Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014     Visit RF Cafe on
      Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!          Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

LNA designing help! - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


spbhu
Post subject: LNA designing help! Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:53 pm

Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:44 am
Posts: 3
Location: NTU
Hi, regarding to several topologies of designing a LNA? The inductive degenation of common source should be the most popular one right now, but the limitation is the high voltage and not so good isolation. The common gate could be better in applying low voltage and good isolation, as well as input matching. Why few people use common gate topologies? If I want to design a low voltage(<1.0v) low power, narrowband RF LNA (abt 2.45GHz), among all the topologies, which could be more suitable for me to choose? Can you give me some suggestions? Thanks very much.


Top

uwavegeek
Post subject: common gatePosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:28 am

Captain

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:55 am
Posts: 6
My experience with common gate/base LNAs are that they tend to be more unstable than the standard common source topology. The biasing bypass on the gate/base is very sensitive to parasitic inductances which tend to be a pain.

You will have a hard time using a FET based technology for under 1V. A bipolar might have a better chance of working (SiGe).


Top

Guest
Post subject: LNAPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:51 am
The experience reported by "uwavegeek" matches mine.

However, your thoughts about common-gate circuits are in fact valid at lower frequencies (VHF/UHF), where you can actually reduce parasitics to a low-enough level.

Uwavegeek is also right about the 1V issue. It will even be difficult to do a really good job with SiGe or other bipolar technology.

Good Luck!



Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger
    KB3UON

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website