Formulas & Data:
- Electronics
- Mathematics
- Physics
- RF & Microwaves

Parts Vendors:
- all hand-selected

- Amateur Radio
- Vintage Articles:
- Electronics World
- Popular Electronics
- Radio & TV News
- Radio Craft
- Short Wave Craft
- Wireless World

- Events Calendar
RF Cafe Homepage
Copyright 1999-2015   •−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •   "RF Cafe" in Morse Code  >> Listen to It <<
- EW & Radar Handbook
- Quizzes       - Software
- App Notes
- Calculators
- Advertise on RF Cafe
- About RF Cafe™
- RF Cafe Shirts & Mugs
- RF Cafe Archives
RF Cafe Book Contest
- RF Cafe on Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
- Tech Humor
- Forums Archive
- Job Board
- Donate to RF Cafe
- Kirt's Cogitations
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
Greetings: There is so much good stuff on RF Cafe that there is no way to list or link to all of it here. Please use the Search box or the Site Map to find what you want - there is a good chance I have it. Thanks!

slope of IIP3 graph - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

Post subject: slope of IIP3 graph Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:59 am
hi to all,
i am getting a strange resu;t, let me desicribe that first.
When I am plotting I and III harmonics of a Common Source Amplifier (for IIP3 ) , I am getting slope of '3' of III harmonic curve , but when I cascade it with another Common Source Amplifeir , I get slope of less then '3' !!!

Isn't it strange ???

Please help me . . . . .

I have second doubt that if it is correct that slope will decrease then everyone must use cascading as it increases IIP3 point !

Please help,
please . .. . . .. . .. . .


Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:38 pm
your probablycompressing the second amplifier.. Back off on the input power.


Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:52 pm
really could not understand first reply


Post subject: Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:15 pm

Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Hello Guest,

IP3 is measured under 'small signal' conditions.

To be more specific according to the IEEE: the IMR3 (3rd order Intermodulation Ratio), which is the difference between the 1st order signal to the 3rd order (in dB) should be greater than 20dBc.

For each 1dB increment in the fundamental signal (1st order) the IM3 product is increased in 3dB.

When you cascade 2 amplifiers and you want to measure the cascaded IP3, you should check that both amplifiers are working in small signal region and far enough from P1dB. If the slope is no more 3:1, that means that one of the amplifiers is working in non-linear region i.e. close to compression. The meaning of backing off is to reduce the input power to the amplifier and by that to decrease the output power and backing it off from compression. Try to reduce the input power to the first amplifier and measure the IP3 again.

Good luck!

Best regards,

- IR


Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:47 am
really very very impressed by IR's answer.
Thanks a lot ,

Posted  11/12/2012

Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger… single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB: My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website