Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014     Visit RF Cafe on
      Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!          Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

Microstip/CPW question - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


boon
Post subject: Microstip/CPW question Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:21 pm

Captain

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:19 pm
Posts: 17
hi

which one is less lossy: microstrips or CPW's given both are on the same substrate and the conductor metal is at the same distance away from the substrate? some discussion will be nice. thanks


Top

kpainter
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:56 pm

Colonel


Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 11:47 am
Posts: 47
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
IMHO and experience, the CPW is the less lossy of the two. This has more to do with the fact that the fields tend to be more contained than with Microstrip which go to infinity on the air side. The losses are due to radiation. Dielectric losses should be the same. Because the radiation is reduced, coupling between lines is also reduced. If you are worried about spurs, CPW is the way to go - that is unless you can do stripline.

Microstrip kinda sucks, otherwise folks wouldn't make antennas out of a similar structure.


Top

boon
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:17 pm

Captain

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:19 pm
Posts: 17
thanks kpainter....but the field coupling to substrate is a major issue in on-chip transmission lines and wouldn't microstrip be better because the substrate is shielded by a ground plane whereas in CPW the conductor plane and ground plane are all on the same plane.

boon


Top

kpainter
Post subject: Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:25 am

Colonel


Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 11:47 am
Posts: 47
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Hi Boon,
I assumed you were talking about grounded CPW. In this case, there is a ground below the substrate just like microstrip. It turns out, according to AWR's Txline program, that the calculated loss is approximately the same for grounded CPW and microstrip when the gap on the CPWG is the same as the transmission line width. Otherwise, the loss of CPWG is higher - which makes sense. I am saying that in my experience, the actual loss of microstrip is somewhat higher due to radiation. But then, I don't recall what gap I was using but I think it was equal to the line width.

In both structures, the primary propagation path is in the substrate, not in the air - otherwise Er would 1. I don't know how you could build the ungrounded version of CPW in a IC??

Then again, your results may vary.


Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger
    KB3UON

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website