Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Coupled Microstrip Lines - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


greggd
Post subject: coupled microstrip lines
Unread postPosted: Mon May 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 1:56 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Does anyone have any tricks for optimizing coupled microstrip lines for differential mode (Zodd=50ohms, Zeven=100ohms)? I find that the closed form models in ADS and AWR do not match what is produced in Sonnet or Momentum.

Thanks for any help,

-Gregg


Top
Profile

Guest
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Tue May 25, 2004 9:03 am

Sonnet and Momentum are "2.5D" simulators, the conductors must be zero thickness. Are you accounting for this? Momentum lets you define conductor thickness only for signal attenuation calculations not for geometric impact on electrical performance. Finite conductor thickness will have an effect on the odd mode impedance.

To my understanding, the "closed form" solver in LineCalc of ADS is a curve match to emperical and 3D simulated data for coupled lines. I have found it to be accurate enough for most edge coupled filters, as well as much faster than a MOM solver.


Top


guestX
Post subject: agreement
Unread postPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 2:47 am

The differential issue does not work properly in AWR. Sonnet seems to be closer. anyway, measure and compare it.
I came to 98% agreement with hand-calculation on 200ohm diff TL. The vector analyzer measure single ended parameters, then it converts to diff. Do you want the formula for conversion?



Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line