________________
- Kirt Blattenberger
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster

 Post subject: Converted relativist Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:11 am
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
Hi Kirt,

Firstly, thanks for a great site and forum! Secondly, thanks for replying.

I'm actually a "converted relativist" and made the statement in my previous post only to try and extract some reaction! I agree with all that you said.

By the way, any ideas on my Doppler radar question? (I know engineers don't need relativity, but it's still intriguing!)

Jorrie

 Post subject: Relativity Anyone? Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:54 am
 General

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 236
Location: London UK
I've been idly sucking my thumb over the weekend thinking of this one, without much result.
One of the thoughts that wafted my way was: if we observe from earth using a spectrometer the collision betwixt two very large objects, super-suns (as found in colliding galaxies), occurring along our line of vision, one will be receding from us and have a red shift corresponding to say 60% of the VOL, and the other approaching it and us with a blue shift corresponding to 60% of the VOL.

Does that mean the relative velocity between them is 120% of the VOL?
If not, why not?

 Post subject: Addition of velocities Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:17 am
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
Relativistic velocities measured in the same inertial frame adds up as v = (v1/c+v2/c)/(1+v1v2/c^2). This means that if an observer riding with your "super-sun" A measures the velocity of "super-sun" B, the result will be 1.2c/1.36 = 0.882c. The reasoning behind the "relativistic addition of velocities" equation is rather complex and requires some knowledge of relativity.

Hope it helps.
Jorrie

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:16 pm

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 451
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings Jorrie:

I thought you might be tweaking us a little in order to provoke a discussion.

The subject of relativistic speed addition brings to mind the old (well, it can't be too old) Einsteinian Commandment, "Thou shalt not add thine own speed directly to the speed of thine fellow traveler."

Since the relativistic addition of velocities is given by

V = v1+v2/sqrt (1+ (v1·v2/c²)),

it can be seen that when v1 and/or v2 are very small compared to c, the equation reduces to the Newtonian form of

V= v1 + v2 QED (always thought that QED thing looked scholarly).

_________________
- Kirt Blattenberger
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster

 Post subject: Re: Addition of velocities Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 2:32 am
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
Hi Kirt, a very nice Einstein Commandment!

To stick to it diligently, however, requires some care with the formula.

The equation that you gave [V = v1+v2/sqrt (1+ (v1·v2/c²))] 'sins' heavily. The one that I gave [v = (v1/c+v2/c)/(1+v1v2/c^2)] 'sins' lightly, but sin is sin!

Can anybody spot the two problems? Hint: relativistic addition of velocities cannot result in a velocity greater than c... And watch those units of measure!

Jorrie

 Post subject: Tying Loose Ends Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:23 pm
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
To guard against loose ends in threads, I'm stitching this one up - the correct relativistic addition of velocities is:

v = (v1+v2)/(1+v1.v2/c^2),

where v, v1, v2 and c are in conventional SI units of m/s. The 'sin' in my original formula was units of measure. The r.h.s. implied that v1 and v2 were SI velocites, while the left hand implied velocity as a fraction of c, due to the lack of the division by c (not intended as a test, but a typo, I must confess).

You can read more on this and other special relativity formulae in a download from my website http://www.einsteins-theory-of-relativi ... ement.html

Jorrie

 Post subject: Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:34 pm

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 451
Location: Erie, PA
Greetings Jorrie:

I took the occasion of you posting your great Relativity 4 Engineers website URL to give you a little extra promotion by listing your site in the Recent Additions list on the RF Cafe homepage.

I have always had a big interest in relativity and used to do quite a bit of reading on it back when I had more time (that would be about 20 years ago). My own attempt at a Relativity page is pretty pathetic, but it will be vastly improved as I go about updating material.

_________________
- Kirt Blattenberger
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster

 Post subject: Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:59 am
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
Hi Kirt

Thanks for the publicity. I was unsure on the issue of free 'advertising'. Relativity 4 Engineers contains a lot of free content and, as you perhaps spotted, no advertising other than promoting the ebook-to-be, which will be sold from another, more commercial website.

Keep up the good work! I will post interesting relativity and cosmology tidbits from time to time.

Regards, Jorrie

 Post subject: Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:02 am
 Captain

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: 25.9S 28.1E
 Hi Kirt(Some hiccup on my side caused a double post!)Regards, Jorrie

Posted  11/12/2012