Thank you for visiting RF Cafe! Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Slope of IIP3 graph - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement

Post subject: slope of IIP3 graph Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:59 am
hi to all,
i am getting a strange resu;t, let me desicribe that first.
When I am plotting I and III harmonics of a Common Source Amplifier (for IIP3 ) , I am getting slope of '3' of III harmonic curve , but when I cascade it with another Common Source Amplifeir , I get slope of less then '3' !!!

Isn't it strange ???

Please help me . . . . .

I have second doubt that if it is correct that slope will decrease then everyone must use cascading as it increases IIP3 point !

Please help,
please . .. . . .. . .. . .


Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:38 pm
your probablycompressing the second amplifier.. Back off on the input power.


Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:52 pm
really could not understand first reply


Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:15 pm

Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Hello Guest,

IP3 is measured under 'small signal' conditions.

To be more specific according to the IEEE: the IMR3 (3rd order Intermodulation Ratio), which is the difference between the 1st order signal to the 3rd order (in dB) should be greater than 20dBc.

For each 1dB increment in the fundamental signal (1st order) the IM3 product is increased in 3dB.

When you cascade 2 amplifiers and you want to measure the cascaded IP3, you should check that both amplifiers are working in small signal region and far enough from P1dB. If the slope is no more 3:1, that means that one of the amplifiers is working in non-linear region i.e. close to compression. The meaning of backing off is to reduce the input power to the amplifier and by that to decrease the output power and backing it off from compression. Try to reduce the input power to the first amplifier and measure the IP3 again.

Good luck!

Best regards,

- IR


Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:47 am
really very very impressed by IR's answer.
Thanks a lot ,

Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Kirt Blattenberger,

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !