Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all
the responses to the original posts.
Post subject: Question: difference between RFIC and RF/Microwave circuits Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006
What is the difference between RFIC and just plain RF/Microwave circuits? I know one is integrated
circuit and one is just more traditional using surface mount(microstrip) etc. But my main question is in what
applications do you need RFICs and when do you design just RF circuits.
Post subject: RFPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:07 pm
RFIC -- active and passive devices integrated on
chip -- hence the name integrated circuit.
RF/Microwave -- USUALLY discrete using transmission lines,
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:34 am
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 2:42 am
Location: Czech Rep.
I feel no difference.
Post subject: Difference between RFIC and Microwave CircuitsPosted: Thu Feb 23,
2006 8:15 am
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Location: London UK
Obviously the size, but that comes about because of the high dielectric constant used for RFICs. It means a
wavelength in the material is physically very short, so elements that should resonate can be tightly packed
together in an RFIC. The dielectric constant for typical microwave substrates is 2.2 compared with 10 or 20 for
The electric fields are physically constrained by high e materials in RFICs, so circuit element
interaction is less of a problem, compared with Microwave stripline circuits, in which layout is crucial to