Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014     Visit RF Cafe on
      Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!          Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

IF transformers loosely coupled? - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


Charl
Post subject: IF transformers loosely coupled? Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:29 am

Colonel


Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 5:01 am
Posts: 25
Location: Netherlands
Hello folks,

I'm building a digital superheterodyne tube radio (for kicks, I'm sure you'll understand). Looking at some IF transformers from actual working tube radios, I find that they are very loosely coupled. The ferrite cores are about a centimeter away from each other (primary to secondary).

Why would they want such loose coupling? I would think that you want maximum amplification in the IF stages.

I was hoping to be able to wind my own 10.7MHz IF transformers on some ferrite cores, which were used for EMI filtering. Any idea whether this is the right core material for the job, or rather - will it work?

Thanks in advance,
Charl


Top

Charl
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 2:27 pm

Colonel


Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 5:01 am
Posts: 25
Location: Netherlands
Hello again,

Looks like I answered my own question.. this site was helpful:
http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14180 ... 180_74.htm

I'm sure that using those ferrite transformers as I intended to would have caused massive overcoupling.

I might be bugging y'all with some more questions in the future!

Kind regards,
Charl


Top

nubbage
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 7:32 am

General


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 218
Location: London UK
Hi Charl
I was going to post you a reply when I had found more info.
I designed a 28MHz IF amp some years ago that had a very tight selectivity spec, and I used loosely coupled LC discrete component resonators. There is a critical coupling mutual inductance required between the coils that ensures the Q is not significantly reduced by either the input circuit resitance or the output resistance. Also the Q of the individual resonators is quite critical. I set this by trial and error using discrete resistors then realised I could achieve the same result more elegantly and save cost and components by winding the coils with nichrome resistance wire. The resonato LC parallel circuits were coupled through length-wise slots cut in the screening cans.
This worked great, and the device became incorporated into the military Mallard C50/R222 transceiver system.

G3OAD


Top

Charl
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 12:14 pm

Colonel


Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 5:01 am
Posts: 25
Location: Netherlands
Hello folks,

A little update. I'm doing some experiments right now with airwound IF coils. First I'm just going to wind one IF trafo, tune the primary and secondary, and then take it to my university where I will be adjusting the coupling to get optimal bandwidth (they have a nice and expensive spectrum analyser).

I'm moving one step at a time. The (rather silly) setup works fine, but the bandwidth of this IF transformer setup is probably way off (and only works because it is corrected by other IF stages).

One I have a good working IF transformer I'll post some more pictures!

Kind regards,
Charl

[img]http://www.turingbirds.com/content/radio/if.jpg[/img]
N.B. "koppeling" means "coupling", it's Dutch.



Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger
    KB3UON

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website