Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014     Visit RF Cafe on
      Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!          Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

How to choose the device for PAs and LNAs - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

Post subject: How to choose the device for PAs and LNAs Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:46 pm


Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:29 pm
Posts: 1
I am working with a SiGe BiCMOS process that has different size bipolars.
For emitter width, we have three choices: 0.4um, 0.6um and 0.9um.

I have read some paper saying that for a PA, there is a relationship
between the maximum output power and the emitter area. Does anybody
know what is the exact relationship? Is that coming from the parasitic
considerations or others?

If we somehow determined the total emitter area of the PA. Which
emitter width to use? Some paper say that the narrower emitter
gives better NFmin and higher Ft. How can that be explained?
Even if that is true, it would apply to LNAs. Can PAs benefit from this?
(given that we don't care about noise of PAs)



Post subject: Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:23 am


Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Singapore
Hi :

I am sorry for my comments that are probably not directly related to SiGe BiCMOS devices, as I havent experienced using this device before

Just general comments on device for PA and LNA design. Usually for LNA design, we choose device with higher cut-off frequency as the noise figure will be lower, for example HEMT devices.

As for PA design, we choose device based on the power requirement, that related to device impedance, gate width, etc. For example, in most cases, MESFET is preferable for PA design, while HEMT is preferable for LNA design.

Any further advice is appreciated...

Warm regards,
Jean (EUDA)

Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website