Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Quadrature Hybrid Design and Fabrication - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


Michael
Post subject: Quadrature Hybrid Design and Fabrication
Unread postPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 1:25 pm

Good day. I am attempting to design a branchline hybrid (Quadrature Hybrid) that will operate between 2400 MHz and 2500 MHz.

I have simulated it in ADS. I used Rogers 4003C board material (er = 3.38, subatrate thickness = 1.542 mm (60 mils), and metal thickness = 0.0356 mm (1.4 mils or 1 ounce copper) to fabricate the hybrid.

Everything simulates perfectly, but when I get the fabricated board and test it, it does not work. The insertion loss is 10 dB, the return loss is less then 5 dB, and the isolation is less then 3 dB. I solder SMA connectors (Johnson Components 147-0701-631) on each of the four ports.

I am using an Agilent 8753E calibrated from 2350 to 2550 MHz. I use 2 - 50 ohm loads to terminate the 2 ports that are not connected to the VNA. Both 50 ohm loads have a return loss (S11) of at least 35 dB.

I used Pozar's book - Microwave Engineering 2nd Edition Page 379 - 383 to start the initial design.

Can anyone give me some thoughts or ideas about what is happening and how I can get the issue resolved.

Thank you for your time and help.
Michael


Top


Itay
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 4:32 pm

Sounds that you have some basic mistake...if your ADS simulation works well, there should be no problem in the lab.

Check the following:

1) Is your board assembled over a metal chassis? It should be assembled and fastened with screws to a metal chassis that will act as GND plane. Are the connectors assembled to this chassis and tightened with scrwes? As you know the VNA ports are referenced to GND, make sure that your GND isn't floating.

2) Have you calibrated the VNA for full 2 S-parameters measurements?

3) Check that the cables you use are in good shape..check their insertion loss and reflection.

3) Have you measured the width of the traces and verified they are in the same width as you defined them for the PCB vendor?

Hope this help, please let me know...

Good luck,
Itay


Top


Guest
Post subject: Quadrature Hybrid
Unread postPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:42 am

I agree with Itay. Also, if you have acess to an EM simulator like momentum , or sonnet you can performan em simulation. If the em simulation agrees with the linear model then the problem is most likely in the fabrication, and/or measurement.


Top


Guest
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:18 am

Yes In addition to that, EM Simulation might help if your device is assembled inside metal enclosure. It can predict possible couplings that can increase the insertion loss or other phenomena. Make sure that you enter the right height of the PCB from the enclosure top to get out the exact results. The Momentum is a powerful and fast tool for EM simulations, you can control the simulation time by defining the meshing of the structure.

Good luck and keep us posted if the solutions we provided helped you.

Itay


Top


Michael
Post subject: Quadrature Hybrid
Unread postPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2004 2:29 pm

Good day. Thank you very much for your thoughts and comments. I will answer Itay's questions

Check the following:

1) Is your board assembled over a metal chassis? It should be assembled and fastened with screws to a metal chassis that will act as GND plane. Are the connectors assembled to this chassis and tightened with scrwes? As you know the VNA ports are referenced to GND, make sure that your GND isn't floating.

Answer: The hybrid is not mounted in or on anything. The center conductor of the SMAs are soldered directly on the microstrip line and the connector grounds are soldered directly to the ground plane. The work bench where I am doing the testing has a wooden top with metal legs.

2) Have you calibrated the VNA for full 2 S-parameters measurements?

Answer: Yes. I did a full 2 port calibration of the VNA from 2350 to 2550 MHz with 801 points.

3) Check that the cables you use are in good shape..check their insertion loss and reflection.

Answer: Yes. I checked and double-checked the cables. I also used a second VNA to verify that the first VNA was working correctly.

3) Have you measured the width of the traces and verified they are in the same width as you defined them for the PCB vendor?

Answer: Yes. That was one of my thoughts also, so I measured the trace widths and the substrate thickness. Everything is as it should be.

I do have access to Momentum and I did double check my simulation results. Everything agreed very well between Momentum and my other simulation results.

Any additional comments or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your time and help.
Michael


Top


Itay
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2004 2:14 am

Here are few more thoughts:

Well I think that you should assemble your board over a metal chassis, and this is to ensure a good continuity of your GND plane. This is what I used to do with designs which worked at frequencies much lower than yours. This provides a safe way to ensure a good GND plane.

Have you checked that your termination resistor at the isolated port is OK (50 ohm)?

Can you verify that the substrate you are using in ROGERS and not FR4?

Another thought (maybe an over-kill) is to check that your traces truly have 50-ohm characteristic impedance (controlled impedance) with reflectometer.

Hope this helps...

Good Luck,
Itay


Top


Michael
Post subject: Quadrature Hybrid
Unread postPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:55 am

Good day. Thank you for all of your assitance. I have found the problem. Lance Lascari suggested that I should increase my frequency range to see what was happening. The quadrature hybrid worked very well at 2.85 GHz. 400 MHz higher then the design. That pointed me in the correct direction.

The problem was the Microstrip TEEs. I used ADS's layout feature to verify the dimensions. The dimensions were off. The dimensions of the TEE has caused me problems in the past.


Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line