Custom Search
Over 9,000 pages indexed!
|
| Your Host |
 KirtBlattenberger ... single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.
5CCG (5th
MOB): |
|
Hobby & Fun Airplanes and Rockets: Equine Kingdom: Doggy Dynasty: |
| ||||||
| ||||||
| can the unbalanced Pi attenuator take the place of isolator - RF Cafe Forums | ||||||
|
Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
Facebook page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts. cools Post subject: can the unbalanced Pi attenuator take the place of isolator Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:05 pm can the unbalanced Pi attenuator take the place of isolator? if do ,how about the performance? Top Guest Post subject: Pad substituting for isolatorPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:55 pm While a 30 dB pad would give 30 dB of isolation, I'm hard-pressed to come up with a situation where that would make sense. In a receiver, that would give a 30 dB noise figure: terrible! In a transmitter, that would reduce the power output 30 dB: what a waste! What is the context for this question? Good Luck! Posted 11/12/2012 | ||||||
| ||||||
|
Please Support My Advertisers
|