Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

PLL Design - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


darcyrandall2004
Post subject: PLL Design Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:37 am

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
Hello,

I am attempting to design a POCSAG paging transmitter.

To Ones and zeros are transmitted by sending a 450.325MHz + 4.5kHz signal or a 450.325MHz - 4.5kHz signal.

The channels are broking into 25kHz bands.

Correct me if I am wrong, I need to design a PLL with at least a 9kHz passband.

I am using a LMx2346/2347 PLL from national semiconductor.

Following a text book I have been reading, I have written some code that will plot the transfer function of the PLL for me. To perform this correctly, I need to know what the Volts/Rad output of the phase detector is (the slop of the volts plotted per radians). All I can find with regards to the phase detector in the datasheet is that the charge pump will output 4mA max.

How do I determine the Volts/Rad output of the phase detector?

Thankyou

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

IR
Post subject: Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:35 am

Site Admin


Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
Hi Darcy,

The current from the charge pump is delivered to a the loop-filter which converts it to voltage. The current charges a capacitor which is the first component of the loop filter, as a result of the constant current flowing through the capacitor a voltage is generated. Then for the maximal current generated by the phase detector you will get the maximal voltage.

About the bandwidth of loop filter I guess you are right (As far as I understand) in order to transfer the full frequency deviation of 9KHz due to the transmission of '0' and '1'.


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:43 am

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
Hello,

The text I am reading claims that for charge pump PLLs, the phase comparison frequency must be at least 10 times greater than the PLL bandwidth.

My PLL bandwidth is 9kHz and my phase comparison frequency if 25kHz(the channel size). I have already laid the board out. Is the above statment from the text an over simplification or can anyone see a way around this through design of the loop filter?

What other options do I have?

My crystal reference is 10MHz. VCO freq = 450.325MHz. I was hoping to use an R counter value of 400. A counter = 29, B counter = 562.

I am beginning to think that I am going to have to incorporate a second PLL so that I can achieve stability.

Thanks again

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

nubbage
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:36 am

General


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 218
Location: London UK
Hi Darcy
I think one missing item of info is the POCSAG signalling rate you are using. Are you using the bog standard 512bps, or the higher rates sometimes used?
An FSK discrimminator I have used very successfully employed a D type Flip Flop driven by a crystal clock so that below the clock rate produced Q=1 (say) and above clock rate produced Q=0, but it sounds like you are locked into a charge pump circuit. The factor of 10:1 is a rule of thumb based on assumptions that designers want to use the simplest loop filter. I believe you can reduce this if you use a more sophisticated loop filter with high skirt rate roll-off. However, I do not know how far you can push this. Your system would be nearer 3:1.


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:51 pm

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
512 bps

Cheers

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:05 pm

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
Wait, Im confused.

If my N counter value = 32*562 + 29 = 18013, then one input of the phase detector will see a signal equal to (450.325*10^6+4.5*10^3)/18013 = 25000.250 Hz or for the transmission of a zero, a signal of (450.325*10^6-4.5*10^3)/18013 = 24999.750 Hz. Hence I assume the phase detector output will be a signal of +/- 0.25Hz and this is the bandwidth I should design the PLL to.

Alternatively because we are transmitting at 512bps, perhaps I should set my PLL bandwidth to 512Hz.

Could someone please correct my thinking.

FYI Baud rate = 512bps, R counter = 400, N counter =18013, Ref oscillator = 10MHz, TX freq = 450.325*10^6Hz +/- 4.5kHz, Using a charge pump PLL

Thankyou again

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

Peter Raynald
Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:25 pm

Captain


Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:09 pm
Posts: 11
I think the PLL bandwidth in your case is limited by the baud rate.

I think you need to make sure that your loop bandwidth is larger than the baud rate by 4 or 5 times. 9KHz seems to me more than enough.

The question or the 10X rule of tumb... I think it comes from the fact that a PLL is a digital device, you want it to clock much faster than your filter BW for the gain equation to hold as it it would all be a nice analog system.

However with 25KHz comparison frequency you will have a nice spur sideband due to your charge pump leakage unless you have the most brutal filter.

I may not be a concern to you.


Top

mikerauh
Post subject: Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:24 pm

Lieutenant

Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 3
Analog Devices has a great tool available for download on their website. It is called SimPLL. You can chose different loop filter topologies and see the loop filter response. The tool also reports modulation bandwidth. The tool is limited to Analog Devices PLL chips. ADI has many chips, possibly you can find one with 4 mA output current. Even if not, you can get an idea of what the 25 kHz reference spurs will be like with a 9 kHz loop BW.

The 10:1 loop filter rule is just a rule of thumb. The problem is to get enough roll-off in the filter to suppress the reference spurs while passing the modulation, AND maintaining enough phase margin to ensure loop stability. You need to know what is the requirement for reference spur level.

Mike Rauh







Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line