Thank you for visiting RF Cafe! Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Clarification on the Reference Article - LNA's using 3db QH - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement

Post subject: clarification on the reference article - LNA's using 3db QH Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:51 am


Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 24
Location: Germantown,MD

Below is the link from the reference section. This paper uses Quadrature Hybrid cascaded with LNA to get better VSWR. I believe the Quadrature Hybrid provides 3dB loss. Assuming the LNA is designed to have a very low NF . Is it true that the net NF of the cascaded system will be closer to the NF/loss provided by the Quadrature Hybrid. So if this is true what is the true significance of this design technique. Any comments in this regard would be appreciated. LNA_Design_Using_Quadrature_Hybrid.PDF



Post subject: LNAPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:27 pm


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 6
Location: US
The increase in noise figure will be due to the actual resistive loss of the coupler. This could be .1dB, .25dB .5dB, or even 1dB. The actual loss is dependent on the frequency and the type of construction. The 3dB referred to is the result of the split with 1/2 the power going to each output. It is not real loss.

The signal and noise at the input are both split, amplified by the amplifier in each arm, and recombined. The net gain of the system is the gain of one amplifier (they are both the same to maintain balance) less the real loss of the coupler. The noise figure is the noise figure of the amplifier stage degraded by the resistive losses of the input hybrid. This will be tenths of dB's not 3dB.

The advantage of the balanced amplifier is that it is easier to match, partictularly if a wider bandwidth is required. The noise figure will be a few tenths of a dB worse than not using the hybrid. In most cases this is a good tradeoff.


Post subject: Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:17 pm


Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 24
Location: Germantown,MD
thanks for clarifying.


Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Kirt Blattenberger,

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !