Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all
the responses to the original posts.
Post subject: coupled microstrip lines
Unread postPosted: Mon May 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Does anyone have
any tricks for optimizing coupled microstrip lines for differential mode (Zodd=50ohms, Zeven=100ohms)? I find that
the closed form models in ADS and AWR do not match what is produced in Sonnet or Momentum.
Thanks for any
Unread postPosted: Tue May 25,
2004 9:03 am
Sonnet and Momentum are "2.5D" simulators, the conductors must be zero thickness. Are you
accounting for this? Momentum lets you define conductor thickness only for signal attenuation calculations not for
geometric impact on electrical performance. Finite conductor thickness will have an effect on the odd mode
To my understanding, the "closed form" solver in LineCalc of ADS is a curve match to emperical
and 3D simulated data for coupled lines. I have found it to be accurate enough for most edge coupled filters, as
well as much faster than a MOM solver.
Post subject: agreement
postPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 2:47 am
The differential issue does not work properly in AWR. Sonnet seems to
be closer. anyway, measure and compare it.
I came to 98% agreement with hand-calculation on 200ohm diff TL. The
vector analyzer measure single ended parameters, then it converts to diff. Do you want the formula for conversion?