Unwanted Modulation - Nasty Stuff! - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in late 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2012, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts. Here is the full original RF Cafe Forums on Archive.org

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster

RF Head

Post subject: Unwanted Modulation - Nasty Stuff! Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:59 am

Captain

Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:26 pm

Posts: 11

I'm sure that at some time(s) in the past and if not then definately in the future you lucky RF people will experience unwanted modulation on your transmitter carrier / receiver local oscillator. This nasty issue has reared it head (again) on a recent design I am working on so it seems appropriate to bang in a post on this subject. Maybe there is a design gem or two out there in one of your brains that may help me and others out now and in the future?

My particular nasty unwanted modulation is due to a cellular telephone nearby.

Some thoughts...

1. VCO Isolation is not the cure all

Adding a cascode amplifier stage(s) between VCO output and final PA is always cited as a good idea. However, you may still find a boat load of modulation on your output signal even with these additional amplifiers in place. In practice I have found that although cascodes and other amplifier stages between a VCO and the antenna do provide lots of isolation you can still end up in a world of unwanted modulation pain. I have found in the past that I have got rid of FM modulation due to VCO pulling to end up with AM modulation due to variation in bias on my buffer and ampifier stages caused by the AM modulated interference signal (GSM is one such animal). If you can run amplifiers with a reasonable bias current the problem is eased somewhat. However, in practice it is often the case that you want to run with just a sniff of bias to get decent amplifier efficiency. In this case the AM on your transistor junctions reaps havoc!

2. SAW it off

It's a no brainer but if you can slap a decent filter on the output this will gnaw off a great deal of the out of band signal energy. Of course it doesnt help if the QRM signal is in band.

3. Isolators - fantastic

If you have the room an isolator or two is definately a must have on the output of the transmitter. I think there are now some chip parts around TOKO or Murata I think?

5. Synthesizer loop bandwidth

If your running a synthesized frequency source, you can dramatically improve unwanted VCO modulation by simply running with a wide loop bandwidth. Of course this has trade-offs elsewhere by worth considering if your spectrum is a comb of unwanted garbage!

6. Avoid running your oscillator at F.

Running your oscillator at frequeny F when you know that this is likely to have a large interference source near or in band is not a good idea. You should consider running your oscillator at a harmonic or sub-harmonic of F and then dividing or multiplying to get your wanted frequency F. The divider version of this is quite common on a few COTs radio IC's.

That's a good start I think!

Your thoughts on this subject would be much appreciated.

Steve

My VCO is definately getting pulled around.

Top

IR

Post subject: Re: Unwanted Modulation - Nasty Stuff!Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:44 pm

Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm

Posts: 373

Location: Germany

First, this is a great and challenging design issue.

From my own experience, most of the unwanted modulation problems were solved by improving the filtering of the VCO supply voltage. A careful selection of capacitors and ferrite beads is a first step.

In addition, there is a well-known circuit implemented by an NPN transistor with a voltage divider in its base that drops the supply voltage to the the voltage required by the VCO (This requires a higher voltage source for the VCO). This circuit has shown a significant improvement on the VCO's supply.

Other issues are careful PCB layout and shielding.

Concerning buffer stage, this is of course helpful but the buffers need to have a considerable S21-S12. There are specific amplifier models for this purpose.

_________________

Best regards,

- IR

Posted  11/12/2012