Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Suitability of Nickel Plating for Microwave Modules - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


RFpowerJunkie
Post subject: Suitability of Nickel Plating for microwave modules Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:57 pm

Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:52 pm
Posts: 3
I’m being forced down a route to adopt Electroless Nickel plating on aluminium for an enclosure that will contain a microstrip microwave assembly operating up to 12 GHz.
The RF needs to be launched onto microstrip via an SMA connector through the nickel plate on the enclosure.
Plating offered is in the range of 10 - 13 um (more than the skin depth at 12GHz) with a Phosphorous content of 6 - 12%.
It appears that for optimal electrical properties Phosphorous content needs to be 1.5 to 3%.
Can anyone advise how much the insertion loss might change from moving from an aluminium enclosure to one with Electroless Nickel plating on aluminium?
We have previously used Electroless Nickel plating on aluminium up to 4 GHz with little observable effect but are unsure what might happen at higher frequencies


Top

fred47
Post subject: Nickel platingPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:50 pm

General


Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Posts: 104
Hi!
This is just a generic response to the question, as I don't have specific experience with the exact question.

As always at frequencies in that range, surface roughness is a strong contributor to loss. Of course, the electrical conductivity of the nickel is important, too.

So the big question is, what will your surface roughness be, after plating?

Good Luck,
Fred


Top

Joe
Post subject: Electroless NickelPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 pm

Captain

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 6
Location: US
I've used Electroless Nickel plating to 20GHz with no apparent degradation. In microstrip, most of the fields are confined to the ground plane of your substrate. Except for the transitions, the nickel will not have much effect. If you are looking to squeeze every last .1dB, there may be some additional loss, but in general there isn't a signifiicant difference.


Top

RFpowerJunkie
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:39 am

Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:52 pm
Posts: 3
Thanks for the advice Guys.

Can anyone suggest who might be the best company to approach in the UK for plating microwave enclosures?

I neglected to say I plan to glue the microwave assemblies to the enclosure with a thin layer of silver loaded epoxy.


Top

Joe
Post subject: Electroless NickelPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:08 pm

Captain

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 6
Location: US
Can't help on plating vendors on your side of the pond.

You didn't mention what substrate or carrier, if any, you are using. I would recommend an epoxy preform if you are going to see much temperature variation in further processing or in operation. Check the thermal coefficients of expansion for the aluminum and for your substrate and carrier.


Top

RFpowerJunkie
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:23 am

Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:52 pm
Posts: 3
Substrate will be Rogers 5880 at 15" or 20" thou.

My assumption is that the surface roughness of the plated finish is largly determined by that of the Aluminium underneath and that the plating will tend to smooth the milling cutter chatter marks left in the Aluminium .


Top

Joe
Post subject: Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:36 pm

Captain

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 6
Location: US
Once you launch to the microstrip on the 5880, most of the currents will be in the copper clad unless the copper thickness is not thick enough. I doubt that the housing finish will be a large contributor to insertion loss.







Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line