RMS Value - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in late 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2012, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts. Here is the full original RF Cafe Forums on Archive.org

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster

ljoseph

Post subject: RMS Value Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:34 pm

Captain

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:54 am

Posts: 13

Location: Dallas

This is a simple one.

Just consider two sine waves each with 1V peak value. Assume 1ohm resistor. The RMS value of each sine is 1/sqrt(2) and the average power is 0.5W.

Now, consider the signal which sum of the above sine waves. This will be a sinewave with 2V paek and average power of 2W. But the individual signls have only 0.5W so the sum should be 1W.... where am I missing?

Thanks,

Leyo

Top

VSWR

Post subject: Re: RMS ValuePosted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:29 pm

Captain

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:44 pm

Posts: 8

Hi ljoseph

The power formula is as you know P=V^2/R

So you see the power is a function of the square of the voltage. A 2x factor in voltage yields a 4x (2^2) increase in power. That's why you go from 1/2 W to 2 W (1/2 x 4 = 2).

You are thinking of the two independent 1 Vpk sinewaves across two independent 1 ohm resistors. It might not seem intuitive that impressing 2 Vpk across a single 1 ohm resistor would dissipate 2 W when individually (1 Vpk and 1 ohm, twice) they would dissipate only 1 W total, but that's Ohm's law (and real life). The two scenarios simply are not equivalent.

Top

ljoseph

Post subject: Re: RMS ValuePosted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:50 am

Captain

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:54 am

Posts: 13

Location: Dallas

Hi

Thanks for the answer.

One morer question on this.

I have a two signal generator set to 1Ghz and are connected through a combiner to the power meter. Each of the signal generator levels are adjusted so that each signal alone measures 0dBm on the power meter. Now, I turn on both signal generators. As per your analysis, the power meter should 6dBm.... it reads only 3dBm.

Looking forward for your comments.

Thanks.

Top

VSWR

Post subject: Re: RMS ValuePosted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:26 am

Captain

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:44 pm

Posts: 8

Hi again ljoseph,

The 3 dB power increase is correct when two equal amplitude, equal phase signals are added linearly. It is due to the way decibels work for power and voltage.

For a factor of 2 in power with units of power:

10 log (2) = 3.01 dB

For a factor of 2 in power with units of volts:

10 log (2^2) = 20 log (2) = 6.02 dB

In your previous case from the first post, you were doubling the voltage (two, 1 Vpk signals). In this one, you are doubling the power.

Top

Peter Raynald

Post subject: Re: RMS ValuePosted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:03 am

Captain

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:09 pm

Posts: 11

When strictly looking at adding voltage waveforms at a voltage summation point in a circuit, it is right to assume that you will get 6dB increase in power if the two waveforms are coherent.

But don't forget that your combiner performs an impedance transformation, some voltage from each waveform get's transfered to current by a squarerooth of 2 factor, and therefore you fall again on 3dB increase.

Posted  11/12/2012