Custom Search
Over 10000 Pages Indexed
Your Host
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt

... single-
what an
engineering website
should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB):
My USAF radar shop

Hobby & Fun

Airplanes and Rockets:
My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom:
My daughter Sally's horse
riding business website -
lots of info

•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

Job Board

About RF Cafe©

RF Cafe E-Mail

Poll: Is a Degree Necessary to Be Called an Engineer? - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

Is a Degree Necessary to Be Called an Engineer?
Yes, always    19%  [ 37 ]
Yes, with few exceptions    40%  [ 77 ]
No, it is just a title    39%  [ 74 ]
I have no opinion    2%  [ 3 ]

Total votes : 191

 Post subject: Is a Degree Necessary to Be Called an Engineer?
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:23 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm
Posts: 451
Location: Erie, PA

Some people are of the opinion that in order to called an "Engineer," it is necessary to have earned the proper engineering degree - the professional connotation of the position demands so. Others believe it is just a title that can be accorded to any competent person. Please take a couple minutes to read through my "Kirt's Cogitations" article and then respond to this poll question. Or, skip the article and respond to the poll.

Thanks for your participation.

- Kirt Blattenberger :smt024
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster

 Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:28 pm 

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:18 pm
Posts: 6
Thanks for the excellent article. I have recently worked with two "engineers", both of whom I thought were very good at what they do only to be surprised to find out that one had a degree in accounting and the other had no degree at all. These two gentlemen, however, had many years of experience.

Something that bothers me more, though, is the proliferation of professions these days that call themselves engineers; i.e. "sanitation engineer" (garbage man), and "recording engineer" among others. It bothers me that people attach "engineer" to their job when it has nothing to do with engineering, at least not in the scientific sense.

So, with that being said, my vote was "Yes, with few exceptions" because I think the title of "engineer" should be earned through engineering course work, but I recognize that there are exceptions where experience is a good (or better) substitute.

Thanks for maintaining such an informative site and keep up the great work.

 Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:42 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:02 pm
Posts: 8
I am a non degreed engineer. I have been one for 30 years. I managed to make the transition because I was doing significant RF design well and without close supervision. Since then I branched into RFIC design and RF systems design. I have had a interesting carrier.

To be honest I would not have had a chance if most engineers were not under employed. That was 30 years ago. Now it's much worse.

 Post subject:
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:01 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:13 am
Posts: 11
I agree with Tony that today's environment does not leave much room for an "engineer" without a degree and probably rightly so. Maybe I'm biased because I went to the trouble to earn an MSEE in microwave engineering, but I think the title imples the person took the time, trouble and expense to earn the degree and suffered through the same rigorous bit of training that I went through. It's a rite of passage and calling just anyone and "engineer" would be a disservice to those of us who did earn a degree. Those who haven't can claim to know what it's like, but they really cannot. Sorry if this seems snobbish, but it's merely protecting the integrity of an institution.


 Post subject:
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:22 pm 

Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Posts: 7
Location: Overland Park, KS
I believe in some US sates you can't legally call yourself an engineer unless you hold a PE license.

 Post subject: Re: Is a Degree Necessary to Be Called an Engineer?
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 4
Location: Ontario, Canada
Yes, with a few exceptions. I was a radar tech in
the airforce, then went back to school but did not
finish for monetary reasons. I wrote the engineering
acceptance exams for my Province of Ontario,
Canada, just the same as if I had been an immigrant
with a degree from another country.

Best regards,

/Clay (first post)

Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel