Has anyone been able to simulate a Twisted Pair Cable? - RF Cafe Forums
Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would
be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate
that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views.
It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if
you would like to post something on RF Cafe's
page, please do.
Below are all of the forum threads, including all
the responses to the original posts.
Post subject: Has anyone been able to simulate a Twisted Pair Cable? Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005
Good day. Has anyone been able to simulate a twisted pair cable with ADS, Microwave Office, Eagleware,
I am trying to examine the effect of different twists and how they would affect coupling between the
Thank you for your time and help.
simulation of twisted pairPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:56 pm
Because you're dealing with the physical
configuration, you can't use a simulator which isn't physics-based for your task.
Sounds like you need an
3-D electromagnetics simulator, if you want to investigate this in detail.
But - the largest effect will be
the increase in wire length to cover a given distance. You should be able to calculate this easily.
second-order effects will be the increase in capacitance and inductance.
It may be that you don't need
anything other than the largest effect.
At any rate,
Post subject: Re: Has anyone been able to simulate a Twisted Pair Cable?Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:48 pm
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 1:23 am
Location: Morgan Hill, CA (Silicon Valley, Bay
Good day. Has anyone been able to simulate a twisted pair cable with ADS, Microwave
Office, Eagleware, etc.?
I am trying to examine the effect of different twists and how they would affect
coupling between the two wires.
Thank you for your time and help.
What exactly are
you looking for when comparing different twists in a twisted pair cable? A 3D simulator might help, but I would
think that you'd just get different impedances for different twists and that would be about it. Will the twisted
pair be kept far away from metal objects? That would make a difference too since a twisted pair isn't shielded
like coax is.
Post subject: Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:12 pm
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:25 pm
Location: Hampshire UK
like telephone wire pairs is around 110 ohms.
The impedance of shielded twisted pair is not much different to
the shielded variety. Cat5 network cable amounts to a relatively high loss, but useful cable for short range
applications, is of this type.
You can get individually shielded pairs cable. In all these, the presence of
the shield is to protect the cable from external interference fields and to limit the amount of conducted and
radiated EMI from the cable. The shield does not primarily define the impedance, which is a function of the
conductor diameter, the spacing, the dielectric constant of the plastic separating the conductors. It would affect
it a little.
The "shield" around coax should not be thought of as a shield. It is one half of an unbalanced
transmission line. It is what happens if you think of one of the conductors of a balanced pair getting bigger, and
morphing its shape (in cross section), to surround the other, to eventually assume the shape of coax. The lines of
electric field then become radial between the centre conductor and what now surrounds it. This coax form of outer
very definitely has a profound effect on the impedance, by its dimension and the dielectric within.
Grounding the outside when there is a standing wave on a coax cable is a major sorce of EMI trouble. Triax, which
is a coax with a second outer braid, allows the outermost braid to be grounded (usually one end only), and is an
(expensive!) shield - the coax equivalent of the shielded twisted pair.
In theory, if one conductor of a
twisted pair gets up against a metal object more than its partner, you get some unbalanced current. In practice,
with a pair having a high rate of twist, it is remarkably immune to coupling. I once tried out some HF cable
distribution stuff that had six pairs around a mandrel plastic, in a jacket that was carbon loaded to make it "pre
lossy" so that it did not change its characteristic much as it aged in use. Provided all the unused pairs were
terminated, the balance between pairs was better than -60dB. We could run a small electric drill on one pair while
sending a vestigial sideband TV signal up the cable the other direction. Definitely a "don't try this at home"
Then again, it only takes ONE leg of ONE pair in a fat cable to get disconnected to have all the
rest get mangled with crosstalk! Ask any telephone engineer.